Rania Matar's A Girl and Her Room comes to London

girlroom

Further to my Closer Look at her series back in April, I am, quite honestly, massively excited to hear that Rania Matar is exhibiting her “A Girl and her Room” series in The Mosaic Rooms in London at the start of July.

It’s currently one of my favourite series and, as I’m sure you all know, seeing a series of images exhibited and in print is a totally different experience to looking at them online. I suggest you all pop down there and check this series out whilst it’s in London, unless you’re some kind of terrible person who hates nice things. In that case, I would suggest you just sit in a blank room, staring at the wall or something.

Personally, I can’t wait to see this series, as it has inspired my own personal project and, aside from enjoying the images, I’m hoping for further inspiration from having the opportunity of seeing the images in print.

A Girl and Her Room opens in the Mosaic Rooms on the 1st of July and runs until the 23rd of July.

Flickr's Favourite Camera and How it Really Doesn't Matter

Disgustingly, I took this using my phone. Is it a photograph? Yes, yes it is.

A follow up to a recent TechCrunch article caught our eye here at Small Aperture. The essence of the articles is as follows – the iPhone 4 is dominating Flickr stats as Flickr’s most used camera. The tone taken seems to be one of pure dismay, the Instagram app being the currently favoured target of demonisation. The suggestion is that the saturation of images taken using a camera phone is indicative of “the state of photography right now”. Personally, I am not convinced this is a bad thing.

With the advances in technology over recent years, those who could be classed as “casual photographers” have been able to enjoy the freedom of taking a photo using their phone, adding a few fun effects to it, and uploading it to Flickr, Facebook and other such social community sites to share with their friends incredibly easily and quickly. This upsets some, who feel that photos should only be taken with a “proper” camera, and that to take an image with a smartphone, upload it to Flickr, and have some of your friends praise it, even though you don’t even have an official photography degree or qualification of any kind, is a terrible insult to and a threatening encroachment upon our precious medium.

Passive aggressive sarcasm aside, my point is that I really don’t think it matters that a smartphone camera is at the top of Flickr’s most used stats, whether you’re of the opinion that Flickr is being used incorrectly or whether you’re seeing it as representative of photography’s general decline. In actual fact, I feel there are several positives to draw out of the significant increase in casual photography. Yes, I’m going to begin addressing them now, in a new paragraph which is coming up next. Seamless.

Disgustingly, I took this using my phone. Is it a photograph? Yes, yes it is.

First, it could be argued that the increase in the use of smartphones as cameras has shifted the market and helped to create better defined demarcations between the “casual user”, the “enthusiast” and the “professional” photographer. At one time, anyone with a passing interest in photography and a disposable income would have grabbed themselves a higher end point and shoot or even an entry level DSLR or bridge camera. These would be used purely for better quality family snaps, in anticipation of travelling abroad to document their time visiting various countries or, god forbid, to pursue it as a casual hobby, for fun. This still happens, of course, but now there is a greater degree and freedom of choice for people who enjoy dabbling in photography but can’t or don’t want to spend too much money. I can’t see how this is a negative development. Unless you hate people.

Essentially, we are witnessing the birth of the next generation of photography snobbery. The first generation (sadly still lingering, grumbling in the corner with its slippers and pipe) are the “film is just better” crew. It’s not photography if it’s not film, digital is cheating, I miss inhaling dangerous chemicals and so on. There is a place for both film and digital photography. Film is absolutely beautiful and has that romantic, inimitable quality to it, but when digital came along it brought photography to a brand new audience of enthusiasts and professionals, expanding and developing the medium. This is happening again: we will see photography tackled in new ways and artists will pick up and find a way to embrace the advantages new technology brings.

Another plus to introducing new people to photography is the overall increase in appreciation of the medium. The more commonplace it becomes, the more accepted it is, and we will suffer fewer problems down the line. It’s a bit like one of the other largely demonised interests in my life – videogames. Since the Nintendo Wii came along and introduced casual gaming to a massive new audience, when someone notices a games console in my house, they no longer immediately consider me a dangerous recluse who spends all his time dreaming up violent fantasies, entrenched in his own filth in a basement somewhere, not eating for fear of losing precious gaming seconds (I save all that for weekends). Similarly, the stigma and prejudices aimed at photographers, of which there are many, will start to soften and melt away.

An image from Michael Wolf's "Paris Street View" series, taken by photographing and cropping an image found using Google Street View. See more of Michael's work here - http://www.photomichaelwolf.com

The important thing to take away from all this is that it is problematic and dangerous to hold the stance of “the better the camera, the better the photograph”. Photography should be seen as independent of the equipment used: for me, photography lies in the intangible essence of what you are trying to achieve. It’s about composition, choice of subject, timing and the story you tell by combining all these elements. A stunning example of this is a series of photos that have caused significant controversy this year – a series of images taken using Google Street View by Michael Wolf (link to a February BJP article here). I won’t go into depth on my thoughts of it here, that’s for another article, but I admire the thought process behind this series and applaud it. The outrage caused is most likely the same outrage from those who are upset by the increased use of smartphones being used to take photographs.

This all reminds me of the story of a good friend and fellow photographer of mine. He was once complimented on one of his images by an unwitting fan, who had no intention to offend by any means: “wow”, he enthused, “you must have a really good camera!”.

Visibly disgruntled, he replied “yeah, and Shakespeare had a really nice pen”.

The non-tecchie, hands-on photography workshop

Charlie, by Annabel Williams

Someone has coined it as ‘One man, one woman, no techy-twaddle, the photographic time of your life!’ It’s the Annabel Williams and Marko Nurminen two-day seminar that takes the tech out of taking pictures and focuses on creativity and people-skills. Rather than being stuck in front of your computer editing, or spending hours reading your camera’s manual, these two will have you taking pictures that really zing and remind you why you love taking photos.

The idea is to get the best out of your images by enjoying yourself, as well as learning just what makes portraits work. And it doesn’t matter what your level of experience is. If you’re just starting out with your new-fangled dSLR, start here.

There’s already been one workshop in London, which had the people who attended it buzzing: ‘Your non-technical way of teaching has actually taught me far more technically than when I took a ‘traditional’ (boring) course. Seeing how the settings you choose on your camera produce the images they do, has given me much more of an understanding of how it all works together.’

Does that make you feel as if you missed out? Why not sign yourself up for the Leeds version? I’ve heard a whisper that there are still a few places available.

It’s running on 12 and 13 July and costs £495 (+VAT) for both days. Numbers are limited to 28, and even then the group is split into two, so you’ll get plenty of attention, whether you’re working with Annabel on a shoot or Marko in the editing suite. The venue, the Round Foundry Media Centre, looks impressive, too, as well as having a canal and some derelict Egyptian-style architecture close by.

More details are available here.

Book review: The Focus series from Lark

Lark Foudn Faces

Ooh, I’ve just been flicking through a series of photobooks that I’ve found, well, delightful, I suppose. (I’m trying not to sound too much like a Jane Austen character describing afternoon tea taken with her newest female confidante.) Anyway. They’re the Focus series, published by Lark. They picked some themes, they got involved with some photo-sharing communities, and then they produced some books. Simple.

The result? Five themed photobooks: found faces, letters, love, passages, and reflections. I honestly couldn’t choose which book I like best. Letters makes me want to pick up my camera and race off into my little corner of east London, hunting down random qs and sleeping zs. My soft-spot for reflections is well known, so that’s an easy score with me. And as for found faces – pictures of mundane, or not so mundane objects, that mysteriously look like faces, from surprised eggs in an egg poacher to miserable looking handbags – it just makes me smile. Yes, even when I look at the grumpy ones.

As the images have been drawn from photo-sharing communities, they come from all over the world and have different attitudes and perspectives. You’re not confronted with one photographer’s quest to shoot the perfect door, or an exploration of images of love from someone who’s disgustingly smitten. There’s variety – and inspiration – in many different forms.

What’s more, these books are worlds away from pretension. There aren’t acres of text from the photographers, explaining what they were attempting to convey through the photo, how it made them feel to shoot the images, and what they went on to have for lunch afterwards. They’re just collections of images bound by a common theme and presented with the photographers’ names, the images’ titles, and where they were taken.

Okay, so occasionally there is a sentence or two of blurb to add some context, but nothing gushing. Something like this: ‘This image was shot in a place called Graffiti Alley. The entire alley is a painter’s canvas, and it changes on a daily basis.’ The focus (ahem) really is on the pictures.

The Focus series are cute and quirky and bursting with gorgeous images. They make super presents; even if the recipient isn’t a photographer she or he would have to be a pretty miserable sod to not appreciate the fun images. And if you’re looking for a bit of inspiration for a photo project of your own, you’d do well to take a look.

They’re all available on Amazon, and they’re all under £10 (or US$15); go and peruse.

Equipment for sports photographers


Sports photographers must record fast action, sometimes in unpredictable light, often from a distance, and regularly out of doors, where weather can be a factor. Sports photography is very gear intensive, so here's a guide to what you ought to be looking for.

screen_shot_2011_06_21_at_085609.jpgCamera. Perhaps more than any other photographic discipline, sports photography requires a higher-end dSLR camera. Specifically, look for a camera that can capture at least four frames per second, has a buffer capable of holding at least 15 images and supports track- ing autofocus. Most dSLR cameras sold today support an ISO of 1000 and beyond and 1/4000 shutter speed or faster, which is plenty sensitive and fast enough for sports photography purposes. If it’s in the budget, and if you know you’ll be shooting in snow, near the water, or at outdoor events in which weather may be a factor, opt for a water-resistant camera, or even under- water housing for your camera body.

Lenses. Depending on where you are relative to the action and what type of shot you want to compose, you will need different types of lenses. For example, if you’re photographing a baseball game and you want to capture the entire field, you’ll need a wide-angle lens. To focus on a single player, or to isolate your object from the background, you should opt for a telephoto lens. Alternatively, use a fish- eye lens or a selective-focus lens for very dramatic images that exaggerate the scope of the environment or create other interesting effects. With cost being a major factor, many people opt for a variable aperture lens such as the 70–300mm f/4–5.6 rather than the 70–200mm f/2.8 for field sports. When starting out it’s a good idea to be prudent with both your budget and your photographic expectations.

Filters. If you are shooting an outdoor sporting event in bright sunlight, attaching a graduated ND filter onto your lens can help to balance overexposed areas of sky. You can use UV filters to cut through haze, which is sometimes a factor in outdoor competitions that take place in large urban areas. Many photographers also use UV filters to protect their lenses from potential scratches and marks.

screen_shot_2011_06_21_at_085615.jpgMonopod. Especially if you are working with large, heavy lenses, a monopod can help you steady your shot, not to mention alleviate arm fatigue!

Protective gear. When shooting outdoor events, your camera is vulnerable to the elements. Using protective gear, such as covers for your camera and lenses, on a shoot can shield your equipment from such hazards as rain, snow, spray, and so on. Waterproof camera housings are also available.

Viewfinder Hood. If you are shoot- ing in harsh light, for example on the water or on a snow-covered mountain, it can be difficult if not impossible to see your LCD screen. Using a small rubber or plastic hood to view the screen can make it easier to see.

Bags. A rolling equipment bag is great for carrying gear to a shoot. A large fanny pack is also handy for holding your gear during the event.

Bulb blower and brush. Especially if you are shoot- ing somewhere dusty, such as at a horse track or a motocross event, you’ll need tools to clean the dust from your lenses and your image sensor.

Big Glass, Fast Glass

Unlike most amateur and semi-pro sports photographers, who typically use zoom lenses because of their relative versatility, some pro photographers — especially those who specialize in field sports such as football, where the action may be occurring some distance away — use very large (400mm or 600mm) fixed lenses. These lenses, called “big glass,” feature near- perfect optics and carry a hefty price tag. Unless you’re shooting elite or pro sports for which distance is a factor, they’re probably overkill.

In addition to big glass, some photographers also use lenses described as “fast glass.” A fast-glass lens is a zoom lens with a large aperture. Lenses with large apertures allow more light to pass through, enabling you to use a faster shutter speed. As such, fast-glass lenses generally allow for better shooting in low-light conditions. For example, a 70–200mm f/2.8 lens, or a 16–35mm f/2.8, or a 50mm f/1.8 lens.

screen_shot_2011_06_21_at_085750.jpg

Image Stabilization

Image Stabilized lenses (also known as Vibration Reduction) can help you reduce or eliminate out-of-focus shots caused by using a long telephoto lens, shooting from a distance, and/or employing a lower shutter speed due to low light.

Motorized sensors inside the lens detect small vibrations and shift the internal lens element in the opposite direction so it cancels out the motion, resulting in sharper images.

About the book

This is a short extract from Erin Manning's most recent book, Make Money with Your Digital Photography. I have a copy, and it's a great book indeed, full of tips, advice, and fantastic photos throughout. Well worth a closer look!

Unique for this book, as well, Manning features interviews by expert photographers for each chapter. In this one - the sports chapter - for example, she features two successful, yet very different sports photographers; Reid Sprenkel is an amateur sports photographer and Serge Timacheff is the chief photographer for the International Fencing Federation.

Most big book shops worth their salt will have a copy or two on the shelves. If they don't it may be that they have a couple of books tucked away under the counter. Smaller book shops should be able to order you a copy - all you need is to give them the ISBN number (It's 978-0470474310), and they'll sort you right out.

If you're one of those high-tech types, you should be able to get a copy of the book from Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk - Enjoy!

Fancy giving Brett Ratner a hand?


Brett Ratner, a successful Hollywood director, producers and photographer (You can stalk him over on IMDB, if that's your thing), is inviting aspiring photographers to work with him on a photo shoot with Treats! Magazine in Los Angeles.

Interested? All you need to do is to submit one original portrait photograph displaying your creativity for the chance to work with Brett. The winner will work with Brett on a Treats! photo shoot to learn invaluable advice from an industry professional.

The shoot will take place in Los Angeles and will be featured in the 3rd issue of the magazine and will also be credited in the same issue. Travel and two nights' accommodation will be provided.

The 5 highest voted submissions will each receive a signed copy of a Rat Entertainment DVD and a year long subscription to Treats! Nifty stuff.

Find out more and sign up over on the Talenthouse website!

Ssssh! It's the new Leica M9-P


Just got a whiff of the newest addition to the Leica line-up - the ultra-discreet version of the Leica M9 - but this time, aimed at professionals who love taking photos on the sly. It even loses the red logo, for extra stealth!

Here's what Leica had to say about it...

Leica Camera AG is proud to present a new version of the world’s smallest, full-frame digital system camera: the Leica M9-P. This new model will sit alongside the Leica M9 in the company’s rangefinder portfolio. Providing an alternative, even more discreet and resilient design that further reinforces the classic nature of the M9, the M9-P specifically meets the needs of professional photographers. The new model is now available in a classic silver chrome or subtle black paint finish.

Featuring the compact size, full-frame, 18 megapixel 24 x 36mm sensor (35mm format), sophisticated image processing and robust construction of the highly successful Leica M9, the M9-P also incorporates features designed for professional users or photographers who prefer a pure, even more unobtrusive styling.

The Leica M9-P includes a scratch-resistant, sapphire crystal covering on the LCD screen. Produced using special diamond cutting tools, this screen is fashioned from one of the world’s hardest and most resilient materials. Extremely resistant to wear and almost unbreakable, the sapphire glass LCD cover offers many years of reliable use. Additionally, the anti-reflective coating on both sides of the cover improves the review of images on the display after capture, particularly in unfavorable lighting conditions.

Finished in vulcanite leatherette, the external covering of the body of the M9-P is particularly resistant to wear. This leathering features a more coarsely-textured finish that ensures a steadier grip when shooting, making the M9-P feel particularly safe and secure in the hand.

Fulfilling the needs of many professional photographers to capture the decisive moment as discretely as possible, the Leica M9-P’s minimalist styling highlights its most essential features. The Leica red dot logo and the M9 lettering on the front have been omitted and replaced with the Leica name in classic script form engraved on the top plate, making the M9-P the quintessential unobtrusive tool.

The functions of the Leica M are consistently constructed for extreme durability and a long working life. The highest quality materials, intricate manufacturing processes and meticulous manual assembly at Leica Camera’s facility in Germany guarantee functional reliability for years to come.

The Leica M9-P will be available from Leica dealers in two different finishes, black paint or traditional silver chrome, beginning July 2011.

Wanna see more? Not to worry, I have a full gallery of photos of the delicious-looking Leica M9-P!

Being a real life CSI photographer


Anyone who watches crime shows on TV will have heard the whirring sound of someone clicking seemingly endless photographs of skid marks, broken glass, and bodies. In fact, more people than ever before know what forensic photography is: Photography used to record details at crime and accident scenes as part of the evidence-gathering process. It's no job for amateurs — except perhaps when a bystander* with a camera phone gets off a few shots before first responders arrive. Camera phone photos are being used as evidence in an increasing number of criminal and civil trials.

*) Just a random aside: if you are one of those bystanders, I would recommend you take your photos with a camera, and take the memory card out. In the UK, at least, police have the power to seize the evidence - by force if necessary - and you won't see your camera phone again until after the trial. If you witnessed something quite serious, you could be talking months. It's less painful to have to give up your memory card than your whole camera or phone.

I was lucky enough to be able to interview an UK crime scene investigator, C, whom I know via my role as a Special Constable in the Metropolitan Police. In the Met, we call them SOCO (Scene of Crime Officers), but the job is pretty much the same.

"The core role of a CSI is to attend crime scenes and identify, document and collect evidence.", C explains. "At one end of the scale it could be a criminal damage and at the other, a murder scene."

What's in a CSI's photo bag?

"I keep all of my kit in a Pelican Case.", C says, pointing to a sturdy-looking piece of kit on the floor. Pelican cases come in all sorts of shapes and sizes, but they have their absolutely incredible robustness (some would say 'bullet-proof', but that would probably be like swearing in church in presence of a Crime Scene Investigator) in common. They aren't cheap, but they can be had from Amazon (USA/UK) at reasonable prices.

"The Pelican case keeps everything protected", C says, and adds, laughing: "Another advantage is that it can also double as somewhere clean to sit."

C shows me the content in the case. I have to admit: Given the high-tech feel of forensics in general, I am a little bit disappointed. There's a Nikon D200, a 18-35mm lens, a 60mm Macro lens, four 512MB CF cards, an SB-800 flashgun and extension cable, a Metz 45 Flashgun a Quantam battery pack and extension cable and a shutter release cable. Packed into the lid of the case are various scales, stickers, a spare pair of gloves, and a white balance card.

"Unfortunately", C says wistfully, "I don't have any say in the equipment I'm using. The D200s were purchased before I arrived, and before that everyone was shooting with film. We've had the Nikon D200 cameras for a while now. They do the job very well, and with all the budget constraints I don't see this changing anytime soon."

"Don't get me wrong", C interjects, "I like all the equipment. I have to say, though, my favourite has to be the 60mm lens. It provides incredible detail."

The macro lens comes in particularly handy in certain situations. "Sometimes fingerprints cannot be lifted in the normal way", C explains, picking up the 60mm lens, and weighing it in his hands, "for example if they are in grease or blood. I use this lens to photograph fingerprints with a scale. It surprises me each time I do it."

Even though C has two different flashes at his disposal, he doesn't like using them much. "I don't like flash. I use it when I need to but if I can find another way then I always try that first.", he says. "When I attend someone's home address for injury photos, I'll always suggest we do it in the rear garden for example. This gives us the use of the natural light instead of the flash inside."

"On the more exotic scale of things, we have use of Ultra Violet photography. The UV can show up bruises and injuries that aren't visible to the naked eye or camera. This is particularly useful when photographing bite marks."

"We also have use of 'body mapping photography'. This is where we take a series of photographs at different angles of a person, usually deceased, and the injuries can be put onto a 3D digital model for court." Why would you bother, you might ask? Well, most importantly, it prevents having to show the actual photographs of a dead body in court.

At the crime scene

Crime scene investigators have a little bit of leeway in how they do their job, but the most important thing is to keep the audience for the photos in mind: It's the jury who will eventually convict - or acquit - the suspect of a crime.

"Some of the things I do make it easier at court when a jury or judge are looking at my photos.", C says, clearly passionate about getting this bit right. "They've never been to the scene and may not even know where it is. The trick is to take photos as if the viewers were walking through the scene. Each photo has something from the last photo in it, this helps join it all together."

"I use stickers with arrows on them, these indicate points of interest", C says, waving vaguely at the stickers in his Peli case. "I'll normally take a wide shot, another one closer to a subject and then a close up with the 60mm lens. I also use the distinctive yellow number markers."

The thing you see in the movies, with the gruff police officers saying "Nobody touch anything" as they cordon off a crime scene? Yeah, that's pretty accurate. "Nothing is moved in the scene until the photographs are taken", C says. "This means I can present a true and accurate record of the scene when I arrived. If I find something as I move items, then it's photographed as I go."

What's the job like?

"My job involves attending crime scenes - but some times I attend scenes where there isn't a crime involved. Sudden deaths and suicides are one example. I attend in order to ensure that there is no foul play and to document the scene for the Coroner."

"Sadly", C says, "people get an odd impression of what my job is from watching CSI and shows like that. Obviously, I don't have a gun - they don't even hand those out to the beat coppers here in England - but my van doesn't have lights and sirens either. Hell, I think my van is the least desirable of the whole fleet! Beats taking the bus though."

"I work a shift pattern, like most people in my office. The hours are between 0700-2200 every day of the week, every day of the year. Once or twice a week, I end up on call", C explains, "which is often after a late shift. When that happens, it means I am on call until 0700 the next morning".

It isn't all photography, the job of a CSI, either. "Some of the items I could be collecting are footwear impressions, fingerprints or items for DNA consideration.", C says, "There are many techniques for recovering these items."

Despite the perceived glamour around the job, Being a CSI isn't a particularly creative job. "I use to photograph weddings before this job and that was really creative", C laughs, takes a sip of his tea, and shares a couple of anecdotes about the daft things brides and bridesmaids get up to. Then, he goes a bit quieter: "My new job is quite different".

"Crime Scene Photography is record photography. Everything needs to be taken as if the person viewing the photo was actually at the scene. This is something I struggled with when I first started. I'd look at my photos and think 'What the heck is that!?' I have got used to it now". C doesn't miss the creative aspect of photography, however: "I can be creative when I use my camera at home!", he says.

The most challenging situations to photograph come from technical and non-technical angles. "Sometimes I may need to use balanced and reverse balance flash. That can sometimes get the cogs in my head turning slowly.", he smiles, miming the aforementioned slow-turning cogs with great precision.

The other obvious challenge with a job like this is the things you come across on your average work day. "I'm human", C assures me in a tone that makes me think that people have an odd tendency to forget that.

"I know that a lot of things I see are upsetting. One thing I am good at is not being emotionally involved with a job. I see all sorts of horrid things, but to me it's a career, a professional one", he says. "I see deceased adults, children, people with horrific injuries and things you'd never think possible. The trick is to remain professional and remember that people involved expect me to do a good job. So that's what I do."

"I'm happy to admit that I am a clean freak. I like everything to be organised and in its place", C says, with a serious expression on his face. Not hard to understand, perhaps - how organised C is will directly affect whether a criminal gets locked up behind bars, or walks out of the courthouse whistling a Lady Gaga tune."My van is one of the tidiest I've ever seen - and you should look at my fingerprinting case! It's immaculate!".

Between you and me, it's people like C that make working with the police that little bit more fun.

After the fact

"I'd say about 75% of the photos I take will end up in an album for court", C says, explaining where his photos fit into the grand scheme of things. "If I produce an album for court, then I also have to produce a statement. The statement will outline how I conducted my examination and what I recovered. I also state some observations I make at the scene too."

"If the defence indicate that they may wish to contest part of my evidence or question me in relation to it, then I will be warned that I have to come and be questioned in court". Being 'warned for court' is a phrase that gives any member of police staff the chills, as it isn't a pleasant thing, having a defence lawyer trying to shred apart anything you've said or done. "I have been warned a few times", C says, and gently taps the wooden chair he is sitting on, "but yet had to give evidence in this role".

"I love the spontaneity of my job", C says without hesitating for a split second, when asked why he's doing it. "Each day really is different. I could go on duty and have a number of jobs to attend when something happens and the day's plans go up in the air. I love being out of the office. Being stuck at a desk would drive me insane. The hard work pays off when I identify an offender, that's what it's all about".

After thinking for a moment, he adds, laughing - "Y'know what I really love? Catching the same guy for more than one job!"

To hopeful future CSI officers...

If you're interested in becoming a CSI, the first two things you should know is that it ain't like on the telly, but that it's a great job anyway.

"I'd never give it up for anything", C says.

"You've got to be motivated and dedicated. Once you start a scene, you've got to finish it", he says, with a shrug. Yes, that does mean that you're working horribly long hours from time to time. "Attention to detail is paramount. You'll need to have a strong stomach; you'll see lots of horrid things."

Of course, a solid interest in - or, even better, experience with - Science, Policing and or Photography will be a great help.

When a vacancy comes up, there will be hundreds of applicants. You'll need to set yourself out from the rest somehow.

About C

C prefers for his name not to be known. His name isn't C - that's short for CSI for the purpose of this interview - but he's a great guy, and I'm really grateful that he has helped me with this article.

C's a CSI for a large police force in the UK, but he has worked for the police in various other roles before, including being a Special Constable (like me!) for six years, with another force. He loves his job, and he loves talking about it, too - because a lot of people find it interesting, for obvious reasons.

If you liked this article, take a look at C's blog, and consider following him on Twitter - he tweets as @CSIguy01

Focussion, one year on

Screen shot 2011-06-20 at 17.03.30

Doesn’t time fly when you’re having fun? Well, I’ve certainly been having fun and I can’t quite believe that it has been very nearly a year since we took a peek at the community over at Focussion. It’s a photo-sharing site that actively encourages giving feedback to other members: you’re given an initial stash of tokens and every image that you upload costs you tokens. You can only replenish your token supply by dishing out feedback.

A year on, I was wondering how things were going for them, so I caught up with Aljan, one of the co-founders.

‘We’ve grown a whole heap in our first year,’ says Aljan ‘and we’ve added several new features to Focussion, too.’

A key feature that they’ve implemented is giving extra tokens to a member when her or his feedback is marked as helpful. Obviously that goes some way to ensuring that feedback is more than just ‘Great shot!’ (And I’ll admit that I’m rather pleased about this because it was something that I recommended when I jumped in last year.)

In a bit of a FaceBook-esque move, you no longer rate photos, but ‘like’ them instead.

The front page still shows the most recently uploaded images, but over on the sidebar you now get to see most liked images and most helpful members in addition to most recently commented-on images.

Realising that their members wanted to talk to eachother outside of photo critique, the team created some forums, too. So now there’s chatter about gear, techniques, and what’s happening on the site.

As for what’s happening on site, they’ve a few plans up their sleeves: ‘We’re going to launch a photo contest soon, as well as enable members of uplaod sets or series of images. And we’re working on allowing photos to be displayed across the width of the page, too.’

It’s great to see that people have embraced Focussion and it isn’t just another photo-sharing site that’s slipped by the wayside. If you’ve not checked it out yet, and you’re looking for some feedback on your work, wander over and have a look.

Gallery: Adventures in Pinhole


I spent an afternoon on a recent trip to Turkey with the Wanderlust Pinwide attached to the front of my Olympus E-P1.

A proper review will be coming up as soon as I finish a top secret project I'm working on - for now, enjoy some of the shots I captured!

You may also be interested in my earlier article about how you can make your own Pinhole for your dSLR or EVIL camera - for next to no moneys!

The most expensive photography workshop in the world?

haje-jan-kamps-20100730-30072010162

Ladies and Gentlemen, grab a seat (you’ll need one) whilst I give you details of a day-long photography tutorial with overnight accommodation in a swanky London hotel, that’s just dropped into my inbox. The idea is learn how to get the most out of your dSLR by shooting for a day in London with a tutor before a spot of editing, making your shots into a slideshow, and finally collapsing into a luxury bed at London’s Intercontinental Hotel on Park Lane.

You’ve a choice of four different sessions with your pro-tog tutor: old and new; a pro-studio fasion shoot; wildlife in Richmond Park (where I believe that there are deer); or plantlife in Petersham Nurseries, which are also in the Richmond area.

If you were worried that you might pass out from low blood-sugar, fear not because there’s a working lunch included to sustain you.

All this can be yours for a starting price of £939, plus VAT.

Really.

I mean, I know that it’s the Intercontinental Hotel and everything, but I checked out the prices and there are rooms available from about £200. And if lunch comes from Eat, I shall not be impressed. Also: what’s the plan for getting people to Petersham Nurseries, because it’s easiest by train and bus. You do not want to pay £939 (plus VAT) and then have to wait for the 65 outside Richmond station.

Seriously, you can buy yourself an entirely competent dSLR, a shiny 50mm lens, a small library’s-worth of books, and a long weekend at the coast for that price. If this one is all about the experience, then it needs to be revelatory.

If of course you do have money to burn and would like to check it out, head over to EYE Photographic.

Panasonic launches the Lumix GF3


Just five days after Sony launched its diminutive NEX-C3, claiming it to be the smallest, lightest camera in its class (so that’d be without a mirror but with interchangeable lenses), Panasonic has wheeled out the Micro Four Thirds mount Lumix GF3 to wrest from it the crown of tininess. The camera doesn’t look that bad, either.

It comes with just about everything that you’d expect from a shiny new camera now. There’s a touch screen that allows you to pick your point of focus with the tap of a finger; there’s full HD video (1080i at 25 frames per second) that comes with full-time auto-focus and auto-focus tracking; there’s a range of in-camera editing facilities, such as retro and high-key; and of course there’s the all-singing, all-dancing intelligent auto plus function. The camera will choose the right mode for the picture, there’s anti-blur technology a-plenty, and a face recognition doo-dad.

If you want to have a go at 3D photography, there’s a lens for that, too.

At 12 megapixels, it seems as if Panasonic might be calling a truce in that particular arms race. Okay, so things might’ve switched to how small they can make things now, and it might get old pretty quickly, but for now it’s more fun.

Want one? They’re available in four different colours for £499 (US$599.99) with a 14-42mm kit lens from mid-July.

More details available from Panasonic.

Watermarking your images


I very occasionally use a small watermark on my images - but only for my travel blog, oddly.

I recently received an e-mail from Danielle, a reader who was confused that I seemed to post most of my photos online without watermarking them. We had an interesting e-mail discussion, and I received her permission to re-write the discussion into a blog post.

The case for watermarking

Photography seems to be an ever evolving art movement. As quickly as it began, it has undergone many advancements. This relatively new art practice has gone from the camera obscura to cameras built-in to our tweet-enabled, facebooking phones. Anyone has the ability to snap a photo and have it uploaded onto the web within seconds. Mind blowing? Sure. Good for business? Definitely not.

Just as quickly as advancements in technology giveth, they taketh away. Technology has made stealing photos, your sweat, blood and hard work as easy as holding down two buttons. If you don’t properly identify your photographs as your own copyrighted pieces of work with watermarks, you may find yourself hiring ip lawyers to get your intellectual property taken down and back into the rightful owner’s hands. Not watermarking your photographs with some form of logo or even simply a name is putting your work at risk.

Many photographers don’t find watermarking extremely important. In thinking that, you are putting your work out to the world to use as it pleases. Without a proper watermark, you will never know who will copy and use your photograph somewhere else. More importantly, you never know where these photographs will end up.

As a photographer, you should be aware that watermarks are there for your protection and to protect those clients who agree to be photographed. If a client should happen onto an inappropriate webpage or print that includes their picture, they will come to you looking for answers. Will you be prepared to explain the situation? As an artist, shouldn’t you take enough pride in any work you publish to include your name on it?

Some artists misconstrue watermarks as bulky and at times unprofessional looking. What they are not considering is how many different types of software and options there are to create these copyrighting texts for your photographs. Researching just a few watermarking software programs will show you that watermarks can be as simple and elegant or as bulky and obnoxious as you’d like. Of course not many artists would want a bulky addition to their work, but the point is artists have that option.

When photographs are taken out of context or away from the artist’s original concept, the integrity of the work is compromised. As photographers, we should be concerned with maintaining the utmost relevancy and honor in our work. Watermarking photographs might not be the end all to protection, but it is definitely a step in the right direction. All artists should consider taking these steps while they can because it is only a matter of time before the next boom of technology will flip the art of photography upside down once again.

What do you think?

I don't think I agree all that much with Danielle above - I do think that watermarks detract from my images, and I doubt whether watermarking is as much of a deterrent as she thinks. 

What do you think?

Police fail: Copyright? What is that?


Great against street crime. Apparently less so in copyright matters.

I was doing some research on various topics a while ago, and stumbled across a rather disturbing find. On a site run for and by police officers (specifically, the Special Constabulary - a voluntary police force, whose members have full police powers, including the power of arrest), there's a forum called 'news', where its members post news stories related to policing in the UK.

The interesting case from the perspective of copyright law is that the forum members routinely break the law by infringing the copyrights of the news organisations publishing the news stories.

Examples

All the below posts were posted not by 'ordinary' forum users, but by users who have a badge marking them out as 'serving police officers'. To get that badge, you apparently have to identify yourself to the forum moderators as a bona fide UK serving police officer.

The below are only the articles posted by serving police officers (there were also a lot of ones posted by people who haven't identified themselves as such), between June 1 and June 12th of 2011.

  1. Young PC arrested over 'death threats', with text from the Kensington & Chelsea Informer.
  2. Epsom Derby racegoer injured as train is stopped, with text from BBC News
  3. 2012 Olympic torch police counselling, this time with text from BBC News.
  4. PC Attacked 'Urinating French Tourist', with text from BBC News.
  5. 'Shooting' near submarine HMS Astute in Southampton with text from BBC News.
  6. Cable Burns Man 'Unrecognisable', with text and images from BBC News
  7. Inspector Admits Wife Assault, with text and images from BBC News
  8. Shocking!, with text and images from the Daily Mail
  9. Sentencing plans scrapped with text and images from the Daily Mail
  10. Babar Ahmad police officers not guilty of assault, with text from BBC News.
  11. "Finally, a judge who gets it", with text and images from the Daily Mail
  12. Sneak(er) Thieves with text from the Daily Mail
  13. Police 'could have prevented' Braintree Murders with text from BBC News
  14. PC (ex-Mr. Gay UK) Denies Rape Of Man, with text from BBC News.
  15. Thieves quit crime to claim benefits, with text from the Sun.
  16. GMP officers seize Mitsubishi Lancer, then write it off with text and images from BBC News.
  17. Gatwick Custody Officer paid compensation, with text from BBC News.
  18. Huddersfield woman ‘buried alive’ in woods by partner, with text from the Huddersfield Daily Examiner
  19. Metropolitan police officer sacked over texts to girl with text from BBC News.

But, isn't this fair use?

In short: no.

In long: In order to fall under fair use under UK copyright law, as far as I understand it, it has to be "Research and private study" (not applicable here), "Instruction or examination" (again, not applicable), "Criticism or review" (This would be the most likely contender in this case, but most of the posts are merely copying the original source, with no in-depth criticism, review, or analysis of the original piece), or "News reporting" (not applicable, as the news is already reported by the original source - copying it wholesale is not 'reporting'), or "Incidental inclusion" (not applicable).

Embarrassing.

In other words, each of the above posts break UK copyright law. Doubly embarrassing, then, that the lawbreakers in question are all police officers.

It would appear that the discussion of copyright has already happened on the Police Specials forum back in January of 2010, where one poster writes: "Given the nature of the site, I think we need to be quite careful about breaking the law" and "A better solution would be if we wrote a synopsis (or copied the first 10-20 words or so) and then linked to the original source - that way, there's no risk of any issues.".

In the long discussion that follows, it doesn't appear that the police themselves (or, at least, the small sub-section of police that post to this particular forum) understand how copyright works, or how it is meant to protect publishers, authors, and artists.

I suppose that if even a forum full of police officers doesn't grasp the basics of copyright, it's hardly a surprise that I'm finding copyright infringements on my own articles left, right, and center. Not surprising. Just a little depressing.

The pictures associated with this post are for illustration only, and were purchased from iStockphoto.

Further Reading

This is part of a 4-story series:

  1. What is copyright, and how do infringements harm you?
  2. Protecting your copyright in a Digital World
  3. Just because it's in my RSS feed, doesn't mean you get to steal it
  4. Ignorance is no excuse

In addition, you might enjoy Police Fail: Copyright, what is that? and Even Schools Don't Care About Copyright...

Learning from the pros on YouTube

Earlier today, I was catching up on my RSS reading and dipped into Search Engine Watch (Yeah, I have a dark past working in SEO, and I like to keep an eye on recent developments), when I found a post about the recent Google Doodle - and how it caught the eyes of the world, where all sorts of talented people decided to play the ridiculously low-tech instrument (I mean... Who plays a search engine? Rage against the Machine's Tom Morello - that's who). It rekindled my passion for Youtube, and I decided to have a look around and see if I could find any good photography video tutorials. Turns out that was easy to say and even easier to do...

Ladies and gents, without further mincing of words:

Rick Sammon's top 10 photography tips

Night photography

Full photography school

Episode 1:

Also, see the full 13-episode series here.

Light painting tutorial

Make your own macro lens

Make Magazine made a great little video tutorial of my Macro Photography for £10 article:

Wedding photography

Photoelasticity Birefringence Photography

Using a softbox

High key lighting setups

A great stop motion inspirational movie

So there we have it - a metric load of fabulous learning, inspiration, and general fun on YouTube. So the next time you're stuck for inspiration, why not just search for 'photography' on YouTube, and see what it spits out? You never know what you might learn by accident...

And on the eighth day God created the GF1...

_small_P1160375

Earlier this week, Thomas Leuthard wrote about only shooting feet for a street photography project. It turns out that Thomas uses a Panasonic Lumix GF1 for his street work, not the Nikon D7000 that’s his main camera. When I asked him what the GF1 is like, he wrote what is much pretty much a love-letter to it! So without further ado, here’s what Thomas thinks of the GF1, and why he uses it almost exclusively for shooting on the street.

Where it all began

I’ll be honest, it took me a while to get to grips with the GF1. I was in Beirut, Lebanon, and out one evening in the busy, happening area of Jemazie. All I had with me was the GF1 and I had it set to JPG only and black and white. I was just play around a bit, but soon I realised that although it was night, the camera could catch the available light together with the street illumination to produce a solidly exposed photo. I took some pretty good shots before we went to eat at one of the oldest and most traditional restaurants of Beirut, a tourist magnet called Le Chef.

The opportunity to make a documentary series here seemed to good to be true. I shot the restaurant, the head waiter, the cook, and the other kitchen workers. All in JPG with black and white out of the camera. Later on, looking back at the photos, I realised that this little piece of kit really does take very good photos. I was amazed by the black and white with high contrasts it produced and that I could shoot in P mode and not have to think about the settings.

Advantages

After coming back from Lebanon, my street photography behaviour changed drastically. I started to shoot with my GF1 only and I realised just what advantages this little camera had. First: the size. It is pretty compact and it looks more than an point-and-shoot than a dSLR. You’re more likely to be thought of as a tourist than a journalist; always helpful to prevent constant questioning. Second: it’s quite robust and well-constructed. Finally, the quality of the photos is really stunning, although it does have a crop factor of 2.0. I can compare the quality with my Nikon D7000 and there’s not a lot of difference.

Disadvantages

If you’re used to a dSLR, you do have to get used to its diminutive form. But it comes quite quickly. As for the viewfinder, well, you could buy the optical one and add it on, but it’s small and pricey. You will be okay with the LCD screen. And actually, this can be an advantage on the street. You can shoot from the hip and still have a look at the composition.

The auto focus does work differently compared with a dSLR. You can move it with some buttons, but for street photography, it’s far too fiddly. When you leave it on automatic, to you might get an odd focal point. But it does recognise faces, which is sometimes helpful. The autofocus is not that fast, either, which you’ll have to factor into your street photography. Bear this in mind and you’ll have a lot of fun with this camera.

Settings

It works like a normal dSLR. You can set it in all the different modes like P, A, S and M. It has JPG and RAW; in JPG format you can set it to different colour and B/W modes (normal, dynamic, &c) and you have an intelligent ISO mode which only increases when the shutter speed get below 1/30. So you don’t really have to bother about the settings at all.

Quality

I only use it with the Lumix 20mm f/1.7 Pancake lens, which is about as expensive as the body. But I really like this lens. It might even be the best lens I’ve seen. I always shoot with an aperture of f/1.7 and I’ve never seen a lens that is this sharp at the maximum aperture. I’ve taken photos of people reading a newspaper and you could zoom in to read as well. It’s really amazing. Even with ISO 400 the photos are still quite good.

Handling

Although everything is a bit smaller than on my dSLR the handling is pretty simple. As I shoot only in P mode I don’t have to do a lot more than compose a photo and press the button. Even the battery lasts pretty a long time: you can shoot about 500 photos with it, depending how often you use the screen.

Accessories

The original accessories from Panasonic are very expensive, but, you can find nearly everything on eBay for about a tenth of the price. They are made in China, but the quality is fine. So I bought a second battery, a cable trigger, a camera bag, and a lens hood very cheap. Everything works fine and I’m happy with all the gadgets which make my GF1 even better.

Conclusion

Should you buy a GF1? Well, it won’t make you take better photos. You’re responsible for that. But the handling, the look and feel, the image quality, and the size makes it a really good package for a backup camera you can carry with you all the time. For street photographers, it makes an excellent alternative to a dSLR. If you have to chance to try it out one day, take it. You’ll be amazed by it.

P.S. I don’t work for Panasonic, I’m just a big fan of this camera as you can see on my Flickr! profile. There you can see all the EXIF data and when you compare the shots from the last six months, you’ll see that over will 80% were made with my beloved GF1. Would I sell my Nikon D7000? Of course not! But on the street, it’s the GF1 for me.

(Thanks to Thomas for this. Do check out his Flickr stream and his website, 85mm.)

News in brief: Fancy assisting Ben Watts?

We’ve just received word of a fabulous opportunity to work with photographer Ben Watts. He’s shot for Vogue, Elle, Harper’s Bazaar, Vanity Fair, and Conde nast Traveller. Now he’s looking for someone to join him in LA on a photoshoot for Treats! magazine. It’s pretty simple – you just have to submit a photo on the theme of energy – but you do have to move fast. The deadline’s 13 June.

The lucky winner gets travel to LA and two nights’ accommodation, plus credit for her or his work, which should feature in the magazine’s third edition.

As submissions are open to a public vote as well as the panel’s decision, the top ten entries receive a year’s subscription to the magazine.

Interested? You can check out more details here!

What is this? - In our NewsFlash section, we share interesting tidbits of news. Think of it as our extended twitter feed: When we find something that get our little hearts racing, we'll share it with you right here! Loving it? Great, we've got lots more News Flash articles - and, of course, we're still on Twitter as well, for even shorter news tidbits.

Walking in the air

img_e7fc6d2904d10440b38cd22838c3b0af2cb31bf6

How do you take a photo that makes it look as if you’re floating, or maybe flying? If you’re Natsumi Hayashi, a twenty-something photographer based in Tokyo, with a fast shutter-speed and by jumping up and down. Lots. Up to 300 times per shot, in fact. Sometimes she uses a self-timer and sometimes she ropes in a friend to click the shutter. But she still has to jump up and down. And with some shots taking up to an hour to get right, I’m surprised that she isn’t permanently exhausted.

I’m completely stunned by her ability to maintain a composed facial expression whilst she’s leaping about.

You can follow Hayashi’s jumping exploits – and those of her cats, which don’t levitate – on her photo blog, Yowayowa camera woman diary.

(Thanks, Graeme.)

News in brief: No, you really can't text in here

Okay, this isn’t regular Small Aperture-fodder, but it was far too good not to share. Standing up for those of us who pay to see films on the big screen without the irritation of chit-chat, mobile phones, and general unnecessary interruptions, a cinema in Austin, Texas ejected a persistent texter. The Alamo Drafthouse cinema has a no mobiles policy and the young lady had been warned twice. But anyway. When she proceded to leave a (remarkably composed) tirade of complaint on the cinema’s voicemail, they turned it to their advantage. It’s become their no-mobile-phone trailer.

This is censored version (just in case). But if you want to see the uncut, potty-mouthed version in all its glory, toddle over to the Alamo Drafthouse’s blog.

What is this? - In our NewsFlash section, we share interesting tidbits of news. Think of it as our extended twitter feed: When we find something that get our little hearts racing, we'll share it with you right here! Loving it? Great, we've got lots more News Flash articles - and, of course, we're still on Twitter as well, for even shorter news tidbits.