In photography, rules aren’t laws.

Oh will you look at that. How very Web 2.0!

The internet is absolutely full of guides about things you should and shouldn’t do to take ‘good photos’. Don’t over-expose. Remember the rule of thirds. Don’t cut people’s heads off. Watch your background. Use a shallow DOF in portraits to throw the backgrounds out of focus. 3-point lighting for portraiture, etc.

A lot of us just take all these rules for given, as if they are hard-and-fast rules that you have to stick to, because if you don’t, you’ll fail as a photographer. Break these rules, and you won’t take a good photo in your life. Your cat will die, your children will hate you, and your significant other will divorce you.

Truth, as you might expect, is slightly different. Don’t get me wrong, most of the time the ‘rules’ (which in any case should be seen as mere guidelines) make a lot of sense. Of course it looks silly if you cut people’s heads off. Of course your photos won’t look conventional if they are harshly over- or under-exposed.

Rules aren’t laws. You can break them unpunished

Grossly over-exposing a photo doesn't have to mean it won't look good. (click for bigger on Flickr)

Read the sentence above. That’s all I really wanted to say with this article. So if you’re in a rush, or you think I use too many words to say something simple, then read that sentence a few times, and go check out XKCD for a while.

What I’m trying to say is that while the guidelines are there to help you, there’s no point in following any rules or guidelines unless you fully understand (or grok, if you’re geeky and/or well-read enough to be familiar with that concept) why.

The best reason to understand why a rule is there, is to break it. Some times, you might find that your photos actually come out more interesting – better, even, perhaps – when you break the rules. Other times, you’ll try to take the same photo twice; once whilst following the rule, and once whilst breaking it, and you’ll realise why it’s a good idea.

Just remember: Never follow a rule just because you’ve read somewhere that it’s the ‘right’ thing to do. Follow it because you understand it, and because you know what happens when you don’t.

Break these rules

Contrary to popular belief, your foreground doesn't have to be in focus (clicky for bigger)

A couple of examples

DO cut their heads off at the top if it makes for more interesting and intimate photos (click for bigger on Flickr)

The Carlsberg Express: Of course your horizon doesn't have to be straight, if a non-straight horizon gives you better results! (click for bigger on Flickr)

Sometimes, getting in closer makes a photo more intimate. Don't be afraid to crop into people's faces.

The horizontals aren't horizontal. The verticals aren't vertical. The background is a mess. How could this photo ever be any good? But it is... (click for bigger on Flickr)

White balance? Hah? I spit on your white balance. (click for bigger)

Some times, the background adds to a photo - don't throw it out of focus on principle just because you have a nice, fast lens.

Take over the world by sharing this post with your worst enemies
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • NewsVine
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • RSS
This post, "In photography, rules aren’t laws.", is part of these categories: All articles, Become a better photographer, Featured Articles, was posted by Haje Jan Kamps and saw the light of day on the 11th of February 2010. I hope you liked it.

Insights, suggestions and comments

By Jacob on February 11th, 2010 (permalink)

I think in about a year’s time there will be as many photography articles on the net telling people not to follow the rules as there are articles about the rules! Only joking (am I not funny?). I quite liked seeing your take on this matter.

And thanks for the reminder, I am now up to date with all of my XKCD reading.

By CJ on February 11th, 2010 (permalink)

Nice article and glad someone did one on this. I have heard from a few “professional” photographers in the past that I have “broken” some of the rules and until I learn to not do that I will never have good work. I agree they are guidelines that are suggested to be followed but like any art sometimes the best stuff happens outside the guidelines.

By Greg Taylor on February 11th, 2010 (permalink)

Rules and art mix like oil and water. I consider the rules as merely suggestions. Not every suggestion is applicable for every situation. I always tell people: Know your equipment, know your surroundings and trust your instincts.

By Greg on February 11th, 2010 (permalink)

I love this post! I keep breaking the rules and I guess that’s what people like about my pictures. Photography rules are great guidelines but you definetly need to think outside de box.

By Bryan on February 11th, 2010 (permalink)

Agreed, Agreed, Agreed. The internet seems to have come to a consensus on most of the basic photo rules so that anything that deviates from them draws unwanted criticism, sometimes masked as “suggestions.”

Rules shouldn’t be followed or broken without reason. I think a photograph is made stronger simply by the photographer making decisions deliberately. To me, that’s the biggest difference between a snapshooter and a photographer.

Also, for some related entertaining reading based on photo rules being taken to far, check these out:

http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/2006/06/great-photographers-on-internet.html

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2009/11/great-photographers-on-the-internet-part-ii.html

By Cory O'Brien on February 12th, 2010 (permalink)

I’m constantly fighting the urge to line up everything in my photos so that it’s perfectly horizontal/vertical, because I find that when I ignore that rule is often when I take my best shots.

If we all followed every photography rule every time, we’d all take the same shots, which wouldn’t be very much fun at all, so thanks for reminding us to ignore the rules from time to time and just go shoot!

By Tom Haywood on February 15th, 2010 (permalink)

A good photo is a good photo, it matters not how it was made :)

By Fiona - Wedding Photographer Surrey on February 17th, 2010 (permalink)

Nice article, thanks. Knowledge of basic rules is very important but knowing how to sometimes break the rules leads to more creative photography.

By Tom Reaume on February 19th, 2010 (permalink)

Hi Haje,

Still photography is like sex without foreplay. Your site is interesting but it only deals with still photography and ho hum reflected light. So trivial. Find me at flickr under my name. There are 13 non still photos made with a camera and without Photoshop. Tom Reaume

By cris on February 24th, 2010 (permalink)

“Break these rules, and you won’t take a good photo in your life. Your cat will die, your children will hate you, and your significant other will divorce you.”

LOL

By gordon on March 1st, 2010 (permalink)

I’ve recently noticed more than ever the disconnect between photography that is popular online and the photography which is considered fine art. Most of what I seen in fine art photo magazines or in galleries wouldn’t follow most photo rules and definitely wouldn’t be popular on flickr. Thanks for the nice article.

By Vidit Kothari on March 1st, 2010 (permalink)

It’s a very nice post for us(amateurs)

THANK YOU so much !!!

:)

By Sangeeth Priyanath on March 20th, 2010 (permalink)

A great article.Its extremely helpful to me and thanks for sharing.

By Pavel on May 23rd, 2010 (permalink)

This is a variation of discussion “what is art”. I believe that there are two distinct areas in photography: technical (for lack of better term) which is following rules – composition, lighting, color schemes and so on. The end result a capture, perfect in technical sense image – sharp, contrast, correct colors and so on. Art photography is about a vision, a message….

By Sarah on June 4th, 2010 (permalink)

I have to say the only reason I read your blog was because I understand ‘grok’ so I had to see what you said :)
breaking the rules is always my favorite part of making an image but as I’m getting ready to teach beginners I know the first thing I’m going to do is teach them the rules before they break them themselves.

By Tim on August 30th, 2010 (permalink)

I have to agree 100% on breaking the rules……..and I love your sense of humor!

 

Share your wisdom



Go on, click the button

Do your eyes have the same white balance?
View Results

Photocritic goes ‘Tweet’.

Go on. Join the fun, follow @Photocritic on Twitter!

Get notified!

If you want to get a notification whenever Photocritic makes a new post, fill in the form below!

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox

I love this on Flickr

On the Book of Face

Photocritic on Facebook

My books

Macro Photography Photo Workshop

Macro Photography Photo Workshop by Haje Jan Kamps My day job, if it can be called that, is being a writer. I've got one book out there so far and it's awesome, so go ahead and buy a copy! It's available from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and most decent-sized bookshops, too!

To find out more, check out this post! If you want to know more about the 'being a writer' thing, check this site out.

Put another dime in the jukebox

Put another dime in the jukebox In front of you, five hyperactive men with guitars, drums, and microphones. Behind you, five thousand fans. In your hands, a camera... You're going to need more than just a little bit of good luck to pull this one off. That's where this book comes in.

With nearly a hundred fantastic gig photos, and a ton of info about how to get involved in taking photos like this yourself, you can't go wrong. Buy this book. Grab your camera. Good luck.

Street Photography: London

Street Photography: London Take a Canon EOS 450D. Attach a Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens. Hit the streets of London. See what happens.

Sounds simple - but the results are anything but. Moving, intense, and personal, Street Photography: London is a great collection of the people of London, their passions, and their dreams. Look for yourself!


About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje