Photocritic did expect the Spanish inquisition.

Red eyes and how to avoid them

The Red Eye phenomenon is something that occurs when you take a picture of someone. If you have a compact camera and you’ve taken a few rolls of pictures, chances are that you have stumbled across the phenomenon, during which the eyes of your subject end up glowing an eerie red glow.

Why does it happen, and how can you avoid it? Read on to find out!

Why does this happen?

If an eye had absorbed all light, then this wouldn’t happen. In fact, if an eye had been theoretically flawless, the red eye effect would not have existed at all. What happens when you see the red eyes on pictures, is that the flash is reflected in someone’s eye. The reflection is red because of all the blood vessels inside the eye.

A bit more technical, please…

Red eye is caused by light from your flash-gun reflected back to your camera lens

Red eye is caused by light from your flash-gun reflected back to your camera lens

When light shines straight into an eye, the reflection is in the shape of a cone. This can be illustrated by holding a piece of cardboard with a hole in it up in front of a mirror. Shine a flashlight into the hole, and see if you can see a reflection – see the illustration to the right

When you take pictures, in particular if you take pictures with a compact camera, the flash (source of light) and the lens (the observer) are fairly close to each other. This is our equivalent of holding the flashlight right next to your head – you will clearly see the flashlight coming back at you.

So… How do we avoid red eyes?

Removing the red eye effect can only be done by posing a change somehow, so the light from the flash doesn’t bounce back into the lens.

If we go back to our flashlight-and-cardboard-example, there are several obvious ways we can avoid the reflection:

Turn off the flashlight. This is the point most people forget about. Obviously, if you can do without a flash, either by increasing the light in the room, by switching to a film that has a faster ISO value*, or using a faster lens**

Diffuse the flashlight. If you hold a piece of (white) cloth in front of the flashlight, you will notice that the intensity of the flashlight is only a little decreased. It does, however, seem less piercing to your eyes. This is not a coincidence – if you hold a piece of thin white cloth in front of your flash, you can often drastically decrease the problem with red eyes, because the light gets diffused and “bounces” around in the room before it hits your subject

Moving the flash further away from the lens means that the reflection doesn't hit your lens, and so doesn't appear red.

Moving the flash further away from the lens means that the reflection doesn't hit your lens, and so doesn't appear red.

Move the flashlight further away from your lens This is a bit harder with compact cameras, but if you have an SLR, you should definitely get an external flash that goes in the hot shoe of your camera. For one thing, these flashes are a lot more sophisticated than the internal ones, but they are also are significantly further away from the lens.

Make the hole smaller. Put away your piece of cardboard, and take one that’s got a smaller hole in it. Try the same trick with the flashlight. As you will see, you will get a reflection in much less of the cases.

Making peoples irises smaller isn’t that hard:

You could also try to make someone's irises smaller - this would reduce the angle the light can travel, which has the same outcome as moving the flash further away from the camera.

You could also try to make someone's irises smaller - this would reduce the angle the light can travel, which has the same outcome as moving the flash further away from the camera.

You could try to turn on the anti-red-eye function that probably exists on your camera. This function usually sends off a few short flashes, or it will shine some other sharp light into your “victim’s” eyes. This makes their irises smaller, and the problem diminishes.

Turn on more lights. This has the same effect as above, but it also has some other advantages: One, you get more even light, two, depending how sophisticated your camera is, it might fire a less strong flash, giving a more natural light. Three: you might get away without using a flash altogether.

Make sure your subjects aren’t drunk. Have you ever noticed that if you take a roll of film at a party, how there seem to be more and more occurrences of the red eyes? Not a coincidence. People who start to become intoxicated have slower reactions – this applies to eyes as well. The eyes just won’t contract, leaving you with red-eyed pictures.

Footnotes:

*) ISO value: “Normal” film is 100 or 200 ISO. If you go to a store and buy some 800 film (or, if you’re all high-tech, set your digital camera to a higher ISO rating), the film will be more sensitive to light, and you will in many situations get away with not having to use a flash

**) Switching to a faster lens on a compact camera is obviously not possible. What few people realise, however, is that many of the entry-level zoom compact cameras have lenses that gather light much better when it is fully zoomed out. In low light, you should therefore consider zooming out and go closer instead of using the zoom to frame your pictures. On an SLR camera, look for a lens with a larger aperture.

Money made from this advert will be invested in prime lenses.
This post, "Red eyes and how to avoid them", is part of these categories: All articles, Become a better photographer, Featured Articles, Most Popular, was posted by Haje Jan Kamps and saw the light of day on the 2nd of December 2006. I hope you liked it.

Insights, suggestions and comments

By theRIAA on December 2nd, 2006 (permalink)

very useful information. never new it was red because of blood vessels.

By Tullaman on January 7th, 2008 (permalink)

You can also move the camera closer to the subject and use a wider setting on your zoom. Similar to the other examples this has the effect making the angle from flash to eye to lens larger. And contrary-wise you will notice that red-eye is more of a problem when zoom is used.

By Anna on June 27th, 2008 (permalink)

Good text for photographers, but according to wikipedia, the red color is NOT due to blood vessels:

“The fact that the reflected light is red often is attributed to the ample blood supply of the retina and/or chorium, but this is incorrect. The red-eye effect is due to the color of the fundus, which is due to melanin, a pigment, principally located in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).”

 

Share your wisdom



Go on, click the button

So, the 550D and the 50D cost practically the same, and have different advantages. Which one would you buy?
View Results

Get notified!

If you want to get a notification whenever Photocritic makes a new post, fill in the form below!

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox

I love this on Flickr

On the Book of Face

Photocritic on Facebook

It goes 'tweet'

  • • The Leica M8 is perfect for street photography. It just needs one tiny modification: http://yfrog.com/jva7nj (link)
  • • A fresh take on nude photography: http://ow.ly/1kYCU (NSFW, obviously) (link)
  • • This is why #TopGear is great: Destroying a Toyota pick-up truck (3 parts): http://is.gd/aHcza / http://is.gd/aHczw / http://is.gd/aHcAa (link)
  • • Not entirely surprisingly, haven't yet heard from @easyJetCare after my letter of complaint sent two weeks ago: http://is.gd/aGQmD #EasyJet (link)
  • • @JoyOfThisMoment appears to be copying and reposting many of my tweets. How... Creepy. #reportedforspam (link)
  • • Thinking outside the box with a photograph that'll make you smile: http://ow.ly/1k9Zr (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My books

Macro Photography Photo Workshop

Macro Photography Photo Workshop by Haje Jan Kamps My day job, if it can be called that, is being a writer. I've got one book out there so far and it's awesome, so go ahead and buy a copy! It's available from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and most decent-sized bookshops, too!

To find out more, check out this post! If you want to know more about the 'being a writer' thing, check this site out.

Put another dime in the jukebox

Put another dime in the jukebox In front of you, five hyperactive men with guitars, drums, and microphones. Behind you, five thousand fans. In your hands, a camera... You're going to need more than just a little bit of good luck to pull this one off. That's where this book comes in.

With nearly a hundred fantastic gig photos, and a ton of info about how to get involved in taking photos like this yourself, you can't go wrong. Buy this book. Grab your camera. Good luck.

Street Photography: London

Street Photography: London Take a Canon EOS 450D. Attach a Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens. Hit the streets of London. See what happens.

Sounds simple - but the results are anything but. Moving, intense, and personal, Street Photography: London is a great collection of the people of London, their passions, and their dreams. Look for yourself!


About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje