Photography Theory

100 awesome flickr streams


Don't get cocky, now...

100 best of Flickr

My relationship with Flickr goes back a long way; all the way to late 2004, in fact. I kept going back out of curiosity, deciding it’s not for me, and then leaving again. In the meantime, I spent a lot of time on PhotoSIG (but I decided the community was a bit too hostile for my liking) and Deviant Art (awesome, but too childish on the whole), before turning back to Flickr. Again.

My cycle kept going on until 2008, when I realised the community feel of Flickr had grown strong enough to be un-ignorable. By January 2009, I had collected a lot of amazing Flickr streams; and I wanted to share my finds with you guys. 50 amazing flickr streams was born.

I don’t know about you, but January 2009 seems like a very long time ago, so I decided that perhaps it was time to revisit the concept. Of course, 50 flickr streams had already been done. What could I possibly do to top that? Why, I’m glad you asked.

Ladies and gentlefolk; in no particular order (apart from, y’know, alphabetically)…

100 Flickr streams made of pure awesome

Abhinav shoots spectacles, not the optical type but the spectacular type like the Commonwealth Games in Delhi. Look at this amazing comp of the ceremony which captures the scale of the event magnificently and, using a higher ISO I guess, Abhinav also captured this beautiful shot, rich with color. Staying with his marvellous sense of color this balcony shot has an “Arabian Nights’ quality to it and finally, who would have guessed that one could create something out of this location. Very cool stuff!

Airgartens’ Flickrstream is not as prolific as most, but it’s a very good start. There are ‘bohemian’ undertones to her style of photography, a captivating decadence. People appear to be living in a make-believe world of stage make-up and costumes. Harsh light throws dark shadows on white faces. There are people trapped in bubbles, immersed in water and seen through shiny plastic, also some great surreal set ups too. Clever use of props and lighting create a wonderfully imaginative world.

Andy gets some really different styles going in his portfolio which is really very absorbing to browse. Check out the jump from this beautifully composed shot to this leap of imagination, very cool. And here, once again a masterful comp and capture. Not shy to experiment and explore digital boundaries, this iPhone shot processed in Photoshop is yet another example of his innovative style. There are a many more, take time out to catch up on an inspirational browse.

Anrapu has a great eye with a fish-eye lens, which is not one of my favorite lenses unless used in the right situation, but Anrapu certainly puts it to good effect here. The definition he gets is outstanding and the coloring very rich, in fact the National Gallery shot is almost comic book-like. Browsing through his other pics I was particularly impressed with the clarity he achieves, this rock pool shot is a good example, quite intense.

Antonio Merini is an exceptionally talented photographer. In fact ‘photographer’ is the wrong word to use for a man with the ability to draw out such emotion and depth of feeling from what are, essentially, a lot of cold pixels. Figures appear half-formed and vague against incredibly textured backgrounds and sometimes they appear to be seen as if in a window reflection or an imperfect mirror. Tangible textures overlay his photos and combined with his dark, rich color sense, create a viewing experience that leaves you ‘touched’ in some way.

Artie Photography has an HDR series in his portfolio so I’ll select a few takes from there. The two I like most are the field and the seascape. I’ve included the plane as an example of taking HDR a little too far I think. For HDR fans he gives a breakdown of his workflow which is always worth checking out. He also has a number of OOB shots, however this style of presentation is no longer a photograph for me, it’s moved into the realm of graphic arts. All in all some very exciting work from someone who likes to shoot ‘n share.

Ashu Mittal has a sensitive feel for her subject that really comes through in her work.The festive colors of India, beautifully captured in all their exuberance, sit side by side with exquisite flower portraits in her portfolio. Shallow depth-of-field smudges color and shape into a satisfying background palette. Not only has Ashu a keen eye for color and detail, she also has a sense of the occasion with her insightful comments. Her work is a visual feast with shots that intrigue and inspire.

Atavachron has a varied collection of work on his photostream. I particularly liked his feel for landscapes and wished there had been a lot more. Note the graphic quality of his shots in these pics for example, great comp and light. I’m a sucker for great texture and Atavachron has some really cool shots like this bridge texture, boat and tree. Some of his other pieces show the trademark of someone who is not afraid to experiment.

Bizarro has an enviable talent when it comes to capturing skin-tones. This particular shot blew me away with its’ ethereal atmosphere and lighting set-up… the face has the quality of fine porcelain and the light just striking her back is masterful. His other work deserves equal praise too for different reasons. Portraits that could have easily turned out quite banal have been captured with an unusual effect/lighting to lift them from the ordinary. Way to go Bizarro!

Bluresque brings a visually different feel to photography, some of his shots remind me of the American illustrator Brad Hollands’ magnificent art. The smudged color and unfocused shapes he achieves create a sort of ‘other’ world, a world just on the edge of reality. There is a blurred line between his color and shape, they appear to become inseparable, the one becomes the other to create an air of mystery. Bluresque deconstructs the perfect world of digital photography to the point of suggestion, a sort of non HDR reality.

Brett Walker is another innovative photographer whereby the capture of the shot is only the beginning. His numerous overlays and juxtaposition of unrelated images create a fascinating if not unsettling body of work. His Meatsucker series in particular. It’s not all weird though as his talent reveals itself in some acutely observed ‘character’ shots. The depth of tone Brett manages to capture is quite extraordinary and brings new life to B/W.

Bumble-Bee has a very mixed selection of shots to her credit. There are some great location shots of abandoned building interiors/model but I have already covered a similar body of work elsewhere. I really liked the coloring and texture of this old Gazebo with its’ wintery feel, The abandoned asylum shot is stunning, everything comes together on this, even to the wet road, to portray the grimness of the location, great compo. The other pic that appealed to me was this floating figure I wish this idea had been developed further, it’s very intriguing.

Cabbit is a photographer with many sides to his work. What impressed me immediately as I flicked through his shots was the range of subject matter he handles with comparative ease. Very cool black and white pics with great tonal quality also there are some finely seen portraits and candid shots of friends and others. Out of the studio and away from controlled lighting set-ups he reveals a documentary style with a reporters eye. Short technical specs are generally given with each shot.

Cadchapela comes across as a very experienced shooter with a great mix of shots to his credit. Get this pic up and check out the tonal quality of the study… then from there jump to this sea scape, amazing. But we’re not done yet, I’ve saved the best for last, one can only admire the sheer elegance of this composition. Basically the diversity of his work and the discipline required to achieve this level shows an amazing control and understanding of the medium.

Carlotardani is a man who shoots everything… horses, people still life, kids, happy snaps you name it. He also has a Flickr portfolio packed full of images that will amaze and amuse. However Carlotardanis’ strength lies in his landscapes, they are without doubt stunningly beautiful. Apart from the logistics of finding these out-of-the-way locations and choosing your spot… waiting for the right light requires the discipline of a Jedi Knight. As a photographer you should see this, whether you’re into landscapes or not.

Cept_id, unlike many other photographers who have a distinctive ‘look’ about their work, seems to waver between photography graphics and art, not that it’s a negative observation. In fact I would like to see a whole series of this Francis Bacon type imagery with his acidic colors or the minimilist landscape feel. The “graphic” style has been explored and represented more fully in his portfolio and is very striking, a digital form of scraperboard… ( ask your grandfather what the word means ). It’s incredible what a bunch of pixels can do in the right hands.

Chenroom, I hope that’s his name, ( not brushed up on my Chinese lately ) has captured the definitive cloud shot I have seen in awhile… wonder how he got his flash heads up there? Love the blue! Chenroom is no slouch when it comes to capturing great sky shots, this one is pretty cool… day on one side and night on the other. And finally, another nicely seen comp, with a great sky need I add, is this one. Looking at Chenrooms’ profile I see he lists some great gear that he puts to good use for the rest of his portfolio.

Chloe Gauntleys’ photos have a gentle classical appearance, almost romantic ( especially the later images featured here ). Her earlier work has a harder more illustrative edge to it with an an overtly surreal approach and appears to be the foundation out of which this newer, softer style has evolved. Multi-layered images and textures play a large role in the final comp. She has a wonderfully exciting imagination and infinite patience in order to create these complex and often thought provoking images. Let Chloe take you on a magical journey.

Daphne Kotsiani‘s landscapes evoke a feeling of loneliness in me. I have seen plenty of desolate outdoor shots, however their technical brilliance generally dominates and overshadows the emotional aspect. Daphne imparts a nostalgic feel to her work… birds wheeling in the sky, a lonely horse in the mist or an old tree surrounded by water all speak to me of fragments of time, all fleetingly seen as if from the window of a passing car. I can still remember standing on an open plain and gazing up in silence at the towering clouds.

Delphine is a digital surrealist artist with a very delicate touch to her work. I have only featured a few pieces here from her main stream but take a look at her series entitled “Another World”, very absorbing. Her captures are a mix of digital manipulation and photography, almost 50/50 I would guess, but she achieves a gentle ‘story-telling’ look which is a pleasure to view. There are down-to-earth shots too in her porty, but I would say that this lady has a very impulsive creative spirit that wants to fly.

Douglas Griffin roams the highlands of Scotland taking us to places we would otherwise never see. Lonely castles silently speak of another era, while storms rage on deserted shores, unseen and unheard. It’s only this landscape photographers’ dedication to his subject matter… and others like him, that reveal these remote locations to us. Read the descriptions that accompany each shot and you soon realise Douglas had to plan ahead to get the best light. Great stuff McDouglas!

Duarja is an artist, there is no question about it and one look at this shot will convince you of that. He captures an unbelievable texture of nostalgia in his work, almost timeless. One can almost feel the silence in this shot of a simple washing machine or hear the wind whispering on the wind bent grass in this beautifully composed landscape. And once again the style of the “dutch masters” springs to mind. Duarja has created a very unique “old world” style of capturing images in todays digital world.

Dubonnet is definitely a “flower child”, maybe not in the ‘sixties’ sense but photographically speaking. I liked his straightforward approach to capturing these delicate forms. Obviously aperture is crucial with plants that are sometimes only 1 inch across and finding the most satisfying composition amongst a profusion of shapes is no mean feat. I particularly liked the compo and tonal qualities on this one. If botany is your passion then check out his ‘Lensbaby’ set, there are some nice creative captures.

Ele Noir‘s quirky sense of cut and paste photography appeals to me immensely. For her it’s not a case of seeing photography as an art, it’s more like seeing art as photography. Her graphic approach has a naive/Warhol feel about it, however Ele is no novice, underlying these seemingly thrown together images is a very strong sense of design and conceptual thinking, the camera merely becomes a brush to convey the paint to the canvas. Fresh and original.

Entelepentele is essentially a portrait photographer – strikingly seen faces are a feature of her Flickr stream. Gently mixing image-manipulation with some of her work brings an introspective quality to the piece, another aspect I liked was the color/tonal variations she has running over certain portraits, very innovative processing! This cheeky capture is almost Flemish in style with her bobbed hair and rouged cheeks, but for many of the other images moody lighting brings a beautiful brooding atmosphere to her portfolio. Her work is a sort of back-to-basics approach… very nice.

Federico Bebbers’ portrait portfolio, using the standard head and shoulders framing, captures an incredible range of facial expressions and emotions with minimal props and effective lighting. Fragmented faces, bandaged faces, contorted, sad, wistful… all stare out at you from their digital prison. Portraiture is a genre not seen that often and Bebber really explores it in depth with competent image manipulation and varied styling. Sometimes it’s like looking into a mirror, there are days when you feel exactly like this.

Fesign is a multi-award winning photographer, National Geographic 2008 and Press Photo 2008 amongst others. His work is exceptional even though image manipulation does play a part in the final result, in his own words… “To me, photography is all about the final image, regardless of the journey, whether it is through a traditional medium or image manipulation. To capture the perfect shot, there should be ‘no limitations’ on one’s creativity”. And yes, creativity should have no bounds so enjoy the journey and the destination.

Fifi Patchouli is a photographer/model in that she shoots herself a lot, though not in the foot. She explores a wide cross-section of photographic styles and seems to enjoy just inventing scenarios. I love her self portaits and off-hand approach to her work, underlying this approach however is a serious side, as many of her pics are artistic accomplishments and could have easily fallen into the ‘happy-snaps’ category. Her work has been published in magazines and she is widely followed on Flickr.

Fr Antune takes us on a mountain hike in this series of shots. We’ve had cityscapes, landscapes and now you can check out some cool mountainscapes. Antune is clearly no armchair photographer, he gets out there with the wild mountain thyme and captures some very rewarding views. His work is very “clean’ with no evidence of ‘over processing’ that can sometimes take precedence over the natural beauty of the subject. A lofty view of the world that not many get to see, you can see it here, like me, from your armchair.

Greg Easton is a lensman who knows how to set a mood – rich colours leap out at you from moody backgrounds, industrial settings set the scene for great lighting set ups. And check this out… Greg also shares some great advice from time to time with mini-tutorials on how he adds a “look” or “weathering” effect to his pics. Not shy to hide his talents or advice Greg sure knows how to make color work to his advantage. Cool dude.

Heather Smith‘s imagery is reminiscent of the Romantic Period in art. Her love for photography stems from “that certain slant of light”, or a melody that evokes a visual response. Her philosophy is to tell stories with her pictures, stories that come from life, like recently discovered old postcards, their images frozen in time. A much-loved project of hers is the “My Beatles” series of which the Lady Madonna shot is the latest addition at the time of writing. Her Flickr stream should definitely be bookmarked and browsed at leisure.

IHP has a set in Flickr called “Depopulated Landscapes” which is essentially shooting architectural detail. The architects vision is generally seen as a ‘whole’ on completion, however IHP believes that there is a certain graphical beauty in many architectural settings that surround us and he sets out to explore this. Its a revealing and rewarding exploration as he captures some exquisitely beautiful shapes and colors on the journey. We often hurry in and out of buildings taking them for granted, IHPs’ creativity makes us stop and see them with a more appreciative eye.

Irma Haselbergers’ images reach back into the past with their monochromatic tones and two-dimensional rendering of light and dark shapes. Understanding B/W photography is essential to the art of photography, as concepts of shadow detail, contrast, tonal range and highlights are best understood by studying black and white images. In this Irma has excelled, for example, in this shot color would actually detract from the cold, overpowering ‘greyness’ of the day. Her shots carry the feeling of real life about them, unlike the shallowness of glossy color magazines.

Jamie Heiden is an artist with a camera, in that her work appears more as ‘painted‘ art than photography. Her series of mid-west barns will amaze you. Using freely available textures, the original photo is overlayed with them in Photoshop, then using blend commands to the point of deconstructing or redefining the original photograph another effect is achieved. An exceedingly innovative technique, pioneered by Jewell, texturing and custom brushes bring a wonderfully naive look to the photo.

Jayphotoworks‘ stream has a pretty interesting addition that I’ve not seen elsewhere. Check out this shot first, nice capture… and the birds are a great touch. Now browse to this shot. This is the unretouched/out of the camera pic with Jays’ explanation as to how he arrived at the final image in the form of a mini Photoshop tutorial – very cool. One more thing… mood he created with this series and would have liked to see more. Nice!

Jeff Gaydash is a photographer who loves to shoot digitally and experiment with different post-processing techniques. An example of his vision is seen in this shot where he attempts to age his Piezo prints and replicate that look in the digital file as well. Sometimes I feel that digital photography can be too intense in appearance and deconstructing this cleanliness can achieve a very satisfying end result. Jeffs’ Flickrstream contains some very well observed subjects, he has a good eye for composition and, combined with a strong graphic sense, has achieved a portfolio well worth a visit.

Johnny loves a sunset and his Flickr stream has some stunners. A number of his shots have made the ‘Explore’ page on Flickr so take time out to explore for yourself. His landscapes are generally dawn or sunset takes and are ablaze with color, on some pics he makes mention of using Lee Filters but unfortunately doesn’t expand on his experience, this sort of info always helps the aspiring photographer. Landscapes take up a large percentage of his portfolio which includes HDR and manually blended shots, well worth a viewing.

Jone Reeds’ grunge style of fashion photography is incredibly striking with it’s Warhol type silkscreen/solarised color effect. Two shots in particular caught me immediately… this one with its’ electrifying colors shimmering in the light as if on a soap bubble in the sun, and the bathroom comp with it’s exceptional coloring and texture. Magnificent. The bulk of her portfolio is a mix of varying styles and subject matter, all worth a look just for the sheer diversity.

Kakhabad is a young Japanese female photographer with a very refined and delicate approach to her work that only the Japanese seem to master. Beautifully styled subjects and low key lighting impart a serene atmosphere to these fashion shots. However the Japanese flair for intricate detail is beautifully captured in this delicate pic. Her work appears to be mainly fashion based but there are some very nice landscapes and a fair amount of surrealism. East meets West on Flickr and it is a refreshing experience to say the least.

Kantryla tackles architecture with a dedication one can only admire. If you read the accompanying text to some of these extremely elegant shots you’ll realise he stayed the distance waiting for the right light, or the clouds to break, or tried again and again shooting the same building to get exactly what he wanted. When I visited her flickr site he was on holiday and no wonder. Kantryla has created an ethereal world out of steel and glass.

Karto Gimeno takes the ordinary and turns it into the extraordinary. Looking through his work is like emptying a childs box of toys, all manner of objects spill out… broken dolls, stones, faded pictures, drawings, the list goes on. Assembling them into highly imaginative compositions Karto creates a fascinating series of still life, sometimes overlaying them with childlike drawings. Could he be the recurring figure of a little boy doll with striped shirt we see in many pictures? He also captures landscapes with an equally creative approach. Note Fellinis’ red ball in this.

Kevin McNeal, a nature photographer based in Washington State, has a philosophical approach to his work which he tries to impart to the viewer. Nature has fleeting moods, he says, and is never the same twice, by attempting to capture these ephemeral states and share them he hopes to make people more aware of our fragile planet that most of us take for granted. Well his shots have got me convinced, thick rich color permeates his work creating some eye popping contrasts and visual treats. One of the best I would say

Kevmex68 is a digital artist in the romantic style. Beautiful old world images float in shades of pastel colors on misty landscapes, almost ethereal. These images are conjured up from archival shots originally taken by Kevmex, then, using self-taught techniques in Photoshop he recomposes the scene with layering, opacity masks and selective lighting. No HDR is involved. For all aspiring landscape photographers I would urge you to browse this unique series of images. Full color prints are on offer from Kevmex so what are you waiting for!

Lomokev is a real ‘freewheelin’ shooter, his flickr stream abounds with a cross-section of shots that intrigue and amaze. Lomokev is actually Kevin Meredith, Photographer, Teacher and Author. He is the originator of the ‘Street Style Montage Portraits’ with his almost irreverent style of photography… it’s more like a streetwise photoblog style. Nevertheless there’s some excellent work here. Look at the life he brings to this in what is essentially a simple shot. Lomokev appears to be a very busy man attending phoot camp, giving talks at Google and holding exhibitions.

Lucimas’ bodyscapes ( as opposed to land/urbanscapes ) are a welcome find as not many photographers exhibit or even shoot highclass fashion. Studio fashion shots are entirely dependant on the lighting skills of the individual, unlike outdoor photography where one is subject to the whims of nature, and Lucima is obviously very skilled in his craft. The skin tones on his B/W captures are as smooth as silk with sculptural tonal qualities. Imaginative poses and equally beautiful color shots make this a visually exciting viewing opportunity.

Luis Chacon captures people beautifully. There is a Cartier-Bresson like quality to his shots, a sort of ‘decisive moment‘ approach. His Flickr stream consists mainly of B/W, some very tasteful duo-tone and color portraits. The color work is beautifully seen and I was very taken by this shot, for me it is the embodiment of all that is Spanish… the red against the dark ground, the styling, etc. Even the composition is classic, just look at the relationship of the door frame to the subject, how it contains and holds your eye on the figure, masterful!

Manlio_k has a sort of retro/fifties airbrush look with a lingering feel of old postcards and slightly washed-out color about his work, ( if you know what I mean ) which looks really cool. It never ceases to amaze me how different photographers manage to draw out of a landscape a completely different interpretation to the next guy, and Manlio’s captures are exceedingly different. There’s a painterly quality about them that’s hard to define, in the ‘hayfield’ pic I kept looking for brush strokes! It’s true. Check it out.

Marc Benslahdine creates landscapes you can breathe in. With his stunning evening shot entitled “When The Lake Catches Fire”, you get the sense and stillness of the dying day etched in superb tonal values. Mood is essential in landscape capture and a good photographer can make even a bare stretch of water come alive. Marc definitely has this ability, plus a sense of timing to be at the right place at the right time. His work is like a breath of fresh air!

Marta has a magical or mythical quality to her work, she conjures up wonderfully imaginative fantasy scenes, almost dreamlike. I studied the more complex shots trying to figure out how one would approach these set-ups, as everything just falls into place beautifully, the look, the light, the angle ….very cool. Included in her Flickr work are “Mosaic” sets which appear to be experimental, however they certainly don’t have the elegance or conceptual ability she is so obviously capable of. Check it out for yourself.

Mattijn is truly a master of his digital craft. I spent ages poring over these shots, completely absorbed by the detail, the lighting, the concepts and the creative wizardry employed here. Clearly Photoshop has a part to play but the conceptual work is not the work of a computer, it is the sheer artistry and genius of Mattijn. Whether you like fantasy or not you will browse through this mans entire work. Some set ups may work better than others, but the one thing they all have in common is Mattjins’ magic touch.

Matt Toynbee is almost in a class of his own, his mono and split tone work is absolutely superb. The sheer graphic quality of this pier is nothing short of amazing, shot with the famed Canon EF 80-200mm f/2.8L Magic Drainpipe. But what really caught my eye is the silky smooth water and steel grey tones of the sky. it doesn’t get much better. Matts’ capture of Kingsgate Castle is masterful in his choice of POV and as for the cloud formation he must have friends in high places. Excellent.

Meghimegs’ compositions and unbelieveable colors have got to be seen to be believed. The human eye contains three types of color receptors, each receptor responds to a different wavelegth of the color spectrum, Meghimegs’ work exceeds these bounds. As you browse through his portfolio the colors leap out and assault your cone cells. Shadow areas fall into dense black which further enhances the extreme color feel. Not all his work is captured in this fashion however, so it’s safe to venture forth and leave your sunglasses at home.

Mendis takes photography to another level… the insect level. As we all know photography is a passion, however, specialised photography is that and more. It is a love for your subject matter and infinite patience which will reward you with a shot like this. Technically, this type of photography requires pin sharp focus ( check out the depth-of-field on this, awesome ), spotless lenses, rock steady mounts and split-second timing. Unlike a studio shoot, you are working in an unpredictable environment. Nature calls and Mendis answers.

Michael Greene‘s landscapes really make me want to get out there and do outdoor photography for myself. The clarity and coloring of his shots imparts a sense of the smell of dust and Desert Lavender and the crunch of your boots on the gravel. What I always find fascinating are the descriptions these outdoor guys give on how far they go to get a particular shot, not easy. However, breathtaking views and beautiful colors are clearly Michaels’ well deserved reward.

Midnight-digital‘s shots are a futuristic blast. Sci-fi does not appeal to everyone but if you love innovative photography and give credit to visionary set-ups and ideas, then take a look at the shots I’ve posted here. This post-apocalypse shot is nothing short of art with its’ Magriitte-type bowler hatted figure. Stunning comp. Midnight-digital is also a published photographer whos’ work has appeared in magazines and on CD covers. For the second time this year he won the 1st prize ( B&W category ) in the french photo magazine “Réponses Photo”.

Miguel CDs’ landscapes are like plunging into a refreshing mountain stream. Vivid primary colors etch abstract shapes onto a distant hill. A lonely church sits in a field of brilliant yellow, reminiscent of Van Gogh and the Eilean Donan castle at dawn is a classic landscape capture. These and many other images are part of an impressive portfolio of work by Miguel. Follow him on his journey through the stunning beauty of Scotland its a trip you don’t want to miss.

Miss Loisy has a very entertaining and extremely colorful Flickr stream. Not shy to clash colors as loudly as possible she brings a very fresh, exuberant and noisy look to photography. Her series of ‘Fight Girls’ is a little rough for me, but painfully interesting. Miss Loisy also likes to startle and amuse, I love the colors on this take. As always there is a serious photographer hiding behind all the dayglo colors and her talent shines the brightest of all.

Mistybliss is the mother of six children so what better subject matter to use than your kids! There are absolutely gorgeous portraits of her children to be found on Flickr. Using a Canon EOS 5D Mark II and an EOS 40D Mistybliss demonstrates a natural feel for portraiture. Check out how a well-used lens flare can add something to a quite ordinary shot, great! But it’s not all kids and family, Mistybliss puts her stamp of creativity on the inanimate too, proving that true talent will out.

Mr Flibble is a really serious photographer that you can only laugh at. A crazy sense of humour and great conceptual thinking combine with a very competent shooter to create a fresh body of work. Mr Flibble is no slouch when it comes to Photoshop either, in fact many of his shots rely on it which in no way detracts from his photographic savvy. Jokes aside though, Flibbles’ serious side goes unsung because while were chuckling at his humour were not taking in the great lighting set-ups he achieves or the detail in the styling… serious stuff!

MutantRock has a heavy metal style of photography that comes at you loud and clear. Here’s a photographer that doesn’t pull any punches, check out his great gritty black and white pics shot live, no posing here, you either get the shot or you don’t. Equally impressive are the color photos, and you can almost smell the leather in this one. But don’t think it’s all just hard rock, there is a softer side to this artist… architecture and portraits, would you believe! Great shot.

Nasa is obviously not strictly “a photographer” in the true sense of the word but certainly deserves a mention in the annals of photography. A lot of the shots are clinically observed, more “for the record’ than artistic merit, yet who can deny the beauty of colliding galaxies, the breathtaking views of Earth ( to go boldly where no landscape photographer has ever been ) a cannibal star or the sun in all its’ majestic power. Technology has changed the face of photography forever. Once we were amazed at the attempts of Joseph Nicéphore Niépce, now we capture light from billions of years ago.

Night photographer as his name implies shoots a lot at night. Great stuff here with time delays, tilt-shift and loads of experimenting. The man has a fetish for phone boxes and produces some stunning versions with very funky lighting set-ups. Also check out his skateboarding light painting series ( yes, all done at night ) for some amazing effects. Night photographers’ talent however doesn’t only shine at night, his Flickr stream has daylight portraits and conventional set-ups too – all competently handled.

Nikkidelmont as photographer and model, takes mainly figurative shots of herself and others. The female form as a work of art and on public display has been an ongoing debate since Adam and Eve but I must agree with Edmund Burke ( 1757 ), who sees the female form as “potential perfection”. Well, Nikkis’ photos would certainly please Edmund, as she certainly achieves perfection in her outstanding series of beautiful self-portraits with skin-tones smooth as silk and striking poses. When you’ve got it, you’ve got it. And she’s got it!

Olivier Burnside has a great many shots on his Flickr site that show how incredibly versatile he is. Check out the ambiance and comp in this street scene ( I love the way the light blows out at street level and how the buildings go dark at the top ) and the minimalist approach in this shot. He has a superb graphic sense of composing and draws something exceptional out of even the simplest of set ups. Simple but effective photography.

Paul C Stokes is another landscape photographer, but not just any old landscape shooter, this boy has really got some serious captures. What impressed me the most is the purity of the light and air. The compositions are very clean and the angle and depth of field are extremely well considered. Browse to the shots you like and you’ll find Paul has taken the time to share his set-ups with you, plus a little bit of history. They say ‘composition’, the ‘quality of light’ and ‘exposure’ are the defining keys to great landscapes… well, whoever ‘they’ are must have just seen Pauls porty!

Paul Grand does some very classy still-life … and I thought the world is moving so fast, no-one would have time for still-life anymore. Well, here’s Paul. One of my favorites is this shot, I love the use of space as it’s always a temptation with still-life to get in close for the textures. Space, like silence, can say more. With his landscapes Paul works in the old ‘pictorialist’ fashion utilising Flypaper textures in many of his shots, probably as a reaction against the perfect digital imagery that proliferates today. Grand work Paul!

Peterspencer49 is a sea/landscape photographer with exceptional ability. This shot of Kimmeridge is one of my favorites, he achieves an almost oily/liquid feel to the water and rocks in the foreground. It’s a great comp with beautiful colors. Here’s another masterpiece, the elegance of this shot can only be admired, awesome. Moving away from seascapes check out this take of a location in Dorset, the camera is set up on the faint tyre tracks in the grass leading your eye further in. Might sound obvious, but how many take time to recce the area for the best angle, especially when under pressure. A true pro.

petiteChose‘s surreal portfolio is definitely worth a lengthy browse. It’s virtually impossible to discuss the shots in conventional photographic terms however as they begin to transcend photography, which is not a problem for me as I love a visual feast. PetiteChose has a wonderfully unfettered imagination, a great eye for color, composition. texture, and has loads of talent.

Photomas’ journey to Nepal was not only a photographic journey of discovery but also one of ‘discovery of the self’. Her sensitively seen portarits of this mountainous country are incredibly revealing. In photos of the older people a timeworn past stares back at you, most strikingly captured in this shot. Children stare wide-eyed with all the innocence of youth and older men look inward with all the wisdom of their years. Browse her Flickrstream and take this journey yourself.

PhotosEcosse captures moody landscapes and to understand the conditions relating to this particular set featured here, in her own words… “A set to illustrate the qualities of Northern Light, as experienced in the far North West of the Scottish Highlands. Not easy terrain to negotiate, and the fleeting light can last but seconds. You have to be fast to capture it, it can be a challenge, but a rewarding one.” Fleeting light and difficult terrain are just a few of the challenges that every good outdoor photographer deals with but only the great ones overcome.

PhotoSenseDatum shoots elephants in India beautifully, photographically speaking that is. She is concerned with human/animal rights, the preservation of the Earth and is a member of many photographic groups. These worthy sentiments are expressed in her diverse portfolio as she captures street scenes in India or the wind-swept plains of Mongolia. Her journey takes us to other countries like India, Africa, Portugal, Greece, China and many more… the pics are generally ‘out of camera’ images with minimal photo-manipulation. PhotoSenseDatum is a very busy and creative soul who uses her talent to enlighten and amaze.

PrairieEyes wanders the back roads of historic Alberta searching for small towns that time has forgotten. And find them he does, boarded up and overgrown but still standing as a reminder to modern day wanderers of their heritage. PrairieEyes captures these wooden structures with a feeling of affection, and to enhance the historic aspect he ‘ages’ his takes with textures. The old barns and silos are reminiscent of Andrew Wyeths’ paintings in particular ‘Weather Side’ and ‘Christinas World‘. Browsing his portfolio is like taking the back roads.

Rastaschas has some very excellent black and white shots to his credit. The grain/contrast in this genre always seems to bring a ‘lonely’ element to the work, in that the high contrast values appear to alienate the subject from his surroundings… color fills in the gaps. Because it’s pretty easy for B/W to look flat, Rastaschas has chosen contrasting light and strong graphic shapes with isolated figures critically positioned to lift the pic. Check how the light in this shot points down the stairs to the foreground figure. Great vision!

Rebecca Parker in another era would have been a painter maybe Vermeer or a Rembrandt with her classical style of photography. Some of her formal studies have a medieval quality about them… their deep shadows and single source window light remind me of Vermeers’ “Girl With A Pearl Earring”. Exterior shots are handled with the same ‘feel’ and attention to detail. This girl one could imagine bumping into at the local country fair on the arm of a Morris Dancer. Beautiful work my fair lady.

Red Mouse portrays the ‘ordinary’ in a unique and individual way. Scenes the average photographer would walk past, while searching for that perfect sunset, Mouse turns into art. He has a natural eye for abstraction and uses the visual language of line, form and color to create compositions which exist independently from visual references of the world. Abstraction indicates a departure from reality, yet when we see these images we say… Hey! I can do that… well Red Mouse has done it, he has turned garbage bags into art.

Robbie Swans’ photography stream is a laugh… not technically that is. Swans’ brand of humour mixed with his excellent work makes it a worthwhile browse. With this shot, taken with an iPhone, he captures a beautiful box Brownie 127 feel ( complete with light leak ) … you’ve got to see it. His other amazing captures using conventional gear, are at the other end of the scale in terms of lighting and tonal values. For example there is no HDR on this magnificent comp, just pure talent and the same goes for this. Go on, have a laugh!

Robb North has managed to capture a melancholy air with his photos. One almost senses the atmosphere of a late Sunday afternoon as the shadows lengthen in the fading light and the breeze gently stirs the grass. Or the lonely silence of someone waiting for a footfall that will never come. The way light falls at a certain angle can trigger these emotions in sensitive people. Robb has managed to capture this light, along with the serenity and solitude of his locations.

Rustyphotography is back with a very dark series featuring abandoned buildings, incredibly dramatic skies press down on decaying walls and a feeling of utter silence permeates the shots. Once again here’s a body of work that needs time to study with care as there are some unbelievable captures. With no specs available one can only speculate on the dynamic range that has been combined into a single file, still it gets my HDR award. Rusty is definitely back, was he ever away?

Sarah Sitkin has a refreshing imagination that runs riot across her portfolio. Vivid images tumble across your eyes as you scan her work, Often one has to enlarge a piece and study it to admire the thinking process behind it or wonder at the time it took to set up before the first shot could be captured. However it’s not all a mad hatters tea party there is a serious side to her work too. I still think she eats sugar coated pixels for breakfast.

Servalpe covers urban landscapes with a passion. If you are into the tech info on set ups, locations and HDR workflow techniques, this is definitely the site to browse. Although Servalpe outlines his approach in shorthand form it’s still valuable info for those who wish to achieve this level of expertise. Servalpe is an extremely competent photographer with some very impressive captures to his credit. Analysing his work, one can see that he chooses his subject matter with care in order to arrive at his initial vision. A Pro.

Shexbeer has produced an absolute goldmine of rich, moody shots in the Potters Manor House Series. There are not enough specs accompanying the shots but natural light seems to be the order of the day. Shexbeer has captured a dark brooding quality to the shadows, with daylight picking out the details. The toilet capture could be the first toilet shot to be classified as art! Excellent stuff, almost surreal. I realized afterwards that I hardly even looked at his other work but I will go back!

Sigi K, shooting in the wilds of South West Africa produces some very interesting work. Surrealism sits side by side with conventional shots’ that show a very strong creative force at work here. She has an enormous diversity of styles and deliberately imitates the photographic techniques of her other Flickr contacts in order to expand her processing/photographic skills and knowledge or IOL as she calls it (Imitation Of Life series ). Sigis’ captures are a visual delight plus her list of Flickr contacts are a goldmine of creative expression.

Silke Seybold. I absolutely adore Silkes’ work for the graphic quality she brings to it, and I love how the textured borders echo the feel of the locations and enhance the concept. Although some purists would dismiss her style as a form of graphics, here’s a shot that shows she’s a photographer with exceptional ability. In fact one needs a lot more space to discuss and go through her work as I have not touched on the color aspect, nevertheless take some time and check it out for yourself.

Snailbootys’ images have a very strong ‘Dada’ philosophy underlying them. Ridiculing the meaninglessness of the modern world and anti everything, Dadaists used an early form of shock art to carry their message. Snailbooty with his over-active, fertile imagination and inventive set-ups appears to be applying the same tactics by ridiculing the technical precision and clarity of digital photography. Experimenting in an ‘anything goes’ fashion, he has created some truly amazing images. A free-wheeling portfolio that’s definitely worth a browse.

Solarixx has a wild and very compelling portfolio. Her style veers across different genres creating waves in their wake. Some of her B/W work reminds me of the avant-garde photographer Man Ray, these images are very powerful and to a degree disturbing. Solarixx is obviously touching a nerve in the human psyche. Browse her work and you’ll find a restless enigmatic spirit here searching for a way to satisfy her creative curiosity. You like, you don’t like. Me, I like.

SoWhat captures minimalist landscapes ( eg. one tree in a vast field ) beautifully and with all this empty space around it’s very soothing to view.This type of compo however relies heavily on a good sense of design, coupled with great lighting conditions for it to work successfully, and SoWhat pulls it off neatly. There are also some cityscapes on his site which show a wonderful feel for light and framing, I absolutely love the light in this capture, for instance. The rest of his porty is a mixed bag but worth checking out.

Stella Brazil is a lady that shoots beautiful ladies, beautifully. But that’s not all she shoots beautifully. Bright eyed children, pottery, food, portraits, landscapes… all caught in captivating color, there are definitely no language barriers here as her photographs speak for themselves. I was particularly drawn to her photos of the Brazilian women, not merely for their exquisite features, but for the softness and quality of the skin tones she has managed to capture. No matter the subject, Stella Brazil brings the feminine touch to her work.

Stevacek has a couple of shots in his flickr stream that border on scenes from a big budget sci-fi movie. These are beautifully conceptualised surreal views of objects that are basically mundane. Other works in his photo stream include domestic animals… portrayed in a very unique way, cars and landscape/architecture. He achieves an amazing richness and depth to his color, and coupled with a very ‘graphic sense’ of composition he arrives at an impressive body of work.

Steve Rutherford has a very clean style of capturing, almost clinical. Using just one model and simple locations he has managed to create a very slick feel. I particularly liked the tonal look of this shot, the framing is great and I had to look twice before I noticed that the young man was in the air. He also shares some ideas on his lighting set-ups and thought process behind the motivation for the shot. His choice of model is superb, as somehow I don’t think the intrigue would be there if this was Harry Smith ( sorry Harry )… most inscrutable!

Ste-peg has some unbelieveable pics of industrial decay here. Where this man finds all this stuff is beyond me, are there that many abandoned pieces of real estate standing around falling down in silence? Nevertheless, I was totally absorbed by it all and went slowly from one shot to the other trying to imagine what sort of life went on there, and the people … did their hopes and dreams begin and end there? It’s a very varied and moving series with many great natural light set-ups and textural qualities. Check it out you’ll be amazed!

Surrealize brings yet another look to landscapes. I must say I’m staggered at the variety of interpretaions that one finds in this field. However before we look at that, check out the beautiful colors in this shot, the water reflection moves this compo to another level, great. Surrealize continues with his incredibly vivid treatment with this cityscape and towards the end of his comments under this shot he gives some interesting tech details. The Tower is comprised of 9 different bracketed exposures to achieve this effect, really cool! What I really like about some of these guys is the inside info they’re willing to share with you plus an insight into the way they work and think.

TheWalkinMan sure had me crawlin’ all over his work. I found some very intense portraits there which left me amazed at the detail, ( for a moment I thought they were super-realist paintings ha ha ). Caitlin is a honey, isn’t it incredible how this pic actually captures the childs personality… maybe life imitates art! Still staying with the portraits, because I feel this guy gets it right, I was also knocked out by the tomato shot. Look at how the red pops, very intense… mmm, are you sure these aren’t super-realist paintings?

Velvet‘s Flickr stream is exceedingly diverse and a little bit difficult to pin down, she has a reportage type feel to her work generally but what I really liked is this pic and the thick color she has achieved here. Some of her offbeat portraits appeal to me like this one which would look amazing as a fashion mag DPS. Then there is a lovely moment captured here. It would be great to see this portfolio edited down, some great work is being swamped.

Visualechoes takes us on a breathtaking ride with a photo stream packed full of car shots ( some bikes and a few girls too ). It’s refreshing to see someone so dedicated to a particular subject that he explores it again and again with night shots, rigs, sunsets, dawn shots etc… you name it. Cars can be hell to shoot as so many elements come into play, for example unlike landscape photography, movement adds another dimension to the capture. Plus the many different facets and reflections require a discerning eye to capture the essence of the design. You don’t have to be car enthusiast to love this.

Walkinginspace creates his own visual language with some awesome architectural shots. These are not conventional photographs of buildings however, Walkinginspace has selectively composed his photos to create an abstraction of color and form, in fact, the color and form become the subject of the composition. His work is fascinating in that ordinary buildings of no architectural significance are imbued with a stylish elegance, he sees beauty in a balcony and form in telephone wires. Thanks to Walkinginspace I’ve come to realize we are surrounded by works of art.

Weirena captures flowers unlike any other photographer I have encountered. Her incredibly delicate photographs, once captured, are then enhanced with soft layers of background textures, borders or other images for which she displays a natural flair. Nature has its own HDR as this beautifully seen composition shows and the sunflowers rival Van Gogh’s palette. Weirenas’ work is a welcome respite from abandoned buildings and, I am sure, she would agree with Claude Monets’ sentiments who once said, “I owe having become a painter, to flowers”.

Wink shares a few short processing tips with us on his Flickr site that’s worth checking out like this Photamatix and Topaz comparison of a raw shot ( Straight Out Of Camera ). He has a good eye for composition as can be seen by the following shots, these set-ups are essentially very simple but look at his interpretation! Wink also experiments with a $50 fish-eye for fun and comes up with some pretty cool shots. Lots of interesting stuff on his site that’s worth a view.

Xaomenas’ still-life gallery is like an invitation to the studio of a Dutch master in the Golden Age. Much like 17th Century still-lifes, the objects portrayed are essentially mundane but it requires an outstanding technical and creative skill to bring these compositions to life. Xaomena has that skill plus a superb eye for light and form. Still life is a genre not often found on Flickr so I would take the time to travel back with her to the 17th century.

Xavibarca‘s pano shots of Hong Kong are a technical and visual triumph. For those of you who are interested in this genre of photography this is not only a visual experience but a rewarding insight into the pano approach, as Xavibarca gives invaluable advice from his own experience in the field. The colors and clarity are stunning and he achieves a seamless whole from what are essentially different frames/exposures ( sometimes up to 15 different exposures ). The rest of the portfolio is equally impressive as he carries through his wonderful color sense and ‘look’ to create a cohesive style.

Yannick has a very inspirational and highly imaginative set of shots, combining his photographic expertise with Photoshop he manages to capture some unbelievable images. There is a flawless quality to his work and he seems to enjoy sharing set ups and tech info, which is invaluable advice coming from a photographer of his calibre. Photo-manipulation appears to play a big part in the more unconventional captures which doesn’t detract from the viewing experience. Well worth a browse.

Phew

Phew, that was quite the list. I guess all that’s left for me to say is that if you want to take a look at my stuff on Flickr, go right ahead – do say hello, and I’ll have a peek at your Flickr stream, too!


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

What is shutter speed?

When we’re thinking about exposing our pictures correctly, there are three variables to consider – aperture, ISO, and shutter speed. All of these have an effect on how light or dark your picture is, as well as affecting other aspects of your photo. We have looked at the effects of aperture and ISO in previous articles, so it’s time to consider shutter speeds, and what lowering your shutter speed can do to your pictures.

What do you mean by shutter speed?

To get to grips with what shutter speed is, we need to know what a shutter is. And to do this, it helps to understand the very basics of how a camera works. Light enters a camera lens, travels into the camera body and is recorded as an image when it hits the sensor (or film) in the back of the camera. The amount of time the light is allowed to hit the sensor for is controlled by the shutter; a piece of metal or fabric that opens and closes when the picture is taken. The slower the shutter speed, the longer the shutter is open for. Get it? Okay.

What does this mean for your pictures?

Well, two things. First, the longer your shutter speed is, the longer that you’re letting light hit the sensor – which means that your picture will be brighter. This is great news for taking pictures at night, as you can correctly expose dark scenes without having to use flash. As long as you’re photographing still objects, that is – the second effect of slow shutter speeds is that whilst a shutter is open, all movement during this period is recorded. This means that photos of people in dark rooms can be out of focus if slow shutter speeds are used without flash.

Long Exposure

Long Exposure, by Danny Wartnaby

How can I control it?

Try changing your camera from Auto mode to either Shutter Priority mode (‘TV’ on a Canon camera; ‘S’ on a Nikon) or Program mode (P), and experiment! For most long shutter speed work, a tripod is necessary, as it allows you to ensure that your camera isn’t moving whilst you’re taking your pictures. This makes sure that any static objects in your photo remain in focus.

Be Creative

Using slow shutter speeds, you can get some amazing effects – I’ve always loved photos featuring light trails and more recently have become amazed by shots of star trails, which use exactly the same premise as capturing the trails left by car headlights. You can also use slow shutter speeds to create fantastic panning effects.

A Haunted Trail

A Haunted Trail, by Joshua Debner

I’ve chosen just a few examples, but there are plenty more ideas out there. So what are you waiting for?

All photos used in this article are used as ‘fair dealing‘. If you have strong reservations against your photos appearing on Small Aperture, please contact us, and we’ll get them taken down. Please support the artists creating these photos by clicking on the photos to take a closer look at their work!

In photography, rules aren't laws.

You will never take my Coffee away from me!!

The internet is absolutely full of guides about things you should and shouldn’t do to take ‘good photos’. Don’t over-expose. Remember the rule of thirds. Don’t cut people’s heads off. Watch your background. Use a shallow DOF in portraits to throw the backgrounds out of focus. 3-point lighting for portraiture, etc.

A lot of us just take all these rules for given, as if they are hard-and-fast rules that you have to stick to, because if you don’t, you’ll fail as a photographer. Break these rules, and you won’t take a good photo in your life. Your cat will die, your children will hate you, and your significant other will divorce you.  

 

Truth, as you might expect, is slightly different. Don’t get me wrong, most of the time the ‘rules’ (which in any case should be seen as mere guidelines) make a lot of sense. Of course it looks silly if you cut people’s heads off. Of course your photos won’t look conventional if they are harshly over- or under-exposed.

Rules aren’t laws. You can break them unpunished

Grossly over-exposing a photo doesn't have to mean it won't look good. (click for bigger on Flickr)

Read the sentence above. That’s all I really wanted to say with this article. So if you’re in a rush, or you think I use too many words to say something simple, then read that sentence a few times, and go check out XKCD for a while.

What I’m trying to say is that while the guidelines are there to help you, there’s no point in following any rules or guidelines unless you fully understand (or grok, if you’re geeky and/or well-read enough to be familiar with that concept) why.

The best reason to understand why a rule is there, is to break it. Some times, you might find that your photos actually come out more interesting – better, even, perhaps – when you break the rules. Other times, you’ll try to take the same photo twice; once whilst following the rule, and once whilst breaking it, and you’ll realise why it’s a good idea.

Just remember: Never follow a rule just because you’ve read somewhere that it’s the ‘right’ thing to do. Follow it because you understand it, and because you know what happens when you don’t.

Break these rules

Contrary to popular belief, your foreground doesn't have to be in focus (clicky for bigger)

A couple of examples

DO cut their heads off at the top if it makes for more interesting and intimate photos (click for bigger on Flickr)

The Carlsberg Express: Of course your horizon doesn't have to be straight, if a non-straight horizon gives you better results! (click for bigger on Flickr)

Sometimes, getting in closer makes a photo more intimate. Don't be afraid to crop into people's faces.

The horizontals aren't horizontal. The verticals aren't vertical. The background is a mess. How could this photo ever be any good? But it is... (click for bigger on Flickr)

White balance? Hah? I spit on your white balance. (click for bigger)

Some times, the background adds to a photo - don't throw it out of focus on principle just because you have a nice, fast lens.


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

The 25 best of urban decay

udecay

I’ve got a guilty pleasure which I’d like to share with you guys – I love urban decay photography; I can spend hours on end browsing Flickr galleries tagged with Urban Decay… Brilliant stuff. I was talking about this particular style/subgenre of photography with my good friend Dave Feltenberger a few months ago, and he was enthused about collecting some of his favourite photographers and sites.

So, if you’re still left wondering what this whole ‘urban decay’ thing is all about… Here’s your chance to be flabberghasted!

Take it away Dave ‘Seinberg’ Feltenberger:

What is Urban Decay, and why bother with it?

Although it’s unfortunately becoming somewhat of a hip buzzword in certain areas of the photography community, Urban Decay remains a powerful subject matter for almost any medium. There’s something irresistible about these scenes, whether they’re urban, rural, industrial, or any human institution. Who lived there? What sequence of events led to the failure of this endeavor and to such a state of disrepair? The stories these places have—imagined or real—lead us to ask more questions and to be amazed by the smallest things. With age, decay, and a certain anonymity, something as simple as a reception desk at a hospital suddenly assumes gravity not matched by many feelings in our everyday experience. You wonder what the receptionist was like; the person’s feelings, ambitions, fears; finding a cheesy romance novel in the desk drawer blows your mind and you think, “Wow! Someone was actually here reading this!”

Well, so what? So somebody was sitting at a desk reading a book 50 years ago — why is a fleeting moment from an insignificant receptionist desk 50 years ago interesting? It seems like it shouldn’t matter, but these are feelings and thoughts that occur on encountering scenes of Urban Decay! What is it that makes Urban Decay so fascinating?

There’s simply the element of age, of course, just as pictures of New York in the roaring ’20s or Paris at the turn of the century are interesting. But Urban Decay is different: it has the age element and something else. I think at the heart of it is the jolt we get when we see human endeavors fail. Not in the way the Germans use the word schadenfreude—to delight in the failure or misfortune of others—but in fact the opposite of that. (I wonder: do the Germans have an antonym for schadenfreude?). In seeing Urban Decay, we have the gut understanding that we’re all in the same boat, and that everything ultimately decays. It takes constant effort to fend off the tendency of things to decay—but we know in our bones what our fate is, and the entropy of Urban Decay puts us face to face with it.

Whatever the feeling is for you, I hope the images collected below evoke some interesting feelings or if nothing else have a certain type of beauty that you enjoy. Oh, and the ordering is incidental; not meant to signify rank or importance; and similarly, there are surely other great examples out on the web, so this is to whet your appetite. Enjoy!

The 25 best of urban decay

1.) Ray Mortenson, Untitled

Urban Decay

Ray Mortenson is sort of an Old Master when it comes to Urban Decay. He doesn’t own a computer and still shoots film (never shot digital). The image below is in a show of 1980s Bronx Urban Decay photography he’s having at the Museum of the City of New York right now.

I love the image here: a bull’s eye saying, “Here. This is where it’s happening.” It’s perfect as a political statement, too.

2.) John Feckner, Broken Promises

John Feckner is probably more well-known than Mortenson, and he photographed the same subject matter: Bronx Urban Decay in the ‘70s and ‘80s. But while Mortenson quietly sat on most of his photos for years, Feckner made it a political issue and created images that struck a chord with more than just art school kids. And he’s still doing it.

Urban Decay

3.) Richard Nickel, Jr., Untitled

Okay, okay. I promise that not everyone will be from New York. But, uh, Richard Nickel Jr. is another New York photographer. There isn’t a lot of information available on him other than a short article from the New York Daily News, and his name is probably a pseudonym based on an early Urban Decay photographer named Richard Nickel, but Jr’s photography is certainly top-knotch. This photo is great in lots of ways; the framing is clearly meticulous: everything lines up perfectly. The light falling off to the left of the frame, the completely dark room ahead of us begging us to peek our head in. Beautiful.

Urban Decay

4.) Troy Pavia, Posts

I’m personally not the biggest fan of the other-worldly colors Troy uses his flash and a gel to make, as I think it can distract from his great photography that stands on its own, but no matter what way you look at it his photos are excellent. Others tend to love the colors so he’s a must on a list of great Urban Decay photos. Oh yeah, except he doesn’t shoot Urban scenes all that often—it’s usually some secluded town, highway stop, military base, or junk yard out in the California or Nevada desert—but Urban or Rural, the feeling that ties this subject matter together isn’t the dense population!

Urban Decay

5.) Mike O’Hara at Phattire.net, Sleeping

Full-disclosure on two fronts: first, Mike is also a New York photographer. And second, he’s also a close friend. His being a friend doesn’t change the fact that Mike’s a top-notch photographer, and incidentally one of the hardest working photographers I’ve encountered. Mike tends to be the brave one when shooting in (sometimes dangerous) abandoned spots, too—climbing fences, through asbestos-filled underground tunnels, slipping into small holes in windows…then yelling from the inside how to get in.

This image is titled perfectly: we see some machinery laying on top of rubble as if resting its head; the light is dim and fades off to the left. It’s literally like a hunk of metal is resting. Industrial decay at its finest.

Urban Decay

6.) Erik van Hannen, The Master Bedroom

Erik is a Flickr’r, although thankfully not a New Yorker; he’s a compatriot of The Photocritic and from the Netherlands. This photo was taken in an abandoned house somewhere in France. I love how the blinds are still up, blankets are on the bed, a lamp is on the side table, and there’s only a minor amount of chaos. It’s as if whoever was living there decided one day, “I’m leaving” and left everything behind. You can practically feel the presence of the prior inhabitants. I wonder if there’s a trashy romance novel next to the desk lamp? ;-)

Urban Decay

7.) Scott Haefner, The Thomspons

Scott is a photographer who shoots in California and some of his work is similar to Troy Pavia’s. This photo is a great example of leading the eye: the steps take us up a rickety path to a rickety porch where there’s a light waiting for us at the front door. Great stuff, and a good use of artificial lighting.

Urban Decay

8.) SolusPharus, Last Smile

Another aptly titled image, this shows windows that are seemingly peering out at the viewer from the rubble of its decaying walls.

Urban Decay

9.) Evan Helfrich, Untitled

Evan takes great abstract Urban Decay photography. Often you understand that it’s something decaying, but you can’t tell exactly what it is. And that’s the point: to grok it aesthetically, not intellectually.

Urban Decay

10.) “ste-peg“, The last second before darkness

“ste-peg” is from Italy and has some really great industrial decay in addition to more unique photos as in the image below. Since he’s in Italy, he has access to some incredible abandoned sites that don’t even exist in places like the US: ancient churches!

Urban Decay

11.) Andy Ilachinski, Untitled

Andy’s photography from his website is almost exclusively Black and White, and almost all of it is absolutely fantastic. His Decay photos tend to be simple compositions and high contrast, while expressing a loneliness that is very hard to capture.

Urban Decay

12.) Patrick Joust, Hardware

Patrick is a Baltimore, Maryland photographer who captures the moments of Baltimore’s often depressingly decaying urban environment. His Flickr stream tends to focus less on abandoned buildings and more on the areas of decay that are still in use. His photo here is an all-too-common sight in Baltimore: a deceptively lonely area that feels abandoned but is in fact actively inhabited by people.

Urban Decay

13.) Ben Borgman, Untitled

Ben doesn’t have much information about himself in his Flickr profile, but this snap of Winnie the Pooh forgotten next to a harsh concrete stairwell struck a chord. Pooh looks innocent, lonely, and concerned—or am I anthropomorphizing?

Urban Decay

14.) sisms, House Print

This image has great contrast and composition, showing the only remains of a house that was removed from the side of a building.

Urban Decay

15.) Hours of Darkness, Windows of the Past

Hours of Darkness is a good site for information about abandonments and documentary photography. This photo rises above most of the rest artistically, however, in its great night shot of moving clouds in front of an imposing building that’s now harmless and abandoned.

Urban Decay

16.) DetroitYES, Untitled

DetroitYES might need a little help with site design, but the writing is good and there are fascinating documentary photos of important decaying historic buildings related to American industrialism. Detroit is a case study in Urban Decay: once the center of the universe for the automobile industry and American industrial might, but now bleeding population (and tax-payer money!) out all pores while the memory of its greatness rapidly fades. This image is a perfect metaphor for what’s happening to the city.

Urban Decay

17.) Eric Gustafson

Eric’s site is filled with great photography (really—check it out!), including this one of an old truck that seems to still be holding its own against the forces of decay.

Urban Decay

18.) Eric Hart, Standing Figure

This was taken in a nearly-abandoned town in the middle of Pennsylvania in the US. The town is Centralia, and that steam is coming from an enormous underground coal fire that’s been burning for decades, not the subway. This is very good treatment of the subject.

Urban Decay

19.) Pascal Pollei, The final resting place!

Pascal has a whole Flickr set of Beelitz Heilstatten, an abandoned Soviet military hospital in what used to be East Berlin. This photo is a good disorienting composition of what must have been a disorienting place to be.

Urban Decay

20.) Andrew Qzmn, “Байки из Склепа” отдыхают

Thanks to my great girlfriend and her father for the translation of the title from Russian: Nothing Compared to Tales From the Crypt. And I agree – out in rural Russia, a beautiful abandoned house like this has to have a pretty bizarre story attached to it.

Urban Decay

21.) Ride My Pony, Sanvean

HDR can easily be overdone, and this teeters dangerously on that line, but the framing is exceptional and the content is also very interesting. Apparently the last person who used the computer wasn’t happy with his boss…

Urban Decay

22.) Sleepy City, MIG

SleepyCity.net is filled with great adventures and photos. This is from an abandoned Soviet military base in Mongolia. How cool!

Urban Decay

23.) Abandoned Japanese Bowling Alley

I can’t read Japanese, so perhaps a reader can translate the site, but those aren’t cannon balls: they’re bowling balls in an abandoned bowling alley in Japan. Here I thought it was all neon lights, cell phones, and top of the line DSLRs…who knew Japan had Urban Decay?

Urban Decay

24.) Guillermo, Muro I

This is a good offset composition of what seems to be a door or shutter on a decaying building.

Urban Decay

25.) Timothy Neesam, Broadway

Last, but not least, some God Beams as they’re sometimes called. It’s magical to see this type of thing in an abandonment: it shows signs of life and light in an otherwise dreary atmosphere.

Urban Decay

A big thank you to Dave!

Dave has a photography exhibition of his own Urban Decay photography, titled Traces, in Rockville, Maryland (a Washington, DC suburb). Traces is a collection of images of institutional decay taken over the past several years along the East Coast of the US.

The exhibition is on the second floor at the Glenview Mansion Art Gallery; It started at the beginning of July and finishes on July 28th. Directions
to the Art Gallery can be found here – why not swing by and take a look if you’re in the area, or check out the exhibition online at Dave’s own website.

Finally, if you’re in a stalking mood anyway, why not check out Dave’s Flickr stream – and especially everything tagged ‘urban decay’, of course…

Got your own favourite urban decay photographs or photographers? Leave a comment with a link, I’d love to take a look!

A note on copyright

These images are all © their respective creators. They are being used in low resolution under the “criticism and [...] news reporting” portion of UK Fair Dealing law. If you like the photos above, please click on the links to see the full versions on the respective photographer’s sites. If you are the copyright owner to any of the above photos, and you prefer for your photographs not to be featured in such a manner, please send me an e-mail, and I will see to that they are removed.


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Photography History: The Digital Era

So far, we’ve covered the pre-film and the film era, so no prizes for guessing what today’s history lesson is going to be about – yup, that’s right, the digital era is upon us, and we’re taking a look at history as it’s happening all around us…

Let’s launch into the third and final installment in our 3-part series: The history of photography: The Era of Digital.

The history of digital photography is one that is as much about the technology of digital photography as it is about the photographers themselves; it is a history of advances in image quality and the violent manipulation of images; most importantly, it is a history which is still being written.

Many photographers who established themselves during the era of film (such as Annie Lebovitz) have made or are making the switch to digital photography. Others, (including Yann Arthus Bertrand, famous for his amazing aerial photography) have resisted the change and cite several reasons why the older model remains superior. However, few will question the fact that digital photography has changed the status of photography and the photograph in our 21st century society.

Rise of the Digital Camera

Although the digital camera was not available to consumers until 1990, the most important technology behind digital cameras, the CCD or charge-couple device, was invented in 1969. CCD is an image sensor which allows for the direct conversion of images into digital data without a chemical process. In the begging the technology was mostly applied to video cameras for use in television broadcasts. In 1981, Sony came out with a prototype digital camera which could take still images and store them on a floppy disk. Over the next ten years, companies like Logitech and Kodak worked on their own models.

The first digital camera which was actually available for consumer use was produced by Logitech and was called the “Dycam Model 1.” It had onboard memory which could store thirty-two images at once and shot pictures in black, white, and shades of gray only. With a resolution of only 376 x 240 it wasn’t exactly impressive by today’s standards, but it did open up an entirely new world for digital photography.

In the nearly two decades since the first digital camera was placed on the market, digital technology has developed at an astounding rate. The resolution of just over 90,000 pixels of the original logitech model has given way to resolutions of several millions, creating cameras which can rival the level of detail offered by film based models.

For more on the history of the digital camera, try the following links; Brief History of Digital Photography by Bob Brooke, History of the Digital Camera on CNET and SnapJunky.com’s History of the Digital Camera.

Changes to the Industry

With improvements in technology, digital cameras have not only become more powerful, but they have become less and less expensive as well. Cameras with resolutions of two megapixels or more can now be purchased for under $100. While this may still be more expensive than some film cameras, the money saved in film, chemicals, and other development hardware is well worth it to many photographers young and old.

As a result, many companies have been forced to scrap or greatly reduce their film camera lines and up their production of digital models. As would be expected, photographers have met this news with mixed feelings. For many, this symbolizes progress and increased accessibility for photographic equipment, a sort of populist revolution (not to mention the impact on feature film makers, many of whom are making movies with smaller budgets than ever before).

For others, the advent of digital photography means the end of an era, quite possibly an era that they loved. And for those who still believe that film photography offers a level of quality unmatched by digital cameras, feelings cannot be wholly positive. Nevertheless, the industry has followed suit with demand and continues to move toward a more and more digital oriented business model.

Changes to the Art Form

The question of quality is only one of the controversial issues surrounding the ascension of digital photography, and perhaps not even the biggest one. In fact as time goes on, those who argue that digital photography offers an image quality which is not meaningfully distinguished from that of film photography increase in numbers.

But at the same time, the art form is faced with what is perhaps an even more interesting issue. As digital photographic technology continues to increase, the potential for the manipulation of images increases as well.

Of course, artificial manipulation of images is not unique to digital photography. In fact, photographers have been reworking photographic images since at least the 1860′s (one famous example is a portrait of Abraham Lincoln in which his head has been pasted onto another politician’s body). However, the equipment required to perform this kind of manipulation was not widely available at this time. But in the last two decades, the digital camera has coupled with the personal computer to grant digital manipulation technology to the masses.

Some, photographers have used computer based programs such as photoshop as a means for creating new types of photographs based on principles of collage. Often, these remediated photographs purposefully draw attention to their “unreal” quality. However, others have used computers in order to cause photographs for magazine publication to look more appealing without making it explicitly clear that the image has been altered. As the monetary price for this technology has become less and less expensive, digital manipulation of published photographs is becoming the norm rather than the exception.

Look at this study on Photo Tampering Throughout History by H. Farid for more information on digital manipulation.

Future Greats of Digital Photography?

Digital photography is still a young art form, and ultimately, it isn’t actually any different from film photography – the techniques are the same, it’s just the technology that’s shifting.

Having said that, I think that these are some of the young photographers who are currently producing compelling photographic work, often in the digital medium…

Michael Wolf

Wolf is best known for his photographs of cities, especially those of Chicago. Many of his photos attempt to capture elements of the city which are obvious, and yet which normally escape the eye of the camera.

Michael Wolfe at the Museum of Contemporary Photography.

Deanna Dikeman

Dikeman is slightly less well known, but has a very original style of depicting clothing. It is almost never shown on the body, but instead in the wardrobe. A photography that finds itself on the other side of fashion.

Deana Dikeman at the Museum of Contemporary Photography.

Johnathan Gitelson

Gitelson is an excellent example of how collage has been absorbed by the general practices of digital photography. His art has been compared to the comic book, and his playful/serious wit confirms this.

Johnathan Gitelson at the Museum of Contemporary Photography.

Tim Long

Long follows in the tradition of early 20th century realism with his “heartbreaking” photographs of the city of Havana. His work as a whole however, shows a great sense of diversity and a large scope of vision.

Tim Long at the Museum of Contemporary Photography.

Matt Siber

Siber’s work is an excellent example of the power of digital editing to act as a critique of the image and of culture itself. His most famous photographic series “Floating Logos” acts as a study of the icons of our time, Playboy, Denny’s, etc. Floating signs at gas stations litter his photographic vision of America.

Matt Siber at the Museum of Contemporary Photography.

Additional Information on Digital Photography and its History – Digital Photography on Wikipedia, Digital Versus Film, DMOZ’s Digital Photography Links, Digital Photography FAQ from Ronald Parr, Digital Versus Film Website and finally A List of Photographer’s who’ve Chosen to Revert Back to Film (they do exist!)

Haje’s History of Photography

The History of Photography part 1 - Before Film
The History of Photography part 2 - The Firm Era
The History of Photography part 3 - The Digital Era


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Photography History: The Film Era

Right, yesterday’s post was all about how photography came about before film was invented. We had people printing on pewter and inventing the photographic negative, but we all know that the real fun began when we started losing our films down the back of sofas and ruining them when clumsily pressing the wrong button on the camera…

So without further ado, the second installment in our 3-part series: The history of photography: The Era of Film.  

In 1884, the world of photography was changed forever through the invention of film. The bulky, cumbersome photographic plates which had been the standard in photography up until this point became a thing of the past as they were replaced by the much more practical film roll technology.

George Eastman and Kodak

At age twenty-three George Eastman abandoned his career as a bank clerk and started working in a photographic lab. It was then that George imagined a new type of photographic plate which would be lighter and more portable. This would become what Eastman called the “dry plate” and what we call “film.” Once he had fully worked out this technology, Eastman invented a compact camera to compliment the film and started his own company to market this product. The company was called “Eastman Kodak” and continues to be one of the largest commercial photography companies to this day. (You know – Kodak, as in “Kodak moment.”)

Eastman’s Kodak camera was sold to consumers with 100 pictures-worth of film preloaded. For the first time, a camera had been built which was small enough to take anywhere, and which required no technical knowledge to use. Any person with $25 could buy Eastman’s camera and take pictures with the push of a button. Once the customer had taken 100 pictures, they would merely post the camera back to the Eastman Kodak Co. and within weeks they would receive back prints of their pictures and a fresh load of film. This sudden burst of accessibility completely changed the photography industry. Eastman Kodak’s slogan was “You press the button, we do the rest.”

More? Sure thing, how about George Eastman’s Grave, Kodak’s own Biography of George Eastman, The George Eastman House (A museum dedicated to Eastman) and Information on and Pictures of Antique Kodak Cameras

Film Photography Going into the 20th Century

As the world moved into the twentieth century photography was still attempting to define its role in society. As photography became more accessible, it in some ways took over the function which painting had fulfilled in the nineteenth century. Many felt, that it was a superior tool for creating realistic portraits, as well as landscape and still life studies. At the same time, advances in the technology of film resulted in increased commercialization as well as the rapid development of the world’s newest art form: cinema.

But throughout all of these changes, photography as an art never ceased to flourish, and many of the photographs which have become indelible elements of our global consciousness were created during this period. Below are just a few of the important names who helped to capture these images.

Jacob Riis

The Danish-American Riis began his career in photography at just about the time when film was becoming an industry standard. From the beginning Riis had an unflagging dedication to using his art as a means for bringing the lives of the poor of New York City into a venue of representation visible to all.

It was Riis’ great collection of photographs How the Other Half Lives (1890) which exposed the sordid reality of poverty in America to the public eye and which convinced the then president Theodore Roosevelt to shut down the inhuman state run poor houses of New York. His photographs of working class people and their lives still communicate a sense of awe and shocking immediacy today.

It’s well worth delving into Riis’ history a bit further, so check out Riis on Wikipedia, A short biography of Riis on the Harvard site, and some Photographs by Riis

Edward Curtis

By the beginning of the twentieth century, many of the cultures of the native peoples of the North American continent had begun to disappear as a result of United States expansionism. Wealthy American financier J.P. Morgan paid photographer Edward Curtis to photograph these cultures and compile his photos into a book called The North American Indian.

Although Curtis has sometimes been criticized for manipulating his photographs to represent Native Americans in a way consistent with the stereotypes of his day, it nevertheless remains that he succeeded in capturing images of many Native American leaders who would have otherwise been forgotten by history.

More on Curtis on Wikipedia, and a good essay; Edward S. Curtis in Context.

André Kertész

By the 1920′s, while many photographers continued in the tradition of the realism of Curtis and Riis (most notably: Dorothea Lange), other photographers worked to discover a more esoteric style which could answer to the new developments in Modernist painting and sculpture. Hungarian born André Kertész was just such a photographer.

Born in the final years of the nineteenth century, Kertész was completely self-educated in photography. When he moved to France in 1925, he fit in easily with the Dada movement of artists and poets. His work is conceptual, and often attempts to make visible elements of the world which are not immediately visible to the naked eye. He accomplishes this through close-ups, unusual lighting, and mirrors, among other tropes.

More on Kertész: Photographs by Kertész, André Kertész on PBS’s American Masters and More photographs by Kertész

Ansel Adams

Ansel Adams is perhaps the most well known photographer in the English Speaking world for his famous landscape and nature photographs. Images such as Monolith, Adam’s imposing portrait of the Half Dome cliff in Yosemite California have made his name internationally recognizable.

Throughout his life, which lasted well into the latter years of the twentieth century, Adams was dedicated to nature photography and to nature itself as a treasure to be protected. He saw his photographs as a way to communicate the value of natural open spaces. However, Adams always insisted that beyond any political motivation, the final purpose of any photograph should be its sheer aesthetic beauty.

More on Adams can be found at The Ansel Adams Gallery, Zpub’s Short Biography of Adams and Ansel Adams: A Documentary Film on PBS

Annie Leibovitz

Moving closer towards the digital age the role of photography again found itself destabilized. Annie Leibovitz, born in 1949 is a contemporary photographer who has repeatedly problematized the distinction between art and popular photography. She has worked in both media, but her work is powerful regardless of its “content.”

Most famously, she captured the final photograph of John Lennon of Beatles fame. What had been intended as a solo portrait of Lennon became the famous image of a nude John holding on desperately to the fully clothed Yoko. Leibovitz has continued to produce work in all subject categories which is varied in conception. From political to comic, dense to sparse, it continues to amaze.

More on Leibovitz; Leibovitz’s Portraits.

Oh, and if you’re hanging about in London, there’s a Leibovitz exhibit on at the National Portrait Gallery until mid-February. Well worth a trip.

Haje’s History of Photography

The History of Photography part 1 - Before Film
The History of Photography part 2 - The Firm Era
The History of Photography part 3 - The Digital Era


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Photography History: Before Film


A few weeks ago, I had a long and interesting discussion about the History of Photography with a friend of mine, and I discovered that while photography is incredibly close to my heart, I didn’t really know all that much about everything that has happened in the past.

Obviously, that had to change – I give you the first in a 3-part series entitled, without a shred of originality, History of Photography. This time around, we’re having a look at what happened before they went ahead and invented film… 

The Camera Obscura

The primary grounding principle of photography was already know as early as the fifth century B.C.E. It was the Chinese philosopher Mo-Ti who remarked at this time that when a small hole is opened up on one side of a darkened room, light diffuses through this hole onto the opposite wall in the form of an upside-down projection of the outside scene, a phenomenon almost identical to what happens on the inside of a modern film camera.

In the eleventh century the Islamic scientist Ibn al-Haytham elaborated this principle further by conducting experiments which made use of a lantern placed strategically in front of a similar setup in order to create this effect artificially. He was also the first to document this phenomenon in detail by creating diagrams which give a hypothetical account of the trajectory of light as it passes through the dark room hole. Al-Haytham is to this day widely respected for this important contribution. (His face is printed on the Iraqi 10,000 Dinar note.)

During the Renaissance period in Europe many other scientists including Leonardo Da Vinci invented further improvements to this device, including modifications that allowed for the use of a small box for projection instead of a large room and a lens instead of a simple hole. This allowed for a much clearer projection of the image. Using mirrors, the image could then be projected onto a piece of paper which artists would use as a tracing image. However, it was not until 17th century that the German scientist Johannes Kepler gave the device its name: the camera obscura, Latin for “Dark Room.”

Several room size camera obscuras still exist today including a very large one in San Francisco, California which, built in the shape of a modern 35mm film camera!

For more information on camera obscuras, Bright Bytes and Wikipedia have loads of interesting info

Nicéphore Niépce

Photography developed out of the principle of the camera obscura when the French inventor Nicéphore Niépce created the first permanent photograph in 1825. Now, instead of projecting the image onto a blank screen, it was projected onto a pewter plate which was coated with a light-sensitive petroleum derivative. This chemical then reacted to the light by creating a colored imprint of the projected image. However, because of the nature of the chemical, it took eight full hours for the picture to become exposed. Niépce’s first photograph using this process is also the earliest known photograph which is still in existence. It can be seen here along with further information about its creation and preservation.

Later Niépce began experimenting with a new silver-based compound which allowed for a shorter fifteen minute exposure time. This was still arguably too long for practical photographic portraiture. However, one of Niépce’s photographs from this period did accidentally become the first photograph of a human being. He had set his equipment up at the end of a street and intended to capture the landscape of the town. Most of the traffic on the street is invisible to the camera since it is moving to fast for the fifteen minute exposure to capture. However, there just happened to be a single man stopping to have his shoe shined on the corner for a period which was just long enough for his image to be imprinted on the photograph. This picture can be seen here.

Louis Daguerre

After the death of Nicéphore Niépce, his assistant Louis Daguerre continued his work and made improvements to the photographic process. Most importantly he invented what is known as the “Daguerrotype Process.” The process further reduced total exposure time and thereby made photographic portraiture a commercial reality. At the same time that Daguerre was perfecting his process a Brazilian inventor named Hercules Florence was developing an almost identical process. It was he who gave this process the name “Photographie.”

More about Daguerre? It’s fascinating stuff – check out wwar.com and Wikipedia’s entry on the Daguerrotype

William Fox Talbot

Meanwhile in England, another inventor was also working on a similar photographic process. This man was William Fox Talbot, the first photographer to employ a “negative” in his process. This would allow him to create a single negative image during exposure which would then be used to print an unlimited number of positive copies. This became the model for most photographic processes which would follow during the next 100 years and beyond. In addition to his achievements as a photographic inventor, Talbot was himself a groundbreaking photographer, with work ranging from portraiture to images of Paris and London.

Today there is an entire museum dedicated to Talbot, his inventions, and his photographs – for more, check out The Correspondence of William Fox Talbot and ‘Talbot’ vs. ‘Fox Talbot’

John Herschel and Anna Atkins

John Herschel was a mathematician and astronomer who made several improvements on and experimented with Talbot’s model. Among these improvements, was a process called “cyanotype” which produces a blue colored print. In addition, it was Herschel who supplied Talbot with the terms “negative” and “positive.” Another photographer named Anna Atkins later used Herschel’s cyanotype process to produce a series of books on plant life illustrated with blue-tinted photographs. For this work, she is known as the first female photographer.

For more on John Herschel try the following links on seds.org and wikipedia; For more on Anna Atkins and her beautiful cyanotype prints try
Getty

Frederick Scott Archer

By the 1850′s the interest in and demand for photographs was growing at an steady rate. Unfortunately, both of the dominant photographic procedures were still terribly flawed. The Daguerrotype could produce a very fine picture, but it required a still relatively long sitting time for portrait customers. On the other hand, Talbot’s process, although it was more efficient, produced an image with weak contrast and poor definition.

As a solution to the problem, Archer invented his own process named the collodion process. In an act of photography history sainthood, Archer decided not to patent his invention, but instead, to allow its use by one and all alike, without fee. Partially as a result of this failure to protect his own interests, Archer never attained financial success. When he died in 1857 he was poor and relatively unknown.

However, Archer’s developments and those of his predecessors led to the immanent invention of film which was to revolutionize the world of photography once again…

Haje’s History of Photography

The History of Photography part 1 - Before Film
The History of Photography part 2 - The Firm Era
The History of Photography part 3 - The Digital Era


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

How exposure works

To understand exposure in photographical terms, EV is probably the single most important number you will have to understand, to understand the theory behind the art of photography. This goes from your tiniest, least significant compact camera, to your cock-on-the-table style medium format camera with a digital back.

Non-technical

Let us imagine a value called TCE. This TCE (The Correct Exposure) does not exist, because you might for a variety of reasons want a different exposure than the TCE. But for the sake of argument, let’s assume TCE exists, and this is what you will want when you take a certain picture.

To get a correct exposure, you will want to have EXACTLY the right amount of light to capture your image. Not too much, and not too little.

So, what is it that might affect how much light comes to the film or imaging chip?

  • Shutter speed – Imagine a mug with a lid containing a mysterious source of light, and the room you stand in is covered in darkness. Shutter speed would be how long you open the lid.
  • Aperture – Same cup, same concept, but this time, how far you open the lid (if you open it a little – small aperture, i.e. high aperture numbers (for example f/22). If you open it all the way – large aperture – i.e. low aperture numbers (for example f/2.8)
  • These are the two basic ones. The last factor that comes into play is your film speed, or the light sensitivity of your surroundings while holding the cup if you will.

That’s all there is to it – these three factors combined allow you to manipulate the light in all kinds of ways (big depth of field through small apertures, freezing motion through fast shutter times, etc).

So, to get TCE, you will want to combine these three factors into JUST the correct way. Now, if you replace TCE with TCEV (The Correct Exposure Value), you understand what I have been on about.

EV is a number describing an exposure – any exposure – regardless of its “correctness”.

Technical

The definition of EV=0 is an exposure of 1 second at f/1 using ISO 100 film, or any equivalent thereof (2 seconds f/1.4, 4 seconds f/2.0 etc)

The technical definition of EV is 2EV = LS/C.

EV = the exposure value – explained above
L = field (or zone) luminance –
C = Exposure Constant – This is a constant that depends on what unit you are using to express the luminance (L)If you use candelas/ft2, it is 1.3. If you are using candelas/m2*, it is 12.5*. If you use apostilb, it is 3,98.
S = film speed following the ISO standard

*) some of you might know cd/m2 as lux or lumens/m2,

This also means that 2ev = A2/T

A = the f-stop number of the aperture
T = shutter time in seconds

Combining these two; EV = log2(A2/T) = log2(LS/C) – which is the only formula you are likely to need, if you want to understand the basics of mathematics behind photography.

So what is the EV number used for?

Ah. Well, the EV number is used internally in cameras – an EV number of 10, for example, would refer to all the combinations of shutter times and apertures that would give a given exposure using ISO 100 film. This is useful, because a camera only has to add one thing to this equation; A light measurement. A camera with a lookup table or an algorithm to calculate the correct EV is all set for using all the different combinations that are able to give you the exposure you want.

But why would I care, if the camera handles everything?

Because the camera doesn’t always get things right. You may also want to use alternative exposures for artistic reasons.

Most cameras have an EV compensation wheel/dial, allowing you to choose how much you want to over/underexpose an image. This is usually measured in +/- 2EV, 1/3 steps. This means that you can over- or underexpose an image by two whole EV steps (which, incidentally, would mean the same as two full f-stops either way), in steps of 1/3 EV.

I hope that made things a little clearer – if not, leave a comment, and I’ll see what I can do!


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Rediscovering black and white

kevin-bost-03b.jpg

In our newest instalment of the photo critique series, I’m taking a look at a series of black and white photographs taken by Kevin Bost. In the process, I’ll be exploring why Black and White photography still has a valid place in today’s colourful society… 

Black and white photography...

View Results

 

Black and white photography is very much the cradle of photography: Before colour, there was black and white. Before that, there was paint brushes and paint. Many photographers saw the introduction of colour photography as the death of black and white, but they were wrong: In fact, even today, a lot of photographers work largely — even exclusively — in monochrome. Why?

To me, black and white has an amazing quality to it — Seeing something in monochrome allows you to give it a detachment from reality.

Seen at its very simplest, any photograph has four elements: shape, texture, lighting, and colour. Think about a tennis ball: The basic shape is round. The texture is fuzzy and hairy. The colour will often be yellow, and lighting will determine how you perceive it all. The interesting thing is that of all of these qualities, you can’t strip many of them away: You can ignore the shape by getting in close enough to focus on the texture (using macro to capture the small hairs on the tennis ball, for example). You can ignore the texture by getting far enough away that the texture doesn’t matter, or by adding a motion blur (a spinning tennis-ball photographed with a long enough shutter time will have no texture). Without lighting, you wouldn’t be able to see the ball at all.

Colour falls in a completely different category: By stripping it out of your photography, the other qualities of a photograph — especially textures, which often are drowned out by colours — become more apparent. Stripping away colour, then, abstracts yet familiarises a photograph.

kevin-bost-01.jpg

Going to Kevin’s first photograph is a phenomenal way of illustrating how textures suddenly become vastly more important. The reason why this photo appeals to me is the way the asphalt on the road springs out at you. The lovely contrast in the top-right of the image, combined with the relatively lower contrast in the rest of the photo adds a touch of drama.

To me, this appears to be a photograph commenting on aspects of mental health: The deep black of the trees contrasting against the blown-out highlights on the horizon. The way the photographer takes up a significant part of the photo without really being visible. I don’t know the photographer, and I don’t know how accurate my interpretation might be.

While the general principe of the photo is exciting to me (I loved the angled composition), it does have some serious flaws. I wouldn’t have minded the vastly blown-out horizon so much — it’s one of the charms about black and white photography, that strong contrast and even going outside the dynamic range of your film / imaging sensor / printing paper can look damn hot — but the building and the plants along the road on the left side are a bit peculiarly exposed. The old adage of exposing for the highlights and developing for the shadows (as discussed in an earlier photo critique) would have come in handy here, as it would have allowed you more data to work with, so you can either keep the telegraph poles on the horizon, or so you can edit them out successfully in Photoshop.

If I personally had taken this photo, I would have gone back with a tripod and had a shot at turning it into a High Dynamic Range photograph, just to have some more data to work with to help it along.

kevin-bost-02.jpg

Kevin’s second photo had me a little bit baffled. Mostly, I just can’t figure out what’s going on here. Sure, it’s some guy driving a car in the rain, but what intrigues me is the hand. The thing around the wrist — is that a hospital tag? What is the liquid on the driver’s hand? That looks a lit like it could be blood. Is it a doctor, on their way to an emergency? Is the heart-shaped item on the dashboard a radiogram? Is the guy about to be a father?

It is a really simple photo, which interestingly enough draws its focus, yet again, from its wild and varied contrast. The sky is completely blown out. The dashboard is pure darkness. And the hand is the only part of the photo that stands out as being ‘correctly’ exposed. A very fascinating photo that raises a ton of questions.

 

The real question, though: If I hadn’t done a critique of this photo, would I even have looked at it a second time? Probably not: it’s a guy in a car. I would never have noticed the heart, the armband or the blood(?) on his hand. Personally, I think this would have been a better photo if the background had been a lot calmer. A long, open motorway, perhaps, or a forest, or even a hospital in the background… Anything to stop you from looking out of the wind shield, wondering what you’re supposed to be looking at.

kevin-bost-03.jpg

Of all the photos Kevin sent to me, this is by far my favourite, and it also rather clearly embodies what I feel black and white photography is about. The photo comes across as an impressionistic piece, in that his toes are in a blur (is it because he’s in a river, and the refractions work as a motion blur? Maybe…). The torn trousers and the fluid motion of the water bring holiday-type-thoughts to my mind. While this photo might have a lot less of a message than, say, the previous photograph, it is a much more appealing photo to me, visually. This photograph wouldn’t be out of place in a trendy restaurant or an edgy art gallery: It’s obviously not a snapshot of someone’s feet: Deliberation, planning, and exquisite exposure comes together to create a powerful visual image.

In addition, it’s worth noting that this photo doesn’t look as if colour would have added much to it: It’s all about the motion and texture.

On a personal level, I would probably have treated the photograph to a slight re-crop. It’s a personal preference thing, which doesn’t necessarily add much to the photo the way the photographer intended, but I’m very much a ‘get into the action’ kind of guy: In artistic photos, I find you often don’t need the context that is added to a photo. As such, with a bit of re-cropping, I landed at this:

kevin-bost-03b.jpg

So, why should people still bother with black and white in the digital age? Well, in many ways, black and white photography has become easier than ever. By using the digital darkroom (and especially by using the channel mixer to turn a colour photo into monochrome), you get a lot more influence and control over how your photograph is rendered.

That, and what is there not to love about monochromatic art? If it was good enough for Ansel Adams, it’s good enough for me…


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Image aspect ratios

tobacco.jpg

In a recent photo critique, I went off on one about the aspect ratios I prefer, when I look at photos. But have you ever thought about why you would prefer a particular image ratio? Is there a rule about what size photos should be, and if so – who decides the rules?

I’m just sharing my own thoughts here, but I’d love to hear your opinions on the matter as well!

sleepy.jpgThere are a lot of ideas around regarding what size things should be. ISO 7810, for example, specifies the size and shape of a credit card, the aspect ratio of which many people find is a comfortable, conceivably because its official size (85.60 × 53.98 mm) is pretty close to the aspect ratio of a golden rectangle (related, of course, to the golden ratio. See also the silver ratio, which is used, among other things, to determine the shape of an A4 sheet of paper).

So why do most photographers operate with 3:2, 4:3 or 1:1? Well, truth be told, it’s a historical thing: The modern 135 film (also known as 35mm – referring to the width of the film – or 36mm – referring to the width of a negative frame – film) was 36mm by 24mm in size. The past 80 years or so, we have become so accustomed to the 36×24 (that is to say, 3:2 aspect ratio) photos, that it just looks… right.

flower.jpg4:3 is the aspect ratio of a normal television, which is of course another size we have become used to over time, and it is the aspect ratio used by most computer monitors. Some digital camera manufacturers took to – including Canon: my Digital Ixus / Elph takes photos in the 4:3 aspect ratio. Some cameras – including the Canon Powershot G7 – even support both image ratios, selectable in the menu system. If you are curious which cameras use which aspect ratio, check out Digital Photo Review. Since the dawn of time (well, since Phil Askey has had the the stats on his site), they’ve kept track of which camera uses which.

The last aspect ratio that is popular is 16:9, because it is used in cinemas as ‘wide screen’, but there are dozens of others in use, too.

So, err, do you use a calculator when you crop your photos?

Oh, not at all! The marquee tool in Photoshop has a powerful function which is called ‘fixed aspect ratio’. As you probably know, if you use the marquee tool and hold the shift key, the selected area is forced to be a perfect square. You can also select your own aspect ratio, however, in the tool menu that shows up when you select the marquee tool:

aspect-ratio.jpg

Here, you can type in whatever aspect ratio you prefer, and the select tool will lock on to it. If you want to switch between 3:2 and 2:3 (for example, if you want to crop portrait instead of landscape photos), you can just click the button with the two little arrows: It swaps the numbers over for you.

Nifty, yes?

tobacco.jpgWhat makes you choose an aspect ratio over another?

So, why do I refuse to crop images to anything other than either 3:2? It’s an odd one, I’m fully aware of that, but to me, there’s something almost holy about 3:2. I like my photos to be photo-shaped, and to me, the 3:2 shape just looks the most right. I find it peaceful to look at, and there is something exciting about working to the arbitrary and dated restraint of 3:2.

At the same time, I did a photo shoot about 4 years ago which opened my eyes to shooting square photos. I had a few photographs that were very successful, but that just didn’t quite want to work out as photos. In the end, I spotted that perhaps it would work if it was square, and this was the result:

IMG_4982.jpg

Ultimately, I can’t tell why I decided to stick to those two formats. Perhaps it looks tidier. Perhaps it saves time if and when I decide to have the photos printed. Or perhaps I’m just an old-fashioned has-been, who refuses to let the fact that you can crop your image to whatever the hell you want to break on through.

So… What about you? Do you have hang-ups about aspect ratios of your images? Leave a comment!

(can you spot what all the aspect ratios in this post were? The girl is 1:1, the glasses and sleepy person is 3:2, the flower is 4:3, and the brown stuff, which actually is tobacco from a cigarette, magnified 6x, is 16:9)


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Camera theory

eye.jpg

eye.jpgI just found the best web page ever. I know, it’s a bit of a tall claim, but I think it’s probably the truth.

What if there was a web-site out there that explained in great detail how cameras work, history of photography, and offer up a ton of cheap mods you can do to a camera to broaden its use to astrophotography, micro photography, and lots of other nifty stuff? Yeah, I thought that’d catch your attention! 

 

The page in question is On Camera Creation, Standards, and Custom-made Cameras. It’s an amazing article on Digit-Life.com, and covers a tremendous number of big topics, including how cameras are built, how they work, how lenses attach to your camera, how focussing works, how shutters, aperture and… and…

Okay, so the article is a bit on the rambly side, but it’s an excellent read. What are you still reading this for? Go read the article!


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.

Rule of Thirds explained

Picture-5.jpg

Picture-5.jpgIt is an age-old adage, but the Rule of Thirds is present in a surprising amount of photographs.

The rule states that an image can be divided into nine equal parts by two equally-spaced horizontal lines and two equally-spaced vertical lines. The four points formed by the intersections of these lines can be used to align features in the photograph. Proponents of this technique claim that aligning a photograph with these points creates more tension, energy and interest in the photo than simply centering the feature would.  

 

There are quite a few sites out there that talk about the rule of thirds, and there is a lot of discussion going on as to wether it’s a load of poo-poo, or if there is some sense to it. We’d be the last people to say that you should be using the rule of thirds, but one thing it certainly does is that you become more aware of your framing and what’s actually going on in your frame.

Read more about the rule of thirds on Silverlight, Wikipedia and Everything2.

To see some examples of the Rule of Thirds in action, check out the example galleries on Pixalo, PhotoInf, Digital Photography 101 and Better Photo!

Now go out there and give it a try!


Do you enjoy a smattering of random photography links? Well, squire, I welcome thee to join me on Twitter -

© Kamps Consulting Ltd. This article is licenced for use on Pixiq only. Please do not reproduce wholly or in part without a license. More info.