<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why sharpen your images?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 8 Fotolinks van deze week - Faraway Places</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-314639</link>
		<dc:creator>8 Fotolinks van deze week - Faraway Places</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-314639</guid>
		<description>[...] Why sharpen your images? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why sharpen your images? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-314432</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-314432</guid>
		<description>You have to sharpen your pictures because most manufacturers use antialiasing filters in their camera. Only few don&#039;t, for example Leica. Thus, their pictures are noticeably sharper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to sharpen your pictures because most manufacturers use antialiasing filters in their camera. Only few don&#8217;t, for example Leica. Thus, their pictures are noticeably sharper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paw</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-305049</link>
		<dc:creator>Paw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-305049</guid>
		<description>Nice article - Well written and very informative.

Thanks man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article &#8211; Well written and very informative.</p>
<p>Thanks man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8 steps to sharper photos :: Photocritic photography blog</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-296171</link>
		<dc:creator>8 steps to sharper photos :: Photocritic photography blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-296171</guid>
		<description>[...] a lengthy explanation for why you should sharpen your photos, and a separate one which treats the all-important question of how you sharpen photographs in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lengthy explanation for why you should sharpen your photos, and a separate one which treats the all-important question of how you sharpen photographs in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-242060</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-242060</guid>
		<description>Camera manufacturers put a filter over the sensor of digital cameras to control unwanted optical surprises. Forgive me if I can&#039;t think of what the filter is called and what it controls.

A negative side effect of this filter is images that come out of the camera are a little soft. Therefore they need to be sharpened a bit.

A good tip for sharpening is, if you have adobe photoshop cs3, to turn the layer to be sharpened into a smart layer. That way you can use you sharpening method of choice and adjust the sharpening amount when you need to for output to a different resolution or device. This is non destructive and similar to an adjustment layer.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camera manufacturers put a filter over the sensor of digital cameras to control unwanted optical surprises. Forgive me if I can&#8217;t think of what the filter is called and what it controls.</p>
<p>A negative side effect of this filter is images that come out of the camera are a little soft. Therefore they need to be sharpened a bit.</p>
<p>A good tip for sharpening is, if you have adobe photoshop cs3, to turn the layer to be sharpened into a smart layer. That way you can use you sharpening method of choice and adjust the sharpening amount when you need to for output to a different resolution or device. This is non destructive and similar to an adjustment layer.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apurva</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-241629</link>
		<dc:creator>Apurva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-241629</guid>
		<description>Great article. Informative and  very useful. Thanks!
Apurva</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Informative and  very useful. Thanks!<br />
Apurva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-241586</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-241586</guid>
		<description>Yeah same here. Thanks for the article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah same here. Thanks for the article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/why-sharpen-photos/#comment-241549</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/?p=926#comment-241549</guid>
		<description>Hmm, good points, I hadn&#039;t thought about it that way before about my DSLR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, good points, I hadn&#8217;t thought about it that way before about my DSLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
