News

Wander - an app to let you explore the world through pictures

Did you know that there are 518 photography apps in Apple's App Store? (I checked this evening.) And that there are 222 paid-for photography apps in the Android Marketplace? That's a lot of photography-related technology floating around attempting to sidle its way into our lives. If something is going to take off and make it onto our screens and stay there, it needs to be a bit special, a bit different. Your average photo-sharing or photo-editing app just won't cut it. So I'm holding out a bit more hope than usual for Wander, which does seem to have the requisite degree of different.

I suppose that you could think of Wander as being a more technologically sophisticated version of having a pen-pal. Someone from half a world away will pop up on your screen and if you want, you can connect and then begin to share daily life and where you live through daily photo challenges over the course of a week. Maybe you'll enjoy lunch together or explore how you travel pictorially.

Your pal, or guide, might be from one of 80 countries, and the chances are that you'll begin to want to talk about things in more depth and learn more about their lives. To help that along there's linguistic support for English, Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish.

Right now, Wander is only available on the iPhone, but an Android version is on its way. The app is free to download and getting started is simple. You have to answer a few basic questions - after all, you probably don't want to be offered a connection with someone ten miles up the road - and that's it. There's a whole new world waiting to be discovered, all through pictures on your phone.

Authorities raid Olympus' HQ

I'm guessing that 'Authorities raiding the office' was pretty close to the bottom of Shuichi Takayama's, the President of Olympus', wish-list. But that's just what has happened, as a team of prosecutors attempts to get to the bottom of the accounting irregularities that have pervaded the company for the past two decades.

Japanese TV recorded a train of officials tramping their way into the office. It wasn't just Olympus' Tokyo HQ that was over-run, though. The home of ex-President Tsuyoshi Kikukawa and three offices of businesses that played their part in hiding Olympus' losses amounting to ¥117.7 billion (£960 million) were also raided.

Olympus has stated that intends to co-operate fully with the investigation and has issued an apology to its investors, shareholders, and customers for the 'troubles and worries' it has caused them. Their troubles and worries are far from over, I'd venture. Whatever the investigation might turn up, the raid isn't going to help Olympus' share prices, which have already taken a colossal hit since the scandal broke in late October. Furthermore, Olympus' revised accounts, submitted to the Japanese Stock Exchange a whisker before the 14 December 2011 deadline, have revealed a serious cash-flow problem that could prove even more serious without some rapid restructuring at the company. It's all looking a bit bleak. 

(See also the BBC and The Guardian.)

Letting kids loose with the Sakar Disney AppClix camera? Not my first choice.


Mickey makes it cute and all; but it still doesn't endear me.

Occasionally I read the spec for a product and I'm left with an overwhelming urge to try get inside the head of the designer in order to figure out just what it was that she or he was thinking when embarking on its birthing process. Sometimes it'll be a case of 'Wow! That's so amazing what inspired you?' Others it'll be a much more cyncial 'What, exactly, were you thinking there?' When someone pointed me in the direction of the Sakar Disney AppClix camera, it was definitely a case of the latter.

It's a Disney-branded camera, it comes emblazoned with Mickey or Minnie Mouse, Tinkerbell, a princess, or Phineas & Ferb. It's clearly aimed at kiddies. And I'm so in favour of getting little ones interested in photography that I'll always take notice of something intended to do just that. But this one has it, well, wrong.

Oh for sure the specs on this make it a fairly desirable piece of kit, with seven megapixels of resolution, 4× zoom, a micro SD card slot, and the ability for it to function without having to connect it to a PC, but it has one major flaw. It's designed to be attached to an iPad. Whilst it is certainly convenient to have a camera on an iPad, the iPad is in no way a convenient device to function as a camera. And it certainly isn't one that I'd thrust into the hands of an eager seven year old.

Its size, its shape, its primary function... just... no.

At $60, it is reasonable, especially because it comes with its own internal rechargeable battery, and there's a free companion editing app, too. But you attach it to a piece of kit that starts at $499.

Nope. When you've a youngun who really wants to have a go at photography, get a decent point-and-shoot at under $100 (I'm a big fan of the Fujifilm Z90), with an even better lens and video capability, too, and let her or him loose with that. They'll have a proper camera to call their own and you won't be fretting about your iPad. Everyone wins.

(Headsup to Engadget)

What now for Olympus?

If you were Shuichi Takayama, President of Olympus, what would you do now?

Olympus has just escaped, by a whisker, being delisted from the Tokyo stock exchange. The financial reports that were submitted on 14 December to prevent this grizzly fate showed an ¥84 billion ($1.08 billion) reduction in net assets, and a loss of ¥32.3 billion ($414 million) over the past six months. And as a consequence, share prices have fallen by another 20%; let alone the descent that they took between the end of October and now - as a financial scandal of epic proportions unfolded before the world - which would have made Bode Miller proud.

On top of this, your board sacked the guy who uncovered all of these financial misdealings, basically because he had the audacity to do it. Of course, he's probably the person with the nous to get you out of this hole. Sorry, crater.

Olympus is running short on cash, your net assets are currently valued at ¥46 billion, and you need to do something, fast.

You've hinted at the possibility of a merger, either in the form of a capital tie-up or an operational or sales tie-up. This would help to bring the firm some much-needed cash, but at the cost of its independence. And who would you seek out for this tie-up? Hoya has just cut loose Pentax, so has the cash, but does it have the interest, and Fujifilm is on the up-and-up. But is this going to be best for Olympus?

Michael Woodford, the CEO whom you so unceremoniously sacked in October, has been quite open about his willingness to resume a role at Olympus, but it would be at your expense. He thinks it would be best to wipe the slate clean with a mass culling of the board, and the independent inquiry commissioned to find out just what was going on in your company suggested something similar. You of course would rather stay where you are, or at least ensure that who ever is in control next is of your choosing. Does this really help Olympus?

Woodford knows that Olympus needs to recapitalise, and swiftly, but he's against any kind of merger that would threaten its independence and he doesn't want to break up or sell the company to which he dedicated 30 years of his career. Instead, he'd seek out private equity or even consider a rights issue, when existing shareholders are issued warrants to buy new stock. Would he manage it? Who knows. Who knows if the rot hasn't set in too badly and Olympus isn't beyond redemption. But maybe he has the best chance.

If you want to rescue the company that we all suspect you love, Mr Takayama, from an ignominious fate, it might be optimal if you and the rest of the board fell on your swords. It might appear a drastic action, but the situation is dire. Piecemeal offerings, the continued taint of scandal, and puerile attempts to ensure some degree of control of the company even after you've gone won't help. Go now, and go with grace.

(More on the BBC and from Reuters.)

The world's slowest fastest camera

So we get excited by cameras that have burst speeds of 60 frames per second at a resolution of three megapixels. How about a camera that can shoot a trillion frames per second? That's fast enough to capture a burst of light travelling through a Coke bottle, bouncing off of the cap, and reflecting back into the bottom. In slow motion.

It's something that Andreas Velten, Professor Ramesh Raskar, and Professor Moungi Bawendi have been working on at MIT.

Problem is, apart from costing $250,000, it also takes about an hour for the camera to capture a sequence of events that takes, ooh, about a nanosecond.

The camera that they use is a streak camera. Its aperture is a narrow slit; photons pass through it and through an electric field that deflects them in a direction that's perpendicular to the slit. Later-arriving photons are deflected more than earlier-arriving ones. But this means that the two dimensions in which it captures images aren't both spatial; one is spatial (the one corresponding to the direction of the slit) and the other (corresponding to the degree of deflection) is temporal.

So that it can record that beam of light in the coke bottle in a format that we'd recognise as 2D, the sequence has to be recorded again, and again, and again. Each time, the camera has to be moved slightly so that a 2D image can be constructed. That, of course, means that it isn't exactly useful for anything that isn't perfectly repeatable. And hence the moniker 'the world's slowest fastest camera.'

It might have the ability to make anything in the universe look slow, but it takes a while to manage it!

For scientists, the streak camera can record light passing through or being emitted by a chemical sample. But what about practical uses for photographers? One day, it might be at the foundation of developing better flashes. As Professor Raskar put it: 'With our ultrafast imaging, we can actually analyse how the photons are travelling through the world. And then we can recreate a new photo by creating the illusion that the photons started somewhere else.'


(Headsup to Engadget, and take a look at the MIT news site for a far more in depth explanation.)

Olympus' management was rotten, but it wasn't linked to organised crime

The full report is 178 pages long; the summary is 38 pages. Olympus' own investigation into just what has been going on in its company was conducted by five lawyers and one accountant. It unearthed lots of very dodgy financial transactions and a culture at the top of the management tree that resembled a mediaeval personal monarchy, but the concerns that Olympus was somehow linked to 'antisocial forces' (that's the delicious euphemism for Yakuza) seem to be unfounded.

The broad summary of just how the management conceived to cover up losses that amounted to around ¥132 billion (roughly £1.09 billion; $1.7 billion) amounts to a structure that wasn't subject to sufficient checks and balances on its activities; a culture that was intolerant of questioning (hence Michael Woodford's dismissal); an executive that ran the company almost as its own fiefdom, without consideration for the company, its employees, and its shareholders; a succession of auditors that do not appear to have their jobs properly; not making proper financial disclosures to the Tokyo Stock Exchange; and inadequate staff rotation that allowed misdemeanours to take place unchecked.

At the centre of the book-cooking were Hisashi Mori and Hideo Yamada, the former vice-president and internal auditor respectively. They dreamed up an elaborate scheme that concealed the losses Olympus had accrued from high-risk investments in the early 1990s. Through a combination of external agents' advice and Olympus' own poor management practices, they were able to get away with it for over 13 years.

It was when Michael Woodford was appointed as CEO in October, and dismissed two weeks later for rocking the boat when he asked some pertinent questions about the acquisition of a British medical imaging company called Gyrus, that the scandal came tumbling out into the public sphere. Since then, the company's shares have plummeted and it is at risk of being delisted from the Tokyo Stock Exchange, not to mention undergoing investigation by the Japanese authorities, the SFO in London, and the FBI in the USA.

Meanwhile, the investigating committee has recommended an overhaul in the senior management, changes to the company's management systems and mindset, an end to nepotistic appointments, and for those who were involved to be held legally responsible.

Doubtless Olympus is heaving a sigh of relief that nothing else unsavoury was trawled up in this investigation, but there's still a long way to go to recover their credibility and the company's share prices.

A photo competition for December!


It's a blackberry-studded chocolate meringue layer cake. (Made by me.)

So how about a bit of a photo competition? With a theme? And a prize? Yeah? Great!

Seeing as it's December, and December is my birthday month, we'll go for one of my favourite things as the theme. Food. From cake to carrots to crab. It doesn't matter if you're preparing it, eating it, or admiring it. We want something that's beautiful and clever and, well, looks good enough to eat! The winning entry receives a photo of the photographer's choice made into a gorgeous 12" Fracture.

The details are easy: one submission per person to the Small Aperture Flickr pool; the competition opens today (Wednesday 7 December) and closes on Wednesday 28 December 2011.

There are a few rules. Nothing complicated, we just have to have them. So:

The Rules

  • If you decide to enter, you agree to The Rules.
  • You can’t be related to either me or Haje to enter.
  • One entry per person – so choose your best!
  • Entries need to be submitted to the right place, which is the Small Aperture Flickr group.
  • There’s a closing date for entries, so make sure you’ve submitted before then.
  • You have to own the copyright to your entry and be at liberty to submit it to a competition. Using other people’s photos is most uncool.
  • It probably goes without saying, but entries do need to be photographs. It’d be a bit of strange photo competition otherwise.
  • Don’t do anything icky – you know, be obscene or defame someone or sell your granny to get the photo.
  • We (that being me and Haje) get to choose the winner and we’ll do our best to do so within a week of the competition closing.
  • You get to keep all the rights to your images. We just want to be able to show off the winners (and maybe some honourable mentions) here on Pixiq.
  • Entry is at your own risk. I can’t see us eating you or anything, but we can’t be responsible for anything that happens to you because you submit a photo to our competition.
  • We are allowed to change The Rules, or even suspend or end the competition, if we want or need to. Obviously we’ll try not to, but just so that you know.

If you've any questions, please just ask!

Our musically themed photo contest has a winner!


Congratulations to Bruno!

For November's competition, we were looking for musically themed photos. The theme was a slight departure from the norm, but a change can be as good as a rest. Anyway, after careful consideration of the entries (a process that can involve a lengthy exchange of emails), Haje and I settled on the gorgeous entry by Bruno as our winner.

Many congratulations Bruno! You've just won yourself a 12" Fracture. (And for those of you who've not checked out Fracture for your prints, you really should!)

Details of December's competition will be going up pretty soon!

Dear Daniela, we hate dSLRs because they're professional. Love, TfL


Here it is, fresh from my inbox, the statement from Transport for London (TfL) clarifying just why dSLRs were banned from the tour of the disused Aldwych underground station over the weekend. Please make sure that you're sitting down and do try to refrain from punching in your screen.

Terms and conditions for the recent sale of tickets to visit Aldwych Underground station clearly stated that digital SLR cameras were not permitted, as these are classed as professional equipment.

There was not a ban on taking photos during tours. However, there were restrictions on professional cameras and tripods because we were concerned that people using them could delay the tours for others, as it was a very tight schedule with more than 2,500 visitors going up and down a spiral staircase of about 160 steps to get to and from the platforms.

We wanted to make the tours as enjoyable and safe as we could for everyone. With the huge public interest in seeing the disused Tube station it was better to have the event with this restriction rather than no visit at all.

We apologise to visitors who wanted to use this kind of camera during tours to the stations.

TfL has, in its infinite wisdom - for the wisdom of a transportation authority must be infinite - classified a dSLR as professional equipment and in doing so, redefined the professional standing of millions of photographers across the globe. What an astonishing turn of events! I'm sure that all the dSLR-owners amongst us must be delighted to know that whatever your previous experience or qualifications you are now, according to TfL, professional photographers. Congratulations!

I find it even more astonishing that this through-the-lens, at-the-speed-of-light optical device also makes us slower to move through an exhibit. This is especially strange, given that the last time I checked, I was generally faster using my dSLR than my compact. Something to do with not having an electronic viewfinder, a speedier autofocus, and a more powerful processor. Maybe I need to invest in a new, professional-grade timekeeping piece to check that? Maybe that would qualify me to work at the Olympics next year? I could time Usain Bolt!

I'm not sure which type of camera TfL was mistaking a dSLR for, but I'm pretty sure that the necessity to use a tripod went out with the wetplate camera. Maybe they have one lurking down there in Aldwych station still?

I'm almost, but not quite, speechless. The general degree of ignorance and naivety on the part of people making these decisions is marvellous. A small dose of logic and some reasoned thinking, perhaps alongside a phonecall or email to some people who actually know, would have saved them from a great deal of embarrassment and the entire photographic community pointing at them and laughing.

Yes, that's right, TfL, we're all having a very sound belly laugh at your expense.


All photos courtesy of Tim Allen, and taken with his LX3.

Should you take photos everywhere?


In a recent post by my Pixiq colleague Carlos Miller, he challenges an art gallery where an art exhibition is taking place. The exhibition is a woman who is living naked in a glass box with some pigs.

Without commenting on whether it's a great art piece (I think it's a bit heavy-handed on the symbolism, myself; it sounds like the performing arts project of a high-schooler, with all the obvious connotations of gender roles, nudity, etc), the key point here is that the gallery stenciled 'Photography Not Permitted' on the glass cage they live in.

In the video in the YouTube, Miller is interviewing an animal rights activist, who wants to go in and take photos. Whilst the animal rights activist might have their own agenda, Miller writes that "I decided to head out there and hope [a security guard] would dare grab my lens. I don't play that game." In other words, he's heading in there in the name of freedom of photography.

Reasons for limiting photography

It's easy to think of a few reasons for why photography would be limited in this set of circumstances.

Photography interfering with the art experience - Perhaps the artist has identified that, in today's day and age, the impact of a hundred cell-phone cameras might destroy the impact of the artwork. In allowing photography, you might find that there are a constant barrage of flashes, or people coming up to the glass, blocking the view for other viewers.

The 'art-interference' angle, I believe, is the most likely explanation in this case; the security guard explains on video that she has her own photographer covering the event, and from an article in the Huffington Post, appears that press photos are available upon request. In other words: She is not shy about her nudity, or about being seen, naked, with pigs.

Is increasingly becoming more common to ban photography outright from art exhibits, and I don't think that's such a bad thing. You wouldn't expect to be able to take photos in most museums, for example. It's similar to why you wouldn't take photos at a theatre performance: Doing so would be detrimental both to your own enjoyment and to that of other theatre-goers. The arts (and especially performance arts, which change on a minute-to-minute basis) is there to be enjoyed, reflected upon, and thought about; a process that gets harder if you are surrounded with 300 camera phones and SLR cameras clicking away.

In this particular case with the art gallery, I genuinely can't see a single reason to take photos, other than "because they told me not to". If you need to illustrate a point, press photos are available. If you need to take additional photos for any reason, there are PR people there you can talk to to arrange a photo session that doesn't interfere with the artwork in progress.

Copyright - Another possible argument is that of copyright; since it is an art installation, it could be argued that any photos taken of the art installation would be derivative works, and therefore infringing on copyright. In this particular case, copyright a pretty weak argument against photography on the whole; as there is an news angle is in this case - that of animal rights - copyright wouldn't apply for editorial use.

Respect - It's hard to say, but it could be argued that the art exhibit is partially about photography itself: In a world where we get reality TV drivel pumped into our televisions 24/7, is it a comment on what is 'real' and what is not? Is it a comment on pornography, perhaps 'naked girls and pigs'? It could very well be that the 'no photography' sign isn't a coincidental part of the exhibit. Art is how you perceive it, and for some, it might be the exhibit. Maybe the artist is commenting on respect and the media as part of her piece?

Choosing whether to take photos of not

Personally, I think it's important that we have freedom of photography, and we should fight for it. However, with great rights come great responsibilities, and as photographers, I believe it is our obligation to be professional about how we do our jobs as news or art photographers.

If someone asks you not to take photos, what goes through your mind? Do you immediately think "Fuck you, it's my right to point my camera at anything I want", or is the thought process more intricate than that? Do you think "Hmm, I wonder why they are asking me not to take photographs" and "if I were in the same situation, how would I deal with photography?"

If we're talking first amendment rights, most of us don't graffiti walls, we don't use bullhorns at 4am in the morning, and we don't shout 'fire' in a crowded theatre. Why? Because doing either of these things would be an utterly un-cool thing to do. Destroying property in the name of the first amendment? Keeping people awake in the name of the first amendment? Causing danger in the name of the first amendment? Of course not.

The first reaction to a "no photography" sign shouldn't be to reach for your camera. It should be to question 'why', and wonder if perhaps there might be something to this request not to take photos.

To put it differently: I'm a photographer. A passionate one. But if you are the photographer who causes a huge brouhaha by deciding to take photos at an event or a location where you've been asked not to, I will think less of you. Why? Because you're making all of us look bad.

Photo Credit: No Photography (cc) by Banalities on Flickr.

Dear Transport for London, why do you hate dSLRs?


Tim's photo, taken with a compact camera

One day, someone will be able to give me an answer to the question: 'Why have you made the arbitrary decision to ban digital SLRs from your venue/ exhibit/ event, but no other type of camera?' It's a question that I seem to have to pose quite a bit, and today it's the turn of Transport for London (TfL) to attempt to respond.

What's prompted today's round with reticent PRs? Tim Allen, a Kent-based photographer took a tour of the fabled Aldwych underground station yesterday. The station's been closed for years, but it's used for training and even in films (think V for Vendetta) and very rarely, TfL will open it up to the public, at a price. When you're going on a tour of a disused underground station, taking a few photos wouldn't exactly be out of the question, would it? Except that TfL won't let you take them with a dSLR. To quote the sign outside the station yesterday:

Due to their combination of high-quality sensor and high-resolution, digital SLR cameras are unfortunately not permitted inside the underground station.

Really? So I can't walk in there with my Canon 450D, but waltzing in with a Fujifilm X-S1 (when it's released, obviously) would be absolutely fine? What on earth would they say about some medium format yumminess? And I guess that they'd have no objections to a series-topping range-finder, either?

How in the name of all that is photographically beautiful do they manage to dream up such ridiculous distinctions? And if one person dare say to me it's because dSLRs constitute professional equipment, I shall be forced to deposit the PR from every entry-level dSLR ever produced on her or his head. From a great height.

The ignorance, or maybe naivety, of these people astonishes me. If they are attempting to prevent images of their property from commercial exploitation, then prohibiting the use of dSLRs in their vicinity won't make a blind bit of difference. If they're intent on irritating anyone who owns an SLR, they're going about it just the right way.

The equipment that you use doesn't define you; and Juno and Minerva, just because you're a professional photographer it doesn't mean to say that on your day off you might not happen to enjoy taking the odd photo of something that interests you.

Thankfully for Tim he didn't turn up with his dSLR yesterday, he went for a slightly more pocketable compact camera. And he still took some photos that are now plastered all over the intergoogles.

I am, naturally, still waiting for TfL to respond to my telephone call. It's a good job that I'm not holding my breath.


Update!

And yes! There's is an update! You can read what TfL has to say for itself - and just what I think of them - over here!

Shoot a headline; win a prize!


I loves me a bit of street photography, so when the details of a December-long contest specifically for street photographs landed in my inbox, I sat up and took some notice. Especially when it's a comeptition that respects photographers' rights (the rights remain yours; all yours) and has a decent prize to boot!

It's been organised by Thomas Leuthard, a Swiss photographer whom you might happen to know by his moniker 85mm. He takes some impressive street photos and wanted to inpsire others to have a go, too. So came about the December 'Headlines' competition.

Yep, all photographs need to include a headline of some description. It can come from a newspaper, from a shopfront, from a carrier bag... whatever. Being a street photography contest, they need to be candid shots, which is pretty obvious, really. And it has to have been taken in December 2011, too.

Thomas has also added a couple of extra rules to get you to think about your photography a bit more. All entries need to be black and white and square format.

When you've taken your photo, you submit it to the 85mm contest pool on Flickr, with its EXIF data intact, geo-tagged using the Flickr widget, and without any watermarks. It's one submission per person and then its a case of waiting.

The pool will be closed on 31 December 2011, after when Thomas and the four other judges will choose their favourites, with a $500 prize going to the winner.

All the rules and regulations are up on Thomas' site, and if you've any more questions, he'll answer them over in the discussion threads in the Flickr group.

What are you waiting for? Get snapping!

The best thing about Movember...


Movember 2008

I participated in Movember again this year, which turned out to be a tricky one; they don't seem to have heard of Movember here in Argentina, which is awkward, because my deliriously ironic moustache really, really shouldn't be taken too seriously. When I'm wearing top-lip-fluff, I look more like a child molester than most, which clearly explains why I haven't been able to make that many new friends here in Buenos Aires.

Having said that, it's good for one thing; Photography! There's something rather refreshing about scarcely recognising your own face, which means that it's a lot easier to be inspired to partake in some photographic experiments...

So have a leaf through the gallery above. Feel free to laugh at me all you like, but if you as much as titter, you have to click on this link to learn a little bit more about Prostate cancer. Because, well, that's the whole point of walking around like Freddy Mercury's bastard son for a month...

The 1-second film festival


You've taken hundreds - if not thousands - of photos in your life. Some of them will have had exposures of longer than a second. 10 seconds, perhaps? Maybe even a minute? Telling a story in stills photography is mighty hard, but what if your assignment was different? What if your mission was to create a short film, that could be a maximum of 1 second in length?

That's the premise of the Seconds of Beauty photography contest:

 

Seconds Of Beauty - 1st round compilation from The Beauty Of A Second on Vimeo.

Magnificent, eh? I'm inspired, now where did I leave my Director's hat?

(via the ever-awesome PetaPixel)

Where hypocrisy and stupid collide - trying to take photos at an event in London's Hyde Park


Oh no! You can't take that photo sir! It's got a child in it!

Whilst perusing the website of a well-known British photography publication this afternoon - shocking, but true, my eyes are not for Pixiq's alone - I stumbled across an intriguing article that's set me off on a minor mission. The article reported how a group of amateur photographers from the Chingford Photographic Society (Chingford is a north east London suburb, for those whose geography might be more accustomed to New York than London) had been asked to leave the annual Winter Wonderland extravaganza (for want of a better word) in Hyde Park. Their gross infringement? Photographing some children having fun.

Apparently, the parents of the afore-photographed children were feeling a bit uncomfortable about some guys and gals with a few cameras having fun themselves and taking photos of the people there - adults and children alike. So they reported them to the resident heavies, who asked them to leave. Now, in the UK if you're in a public place you have no reasonable expectation of privacy, which means that you're fair game for photographers of any ilk, be they professional or amateur, worthy of winning l'Iris d'Or or downright terrible. Whether or not an event being held in a Royal Park falls under the auspices of the public or private sphere is debateable, but it wasn't really that which set me off on my investigative trail. As if I don't have anything better to do on a Tuesday evening. It was the PR person's response to our worthy rival's request for a comment. Here's what she had to say:

Our security team had received several complaints from parents that this particular photography group were taking pictures of the children without their consent. As the photographers were not accredited, they were asked to leave.

We request that all photographers from the media and photography groups be accredited before entering Hyde Park Winter Wonderland and adhere to our rules, one of which includes not taking pictures of children.

Yeah, the consent bit riled me, too, but let's set that aside for the minute, okay? The issue is the demand for accreditation and the rule concerning not photographing children. You see, after very careful scouring of the Hyde Park Winter Wonderland website, I can't find any mention of the press or of photography groups needing to have accreditation. There's nothing on the Terms and Conditions page, which would be a pretty obvious place to start. The FAQs section is silent on photography entirely. And the Press section does little more than blow the park's own trumpet. Nothing, nada, niente, nix when it comes to restrictions for photography groups or the press.

If you happen to be wondering, photography in Hyde Park is entirely permissible for non-commerical purposes. Want to make a Hollywood film there? You'll need to get permission first.

As if this hasn't already raised my hackles that love nothing more than a touch of attention to detail, it was point 16 of the terms and conditions that have left me in a state of astonishment.

Please note that CCTV and film cameras may be present at the Park. By entering the Event and/or purchasing Tickets and attending the Event, ticket holders consent to filming, stills photography and sound recording (and its use in distribution (commercial or otherwise) without any payment.

Yes, you are reading that entirely correctly. Little Johnny or Rosie's picture can be sold by PWR, the company that runs Winter Wonderland, with no recourse, no comeback, no payment, and no proper signed and dated model release, and the parents are perfectly happy to agree to that, because without doing so they wouldn't be in the Winter Wonderland in the first place. It's part of the terms and conditions, don't forget.

I can't quite decide which side of this equation is most galling. Is it the sheer stupidity of the parents who were so quick to complain about other people at the event taking photos of their children enjoying themselves, but didn't see an issue with the event not obtaining proper consent or model releases if they want to sell their children's images commercially to any Tom, Dick, or Harry? Or is it the utter hypocrisy of the event organisers who will happily boot out a few photographers who weren't necessarily focusing their almost certainly non-commerical photographic efforts on any specific children and instead were taking photos of people generally having fun, but don't see any problem with them filming and photographing everyone and using the images commercially if they feel like it?

Whichever one it is, my brain can't quite contend it right now.

I have requested a comment from Hyde Park Winter Wonderland, but as yet, nothing has been forthcoming. Should that change, I will of course update you. For the moment, however, I shall attempt to wrap my head around people being asked to stop taking photos for absolutely no good reason.

(And our worthy rival's article is on Amateur Photographer)

More resignations and now FBI-involvement at Olympus

Watching the corporate goings-on at Olympus unfold before our eyes is akin to watching the dance of the seven veils: it's constantly tantalising and lurid, there's a sharp intake of breath with the removal of the next layer as we can't possibly imagine that there's more to come, but betcha-by-golly there's yet another piece of diaphanous frippery to taunt and confound us. When we do finally uncover it entirely, we'll be far too exhausted from the constant state of enticement that we'll collapse in a heap rather than revel in our accomplishment.

So if sacking the newly-appointed CEO for an alleged clash of management styles when he'd also just happened to uncover finiancial misdealings of epic proportions, denying any wrong-doing, then admitting that things weren't right, seeing Presidents and Vice Presidents resign, unearthing even more alleged financial naughtiness, and watching 70% be lopped off the company's share price weren't quite enough, here's what's happened at Olympus this week.

First, Tsuyoshi Kikukawa and Hisashi Mori - who had already resigned their posts as President and Vice-President respectively, but had somehow managed to hold on to their board posts - have now resigned from Olympus entirely. Hideo Yamada, the company's auditor has also stepped down, after the new President Shuichi Takayama laid blame squarely at his - and Kikukawa's and Mori's - feet.

There's been a concerted effort on the part of Olympus employees and share holders to re-appoint Michael Woodford, the guy who orignally pointed the finger at vast financial irregularities at Olympus and was promptly sacked for his efforts, to the role of CEO. I can't see that happening; every board meeting would resemble a wedding breakfast where the bride's parents haven't spoken in twenty seven years, and then the mother was scattering the father's belongings over the front lawn from an upstairs bedroom window and calling him a dirty, cheating scoundrel in front of a crowd of astonished neighbours. (You can choose who's who in this glorious tableau.)

Woodford has spent the past week in Tokyo, where he met with Olympus' board and spoke with Japanese authorities investigating the goings-on. As if hiding huge losses throughout their accounts wasn't enough, there've been rumours of Yakuza involvement amongst all of this, too.

Next week, Woodford will make his way to the United States where he'll meet with the FBI, who, in addition to the Serious Fraud Office in London and the aforementioned Japanese authorities, are trying to unpick this mess.

Olympus must submit financial data to the Tokyo Stock Exchange by 14 December or it runs the risk of being delisted. In fact, even if it does submit its data, being delisted is still a possibility. That's how miserable this situation is.

I think I'll give the final word on this installment to Woodford, though: 'It's like a John Grisham novel this whole affair… and then if you understand all the nuances and tentacles it really is.'

(Headsup to the BBC and Amateur Photographer)

2012 Sony World Photography Awards return to London

After four years sunning itself in Cannes, the Sony World Photography Awards tried out London this year, and it seems as if it found the climate agreeable: the awards are set to return to London for their 2012 incarnation.

Events kick off on 26 April, with the swish and swanky awards ceremony, followed by the - likely even swisher and swankier - gala dinner at the Hilton Hotel on Park Lane. Over the weekend 27-30 April there will be a few select events taking place, as well as the winning entries from the awards being on display at Somerset House.

From then until 20 May, there is a jam-packed programme of talks, seminars, workshops, and exhibitions planned for anyone who has the slightest interest in photography. How about four nights of conversation with some world class photographers, including the recipient of the Sony World Photography Awards Outstanding Contribution to Photography, as they tell their stories and share their experiences?

Maybe you'd prefer a workshop session that helps you to take better portraits? Or you could spend an evening sipping a glass of wine and pondering some of the photos in the exhibitions at the Wine and Critique session.

That's just a few of the highlights. Keep an eye on the Festival Programme page to see if anything else piques your fancy, and you can pick up tickets here.

Fun with high-speed photography


An early attempt at getting it right

Some of you know that I've spent the past six months or so creating an awesome photography gadget - the Triggertrap. We're currently in our very last phase of testing (exciting!!), and as part of that, I've been doing some really cool high-speed photography stuff:

20111125_img_9133_2000px.jpg

Awesome, eh?

I did a little video explaining how everything works, too:

 

If you'd like even more info, check out the in-depth article over on Triggertrap.com.

Behind the scenes of Photographer's i


One of the strengths of iPad over normal magazine, is that you can look at more photos up close than ever before

This week, a brand new photography magazine came crashing onto the scene - but it's a photography magazine with a twist. Embracing the awesomeness of the iPad, multiplying it with an experienced production staff, and what do you get? The Photographer's i.

I was one of the contributors for the first issue (proudly, I might add), but apart from submitting my article, I wasn't really involved with the rest of the magazine - so that's why I'm interviewing the executive editor, Marti Saltzman, to find out some more about the Photographer's i.

What is it?

"Photographers i is not like any other photography magazine because it starts from a different premise", Marti says. "It  offers innovative content in the form of text, photos, video, and audio—not as gimmicks, but as fully integrated elements that add up to a uniquely informative experience. You can hear and see articles come to life in a way that simply is not possible in print. You can also interact and play with overlays, move things on the page, etc. Hearing a photographer’s voice as you view his work gives such insight into their creative process—it becomes a personal experience, as if they are speaking to only you."

Of course, none of this would have been possible in the static medium of a print magazine. In addition, there are other technical advantages to the iPad - the screens found on Apple's tablets (and, to some degree, on other tablets as well) are absolutely ideal to showing off photography: It makes photos look beautiful in their full detail.

"One of our up-coming contributors said that looking at photos on an iPad was like looking at a full size transparency on a light table", Marti laughs. "How good is that!?"

Focusing on photography - not on gear

It isn't just in terms of the format that the Photographer's i is doing things a differently. Many photography magazines stay current by writing about news and equipment, but the P-i has chosen to take a different approach. As you're exploring the mag, it quickly becomes obvious that the people behind the magazines come from a book-publishing background: There's no reason why the Photographer's I shouldn't be as relevant in six or eighteen months as it is right now.

"Our concern," Marti explains, "is with the art of image making."

It's a great choice, in my opinion: there's little point in reading a 6-month-old issue of most photography magazines, but as you're reading, watching, and listening to P-i, it becomes clear that it's more of a short book covering a series of fascinating photography topics, than a magazine in its traditional sense. Personally, I saw it as a series of short-stories.

Creating Photographer's i

The project - published by Ilex Press - has been a long time coming, Marti says. "We developed the Pilot issue over the summer. I would say that it took about 3 months to put it together. It was a lot of work, but very fun. The people I worked with were a great team of amazingly talented people. It was one of those innovative "skunkworks" projects that came together because we were all committed to photography and new forms of publishing."

"We chose contributors based on their work and their reputation. Our goal was to curate an interesting issue in which every article would be different but all would follow our model of being primarily about a passion for image-making." Marti explains.

"We looked for a variety of genres, ages, genders, and approaches—not only approaches to the photography, but also to what they wanted their article to present to readers. Some of the articles are instructional, others are more contemplative; and a few are just plain fun."

It wasn't all fun and games however - it's a lot of hard work to get the appazine out there - but it seems as if the people who created it did it right. In publishing and design, there's an inarguable truth: People are willing to suffer bad design for good content, but they won't suffer good design for bad content. Or, put differently: Content is king. In P-i, it seems like they got the focus right:

"The hardest thing in my opinion was getting the content right. After all, that is what we ultimately would be judged for and we wanted it to be the best it could be. On the other hand, we wanted to make contributing fairly easy for people because we were working with top-level professionals who have many other things to do in life. So there was a balance to strike. We wanted to put out something that met everyone's high standards—theirs, ours and the reader's." Nothing new about any of that, but it wasn't just a new stack of content they were producing: "But then add in the challenge that we were reinventing the wheel, so to speak. It was difficult to communicate to people what we were trying to create because there was no way to show it to them."

There are other magazines created especially for the iPad that leverage the platform's strengths - Wired is a shining beacon in this respect, for example - but in the photography sphere, it's slim pickings. Most of the traditional magazine publishers have created iPad versions of their magazine that are basically digital versions of the paper magazine. That's the worst of both worlds: You get the static nature of a magazine, but you don't get the 'strokability', the smell, or the 'connection' that you get with a paper magazine. In my opinion, that's exactly where the iPad is so strong: It is possible to create something that is better than a traditional magazine, but it means you have to understand and embrace the platform.

"This was in many ways a new experience for all of us too. Even after we built an article, we couldn't really show it to contributors other than with static pdfs, which didn’t do it justice", Marti says, shrugging. "Even crazier, we had to lay it out in both vertical and horizontal viewing positions, which made the layout process even more complicated."

More complicated, perhaps, but it's delicious to be able to turn your iPad 90 degrees and see the design change right in front of you - some times to a form that's easier to read, often with the outcome that the pictures show up bigger on your screen. Fantastic!

"I finally showed the magazine to some of our Pilot-issue contributors at the PhotoPlus show in New York and everyone said the same thing: 'Now I get it.' It was a lightbulb moment. This is now easier because we have an issue available. We have had a couple of future contributors buy iPads over the weekend so they could see what we are doing."

Whilst some things were predictably hard - getting the content spot-on, and developing for a new platform - other things turned out to be easier than expected.

"I thought that it would be difficult to get people to truly appreciation what we were hoping to create. That was not the case. I was wowed by the comments I got from all sorts of people since we went live, just wowed. I have never received such thoughtful, positive, unsolicited feedback like this for anything else I have ever been involved with", Marti says, uncharacteristically quietly, as she's re-playing the feedback in her mind. "People seemed to understand what we were trying to achieve the minute they looked at it. I am still awed by it. Also, working with Graham Davis, our Art Director made everything easy. He is a real professional. He did a fantastic job and was helpful and supportive through every second of it."

Highlights

I asked Marti what her favourite part of the app-a-zine was, and her face showed that she didn't like the question in the slightest.

"That's mean!", she exclaimed. "That's like asking a parent which is their favorite child."

michael.png

"I love almost everything and, when I look at individual articles, I say to myself, 'This is the greatest.' Then I look at another article and say the same thing. Overall, I think Michael Freeman's Shooting the Tea Horse Road article has the best of everything that we were trying to do—video, audio, overlays, photos, etc. Not surprising as Michael, who is also our Editor-in-Chief, is just amazing and a very, very talented photographer."

romano.png

Leafing (or should I say "stroking"?) through the Photographer's i, she comments on a few more pieces, but settles on her second top-favourite feature as well. "I really love the Romano Cagnoni feature. It is because, as a war photographer, he is so passionate about what he does and you can hear this passion in his voice and witness it when he smooths out that big print with his hands. He also had a real empathy with his subjects—those Chechen soldiers, with their humanity. Plus, you get to know him a little when he talks about the Ho Chi Minh picture that he photographed during the Viet Nam war. His photography is amazing and was shot under incredibly difficult conditions and he is amazing too — brimming with passion."

"The public reception has been fantastic", Marti says. "We have exceeded our initial expectations and, as I said above, I am thrilled by the feedback we have received. Once readers download it and see it, it 'clicks'. They realize this is what they’ve been expecting in a tablet magazine. So I hope that trend continues."

"The sales have been great, too. We've already sold more than we expected on iPad, but less than we had hoped for on Android." There are changes in the market, though, especially with Amazon's Kindle Fire throwing down the gauntlet for other tablet manufacturers. "We’re looking forward to Amazon’s next expected tablet release, which should be a game changer in its own right."

What's next?

The team have had to cut a few corners here and there - the Apple approval process has been less than easy. "It was mostly small stuff, though", Marti says - but adds that "it would be disingenuous of me to say that there weren't a few frustrations..."

It would be easy to see why; and the first issue of the magazine didn't make it into Apple's Newsstand, for example.

"We absolutely plan on getting in Apple’s Newsstand.", Marti says, and looks a little rueful. "This is an internal issue with Apple that we are working on", she says, diplomatically.

With that out of the way, Marti turns her attention to the dreams - "I do think we have certainly come a lot closer to embracing the power of the iPad than most people who are publishing magazines on tablets—most of which are simple pdf conversions of their print editions, ads included. The whole idea with Photographer's i was to embrace the multimedia and interactive features from the get-go, because that’s what readers are eager for."

Printed magazines cost more than P-i, and tend to have loads of advertising in them. How was Marti and her team able keeping the app reasonably priced without adding advertising? Is there a plan to add advertising in the future?

"Think about it. Magazines are printed - paper and ink are costly these days - and shipped to distribution centers all over the world. Fuel isn’t cheap. All of this has to be packaged and handled too, even with automated systems. Then the magazines are mailed to subscribers' homes. Can you imagine how much it costs to proof, print, bind, label, and ship - not once, but twice - a magazine? Therein lies the answer. The internet is our entire infrastructure, and somebody else takes care of it for us. This is one of the reasons why iPad is the future..."

The team has been rather swamped with creating the pilot version of P-i, and has been in 'start-up' mode for the past three months. Now, things are changing, and they've started looking up and outward a little bit more.

"A lot of fantastic photographers are making great use of Twitter", Marti says, "including some of our contributors. We want to use it too, and reach out and talk directly with our readers. You can follow us on @photographers_i and on Facebook but please be patient for now - we're still figuring out how to best use social media as to complement the magazine."

Photographer's i is out now, and a new issue will be available for download bimonthly. Check it out!

Hopes dashed on 360 Panorama's Android release


Android development was delayed for the 360 Panorama app.

Interesting; very interesting. There was a teensy bit of excitement earlier today when the easy-to-use stitch-free real-time panorama app from Occipital, 360 Panorama, was made available for Android users running Gingerbread (version 2.3) and upwards, as well as its adoring iOS fans. 360 Panorama has a 4.5 star rating in the App Store, you see.

The thing about 360 Panaorama is that it's supposed to be super-easy to use: all you have to do is launch the app, sweep around in a smooth-moving tight circle, et voila! One real-time panorama ready to email to your Mum so that she knows you're not living in squalor or share directly Facebook or Twitter to make your friends jealous of the view from your roof garden.

But since it was made available in the Android Market earlier today, there have been reports of crash after crash after crash and plenty of people are complaining that it isn't compatible with their devices, in particular the Samsung Galaxy SII. And this comes after Occipital delayed the development of an Android version, citing performance issues in the Android OS; it simply couldn't keep up with the app. Now it seems as if it still can't, much to the disppointment of quite a few users. I say 'quite a few users'; complaints and one-star reviews are amassing by the minute on the Android Market and there have been vociferous complaints on TechCrunch and Engadget, too.

Hopes were so high for this. It seems such a shame. What went wrong?