<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMG everything looks weird!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pen</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-92326</link>
		<dc:creator>Pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-92326</guid>
		<description>any change is a good change. nice move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any change is a good change. nice move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>I acctually quite like it, but you should use a bigger font. The one you are using now is way to small for me to read if the text is a bit long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I acctually quite like it, but you should use a bigger font. The one you are using now is way to small for me to read if the text is a bit long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7210</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7210</guid>
		<description>This one is cleaner and the information is easyer to find.
But I preffered the previous look.

Anyway, I don't really mind the design 'caus the content is the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is cleaner and the information is easyer to find.<br />
But I preffered the previous look.</p>
<p>Anyway, I don&#8217;t really mind the design &#8216;caus the content is the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Kostrrubiak</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Kostrrubiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>I think that the new design is a quite nice one.

The only think I'm not sure about is the background image in the top left of the page.  What exactly is it, and what's it doing there?  Is it wood?  Is it...?  I think that should go, but otherwise I think the new design is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the new design is a quite nice one.</p>
<p>The only think I&#8217;m not sure about is the background image in the top left of the page.  What exactly is it, and what&#8217;s it doing there?  Is it wood?  Is it&#8230;?  I think that should go, but otherwise I think the new design is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>It looks like a clown puked after eating too much candy.  It's hideous and amateur looking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a clown puked after eating too much candy.  It&#8217;s hideous and amateur looking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7110</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7110</guid>
		<description>the old one was simple prexisting template... so any move away from that is good. however the 4 images at the top kinda look like buttons but aren't... not crazy about that... it makes me think the site has color coding but it hasn't
menu bar pn left is nice n clean so that's good
i think the search button should be visible from top of page (feature is used a lot on similar sites)
change is good.
good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the old one was simple prexisting template&#8230; so any move away from that is good. however the 4 images at the top kinda look like buttons but aren&#8217;t&#8230; not crazy about that&#8230; it makes me think the site has color coding but it hasn&#8217;t<br />
menu bar pn left is nice n clean so that&#8217;s good<br />
i think the search button should be visible from top of page (feature is used a lot on similar sites)<br />
change is good.<br />
good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camera Man</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7109</link>
		<dc:creator>Camera Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7109</guid>
		<description>Old was cleaner and nicer looking! Not sure about the colours in this new one..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old was cleaner and nicer looking! Not sure about the colours in this new one..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Metz</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7107</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Metz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7107</guid>
		<description>I think it's rather cluttered and squeezed together.What you could do would be to make the frame a bit wider and put more white space between the items.
The contrast between text and background is also rather low.
And finally, the item "Equipment protection" in the menu doesn't display correctly for me. (on Firefox 2.0 - its displayed in two lines while overlapping the item below it)

Kudos for changing the style though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s rather cluttered and squeezed together.What you could do would be to make the frame a bit wider and put more white space between the items.<br />
The contrast between text and background is also rather low.<br />
And finally, the item &#8220;Equipment protection&#8221; in the menu doesn&#8217;t display correctly for me. (on Firefox 2.0 - its displayed in two lines while overlapping the item below it)</p>
<p>Kudos for changing the style though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolever</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7091</link>
		<dc:creator>wolever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7091</guid>
		<description>I dunno... The old one was a bit plain, but I think the new is a bit flashy... Took me a little while to figure out what I was supposed to be reading the first time I saw it.  Better than the default WP theme though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno&#8230; The old one was a bit plain, but I think the new is a bit flashy&#8230; Took me a little while to figure out what I was supposed to be reading the first time I saw it.  Better than the default WP theme though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/omg-everything-looks-weird/#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>I really liked the simple, clean design of the old one. Another thing I liked was that it was a photography blog that didn't try and jam umpteen million different photos into their logo or on their front page. There were just relevant photos for the articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the simple, clean design of the old one. Another thing I liked was that it was a photography blog that didn&#8217;t try and jam umpteen million different photos into their logo or on their front page. There were just relevant photos for the articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
