Red eyes and how to avoid them

Posted by Haje Jan Kamps

redeye.jpgThe Red Eye phenomenon is something that occurs when you take a picture of someone. If you have a compact camera and you’ve taken a few rolls of pictures, chances are that you have stumbled across the phenomenon, during which the eyes of your subject end up glowing an eerie red glow.

Why does it happen, and how can you avoid it? Read on to find out!

$ earned from this advert will be invested in beer

Why does this happen?

If an eye had absorbed all light, then this wouldn’t happen. In fact, if an eye had been theoretically flawless, the red eye effect would not have existed at all. What happens when you see the red eyes on pictures, is that the flash is reflected in someone’s eye. The reflection is red because of all the blood vessels inside the eye.

A bit more technical, please. Why does this happen?

redeye-01.jpgWhen light shines straight into an eye, the reflection is in the shape of a cone. This can be illustrated by holding a piece of cardboard with a hole in it up in front of a mirror. Shine a flashlight into the hole, and see if you can see a reflection - see the illustration to the right

When you take pictures, in particular if you take pictures with a compact camera, the flash (source of light) and the lens (the observer) are fairly close to each other. This is our equivalent of holding the flashlight right next to your head - you will clearly see the flashlight coming back at you.

So… How do we avoid red eyes?

Removing the red eye effect can only be done by posing a change somehow, so the light from the flash doesn’t bounce back into the lens.

If we go back to our flashlight-and-cardboard-example, there are several obvious ways we can avoid the reflection:

Turn off the flashlight. This is the point most people forget about. Obviously, if you can do without a flash, either by increasing the light in the room, by switching to a film that has a faster ISO value*, or using a faster lens**

Diffuse the flashlight. If you hold a piece of (white) cloth in front of the flashlight, you will notice that the intensity of the flashlight is only a little decreased. It does, however, seem less piercing to your eyes. This is not a coincidence - if you hold a piece of thin white cloth in front of your flash, you can often drastically decrease the problem with red eyes, because the light gets diffused and “bounces” around in the room before it hits your subject

redeye-02.jpgMove the flashlight further away from your lens This is a bit harder with compact cameras, but if you have an SLR, you should definitely get an external flash that goes in the hot shoe of your camera. For one thing, these flashes are a lot more sophisticated than the internal ones, but they are also are significantly further away from the lens.

Make the hole smaller. Put away your piece of cardboard, and take one that’s got a smaller hole in it. Try the same trick with the flashlight. As you will see, you will get a reflection in much less of the cases.

Making peoples irises smaller isn’t that hard:

redeye-03.jpgYou could try to turn on the anti-red-eye function that probably exists on your camera. This function usually sends off a few short flashes, or it will shine some other sharp light into your “victim’s” eyes. This makes their irises smaller, and the problem diminishes.

Turn on more lights. This has the same effect as above, but it also has some other advantages: One, you get more even light, two, depending how sophisticated your camera is, it might fire a less strong flash, giving a more natural light. Three: you might get away without using a flash altogether.

Make sure your subjects aren’t drunk. Have you ever noticed that if you take a roll of film at a party, how there seem to be more and more occurrences of the red eyes? Not a coincidence. People who start to become intoxicated have slower reactions - this applies to eyes as well. The eyes just won’t contract, leaving you with red-eyed pictures.

Footnotes:

*) ISO value: “Normal” film is 100 or 200 ISO. If you go to a store and buy some 800 film (or, if you’re all high-tech, set your digital camera to a higher ISO rating), the film will be more sensitive to light, and you will in many situations get away with not having to use a flash

**) Switching to a faster lens on a compact camera is obviously not possible. What few people realise, however, is that many of the entry-level zoom compact cameras have lenses that gather light much better when it is fully zoomed out. In low light, you should therefore consider zooming out and go closer instead of using the zoom to frame your pictures. On an SLR camera, look for a lens with a larger aperture.

Did you like this post? Stay in touch!

If you liked this post, why not stay in touch with Photocritic going forward?

I'm on Flickr and Twitter, or you could add my RSS feed to your favourite feed reader. Or, if you don't fancy doing any of that, drop us a comment below; you can be anonymous if you want to, but if you add a link to your blog or similar, I'll promise I'll come have a look!

Money made from this advert will be invested in beer.
Posted in: All articles • 2 Dec '06

Insights, suggestions and comments

By theRIAA on December 2nd, 2006 (permalink)

very useful information. never new it was red because of blood vessels.

By Tullaman on January 7th, 2008 (permalink)

You can also move the camera closer to the subject and use a wider setting on your zoom. Similar to the other examples this has the effect making the angle from flash to eye to lens larger. And contrary-wise you will notice that red-eye is more of a problem when zoom is used.

By Anna on June 27th, 2008 (permalink)

Good text for photographers, but according to wikipedia, the red color is NOT due to blood vessels:

“The fact that the reflected light is red often is attributed to the ample blood supply of the retina and/or chorium, but this is incorrect. The red-eye effect is due to the color of the fundus, which is due to melanin, a pigment, principally located in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).”

 

Share your wisdom



Current Poll

By the end of the month, will you own an iPhone?
View Results

My recent Flickr favourites

©ashley suzanne taylorWalt Disney Concert Hall 2Caressed by the Sun IIIPale LifeBorage flower"Between the lights and the shadows, a woman sits"End of Day (II)Midsummer!Hair Trim (87/365)Rocas ValleThe Netherlands, insidePaint the town Pink.Have a good day!DSC_4102Bending The Laws of Gravityzot does not like to be woken. zot will kill you with her eyes. And then, maybe, she can get some peace and quiet.
See all my Flickr favourites here

My recent Flickr uploads

near Swingate, ENG, United KingdomWarmenhuizen, North Holland, NetherlandsKorrewegwijk, Groningen, Netherlandsnear Ladegårdshuse, Roskilde, Denmarknear Hornstrup, Vejle, DenmarkVejleHolmenkollen, Oslo, NorwayRogaland reflected in an Arai
See my Flickr galleries here

Photocritic on Twitter...

  • Jul 3 tweet: http://bit.ly/v7PfR was nominated to become a Twitter tee - feel free to vote it down if you think it's lame! :) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: "We shot 50,000 pix, printed 8,000 of them and shot another 1,800 pictures" - http://is.gd/1lTrX (YouTube video / stop motion animation) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: I failed to notice that I now have over 3,000 followers! I'll do my best not to disappoint, stay tuned for Photocritic updates soon. (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: The Human Printer 'prints' photographs in CMYK using felt-tip markers. Bonkers, but very cool: http://is.gd/1li3D (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: I love abstract buildings, strong colours and great lighting, this has it all: http://is.gd/1lh9a (link)
  • Jul 1 tweet: This dude wrote a profile of me which makes me sound like a rock star: http://is.gd/1kK0Y Awesome stuff. (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My book

macrocover.jpg
... is now available from »Amazon.com and »Amazon.co.uk, too!

About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje