Dogma photography
As a kinda-sorta follow-up from my most recent critique, where several of the commenters mentioned that they felt that their photography got better when they imposed rules on themselves, I started thinking: Which other constraints can you put on photography?
First of all — why? Well, in a machoistic kind of way, making rules about the way you take photos is a creative way to think about photography. Take this restraint, for example: For a day, only take photos that have a strong diagonal. It means you start thinking about framing your photographs in a completely different way than you would otherwise. Perhaps you don’t get home with a single photo that is actually worth using, but the lessons you learn from the experiment will come in very handy for later photography assignments.
So, what sort of constraints should you be considering? Well, if you are hardcore enough, why not try and work through this list, from start to finish? If you do decide to try — as always — post a comment to the thread, because I’d absolutely love to see the results of this.
Give it a shot. At worst, you lose a bit of time, and at the very least, you’ll become a more experienced and varied photographer out of it. Perhaps you are even helped towards developing your own photographic style?
Try these rules…
Squaring circles is a long-standing Flickr meme: Taka a photo of something round, and crop it so it becomes a square photo. There are nearly 50,000 photos to use as inspiration, so it’s a good one to get started on!
The Don’t-look-now challenge: Take a series of photos without looking through the viewfinder. Learn to estimate the field of view of your lenses, and try to frame the photos according to the ‘feel’
The 5 shot challenge discussed towards the end of the ‘thinking of photos as paintings’ thread: Take a maximum of 5 photos in a day.
The car challenge: Include a toy car in your photograph.
The ‘my lightmeter broke‘ challenge: You can look through the viewfinder to focus and frame, but you can’t look at what the light meter tells you. Set your camera to fully manual and an appropriate ISO value, and see how well you can estimate shutter times and apertures.
The 20-step challenge: Take 20 steps, then find something to photograph from where you are standing, and click the shutter. It’s an observation game more than anything, but it’s a lot of fun, especially if you compare your results with friends walking the same route or similar.
The interloper challenge: Subtly work a person doing something silly into otherwise good photos. Get them to do Phoons, for example.
Interpret this: Take a line or a verse from a piece of music, and try to illustrate it through photography. If nobody can guess what song it is, try again.
The shoot-from-the-hip challenge: Walk through town, and see how many people you can photograph without being noticed.
Create a longer-term project. Have you seen Smoke, where the main character has to take a photo of the same street at the same time every morning? That sort of thing. Or perhaps you can convince your family to document the tides of time?
Find patterns, whether there are any or not, and start a project bigger than yourself. Like the exactitutes project, which is studying stereotypes and how people let themselves conform to them
Try taking square portraits in black and white, like in our Newyear’s challenge.
The focus challenge — set your lens to a focus somewhere in between infinity and the closest focal range, and don’t change it. All your photos have to be taken at this focus.
The goofy challenge: Collect photos with a common theme. Need some to get you started? Try this PhotoJoJo thread, or have a look at my own project: Locks on toilets.
Frame Storming is like brain storming: Keep taking photos for a whole day, regardless if you have any inspiration or not.
Take a photo a day for a week, but you can only take them on a low-quality camera: A web-cam, a mobile phone camera, or similar. It’s a good way of doing abstact stuff because you can’t get everything you want to into the frame most of the time, and makes you focus on composition and lighting — you have no other parameters to play with!
Face-off challenge: Take a series of portraits, but you’re not allowed to show any part of their face.
Finally, if you are getting the feel for this whole ‘photography with constraints’ thing, try Digital Photo Challenge. They’ve got weekly challenges (along with 24 hour challenges etc). I once tried to submit a photo to every challenge for 6 months. It’s a nightmare, but the commenting and the feedback you get is a great development tool. Just don’t be disheartened: The photos that win aren’t always the best photos: DPChallenge is a bit of an elitist society. Still, worth trying it for a laugh!
Can you think of any other challenges? Post them in the comments!
Did you like this post? Stay in touch!
If you liked this post, why not stay in touch with Photocritic going forward?
I'm on Flickr and Twitter, or you could add my RSS feed to your favourite feed reader. Or, if you don't fancy doing any of that, drop us a comment below; you can be anonymous if you want to, but if you add a link to your blog or similar, I'll promise I'll come have a look!
Insights, suggestions and comments
I am a bit disappointed by this article. The reason is that where it starts off with a serious principle that might help someone understand photography and the medium, the article turns it into some kind of lomo jippo for trendwhores. Instead of calling this “Dogma Photography” why not call it “Single-Theme photography” or something. The famous Dogma for Filmmaking gives a lot more meaning to this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogma_95
Stig — Now now, that’s somewhat harsh criticism, I feel? I’m fully aware of the dogma genre (I used to live in Norway, and Trier + co’s madness was covered in the news there quite a bit), but can it be completely transferred to photography?
I mean, if anyone feels like writing a full set of Dogma rules for photography, I’d be more than happy to publish the article!
- Haje
It’s not very hard to make dogma rules, the hard part is following them. I have my own very personal set (which differs wildly from von Trier, et.al), but an easy naturalistic-tilted adaption of von Trier’s film dogma can be made in three minutes:
- Shoot things as they are with available light, that is without adding/changing lights/flash, adding props or staging events
- Always shoot handheld, a tripod robs you of spontaneity
- Always use natural-looking colour film, preferrably slide-film as it allows no post-processing and what is shot is what you get.
- Always use a normal lens that doesn’t distort the perspective of the human eye and avoid filters
- Always use 35mm film. You crop as you press the shutter.
- Don’t sign your photos or leave trademark tokens in the shot
Naturally, more time spent on a set of dogma and focus on what you are investigating would allow for a more precise set. The above would naturally favour a certain way of approaching a no-nonsense result.
-Stig
now now, Stig–
Quite a few of your rules sound an awful lot like “lomo jippo for trendwhores,” especially as concerns spontaneity and use of available light. Maybe a little Lomography is just what you need-
Share your wisdom