Photocritic likes to keep you guessing.

Photocritic Logo: The Making Of

I’ve had a lot of great, very nice comments about my new logo, and a few questions – Oliver, who made the logo, kindly agreed to talk about it a little bit.

If you don’t care much about design or logos, feel free to skip this post :)

Oliver, do your thing:

It starts off pretty simple. I lean back in my rocking chair and wait until things come to mind which are related to “photography”.

A lens, eyes, a finger pushing the shutter release button, aperture, light, photos, my DSLR, photographic history, the photo development process and other things. Then i pick up my pen and throw all this on
paper.

While doing this I might start with quite complex shapes, but I keep simplifying over and over again if I like an idea and follow it.

For the Photocritic logo I first thought of the people that make photos. I used simplified shapes of a finger pushing a button, a person holding a camera, a human head which contained a camera… but
this was a dead end.

Then i focused on the photos. I drew a piece of paper with a stylized glow, a polaroid and some more paper-like items that didn’t work as well. Here you get a bit of frustration. On the 2nd idea already!

But the ideas will not stop flowing through my mind. Some results looked rather weird and totally out of context: Film rolls, crippled fingers, human heads with lenses as eyes, some alien hand holding a
head… that’s enough!

Then I drew a stylized eye just for fun and started modifying it… suddenly it clicked!

clicked-all

CLICK! I remembered my focusing screen I bought a few weeks ago. I wanted it because of the grid lines which makes composition a lot easier. Bam! I thought of my first camera and the focusing screen that
was inside. Those were the times… looking into the viewfinder and then match the two half circles to get a sharp image. High Tech!

I sticked to that idea pretty quickly and liked it from the start. I was sure that the “distortion” inside the focusing screen could add a nice element, but won’t be very easy on the eye on first glance. At this point I turned to Photoshop and started the design in there. The design was already done in my head (after looking up what those focusing screens actually looked like haha).

And then there was the word “Photocritic”. Hmm. What should I do with it? I just used “PC” and put it inside my design. It didnt work. Changing fonts. Hmm. Another font. This one is good! The font was the hardest part. But luckily I had hundreds to choose from. I was still a bit sceptic if people would misunderstand the letters as “PC = Personal Computer”. But hey, people are not stupid – they are one a photo blog and will make the connection quickly.

Then I was satisfied and started on the colour palette. I picked the colours from the photocritic site and made variations of the surrounding circle, the PC letters and the other elements. Its just a matter of finding a good contrast, I have no specific rule when I like a certain colour combination. Haje liked one combination in particular and me too. So I sticked to it and submitted the final design.

Haje then spent quite a bit of time fiddling with the logo, but ultimately decided that it worked very well as it originally was: After a few emails it was agreed that the logo worked fine. Nothing was really changed afterwards. I hope you like it too ;-)

Thank you!

Check out Oliver’s work on Flickr, stalk him on Twitter, and check out his website while you’re at it!

Money made from this advert will be invested in prime lenses.
This post, "Photocritic Logo: The Making Of", is part of these categories: All articles, Meta, was posted by Haje Jan Kamps and saw the light of day on the 22nd of April 2009. I hope you liked it.

Insights, suggestions and comments

By Moon on April 29th, 2009 (permalink)

Thanks for the post… really interesting to get insights on the making of a logo as well as the inspiration behind it. Definitely a creative process! So appreciate you sharing this with us.

 

Share your wisdom



Go on, click the button

So, the 550D and the 50D cost practically the same, and have different advantages. Which one would you buy?
View Results

Get notified!

If you want to get a notification whenever Photocritic makes a new post, fill in the form below!

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox

I love this on Flickr

On the Book of Face

Photocritic on Facebook

It goes 'tweet'

  • • Seems a bit pointless to me, but Canon is buying the .canon top level domain: http://is.gd/aLJEp . Why? (link)
  • • That goes in the same category as ExpertSexChange.com and PsychoTheRapist.com, I suppose. (link)
  • • ferrethandjobs.com is actually a completely SFW domain, despite the hillarious URL. I'm enough of a geek to enjoy that. (link)
  • • RT @petemc: You can use my discount code when you buy Photomatix and save 15%. Code is: VanillaDays. #hdr #photography http://bit.ly/RvywC (link)
  • • Microchip? That's a funny name for a dog. http://flic.kr/p/7L9Ei8 #Flickr (link)
  • • Magnificent MC: the 1960 BMW R69S. A beautiful gallery. http://bit.ly/dsLINa /via @BikeEXIF (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My books

Macro Photography Photo Workshop

Macro Photography Photo Workshop by Haje Jan Kamps My day job, if it can be called that, is being a writer. I've got one book out there so far and it's awesome, so go ahead and buy a copy! It's available from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and most decent-sized bookshops, too!

To find out more, check out this post! If you want to know more about the 'being a writer' thing, check this site out.

Put another dime in the jukebox

Put another dime in the jukebox In front of you, five hyperactive men with guitars, drums, and microphones. Behind you, five thousand fans. In your hands, a camera... You're going to need more than just a little bit of good luck to pull this one off. That's where this book comes in.

With nearly a hundred fantastic gig photos, and a ton of info about how to get involved in taking photos like this yourself, you can't go wrong. Buy this book. Grab your camera. Good luck.

Street Photography: London

Street Photography: London Take a Canon EOS 450D. Attach a Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens. Hit the streets of London. See what happens.

Sounds simple - but the results are anything but. Moving, intense, and personal, Street Photography: London is a great collection of the people of London, their passions, and their dreams. Look for yourself!


About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje