<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photocritic goes retro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/retro-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Larter</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7870</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Larter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7870</guid>
		<description>I like the last one you had :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the last one you had :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolever</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7712</link>
		<dc:creator>wolever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7712</guid>
		<description>Daniel: There are downsides having a 12" laptop... Fortunately, the upsides far outweigh them (and external LCDs aren't too shabby either)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel: There are downsides having a 12&#8243; laptop&#8230; Fortunately, the upsides far outweigh them (and external LCDs aren&#8217;t too shabby either)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camera Man</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7644</link>
		<dc:creator>Camera Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7644</guid>
		<description>Alot better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alot better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7643</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7643</guid>
		<description>Well, I'm glad you like it.
I had fun doing it. 

-m

(Oh, and Alex: You're right. I'll send Haje an update that makes the hover-state a bit more legible.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m glad you like it.<br />
I had fun doing it. </p>
<p>-m</p>
<p>(Oh, and Alex: You&#8217;re right. I&#8217;ll send Haje an update that makes the hover-state a bit more legible.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7629</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7629</guid>
		<description>1024 in 2006??? i feel for you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1024 in 2006??? i feel for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7628</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7628</guid>
		<description>I love it! Nice palette &#38; a very good stylistic departure from the standard blog feel. My only gripe would be that when you hover over the navigation links (right-hand side) it makes the text a bit illegible.

Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it! Nice palette &amp; a very good stylistic departure from the standard blog feel. My only gripe would be that when you hover over the navigation links (right-hand side) it makes the text a bit illegible.</p>
<p>Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolever</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7612</link>
		<dc:creator>wolever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7612</guid>
		<description>Defiantly like the new colors and design.  My one beef, though, is it expects me to be browsing at 1024x768, so I need to scroll over to see things on the right side (my browser only takes up 75% of my precious 1024 pixels).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defiantly like the new colors and design.  My one beef, though, is it expects me to be browsing at 1024&#215;768, so I need to scroll over to see things on the right side (my browser only takes up 75% of my precious 1024 pixels).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7602</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 03:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7602</guid>
		<description>much cleaner!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much cleaner!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theRIAA</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7597</link>
		<dc:creator>theRIAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7597</guid>
		<description>i love the new design, its better than the last to, but i liked the thumbnails... put them back pls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love the new design, its better than the last to, but i liked the thumbnails&#8230; put them back pls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sansara</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7589</link>
		<dc:creator>Sansara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7589</guid>
		<description>Hey, this is a completely different thing. Not the sort of styling that I'd use for a photography site but what the heck, this is your weblog and the desing looks just cute :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this is a completely different thing. Not the sort of styling that I&#8217;d use for a photography site but what the heck, this is your weblog and the desing looks just cute :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7581</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7581</guid>
		<description>I like the center portion(the green, and the header), however I dont think the sides (the grayish columns) go so well with the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the center portion(the green, and the header), however I dont think the sides (the grayish columns) go so well with the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MZ</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/retro-design/#comment-7576</link>
		<dc:creator>MZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 22:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/retro-design/#comment-7576</guid>
		<description>I like the new design, it's easy to read. Retro is in :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new design, it&#8217;s easy to read. Retro is in :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
