<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which camera is this?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-291377</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-291377</guid>
		<description>It definately LOOKS like a Canon G9. However, the G9 does not have a tilted lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It definately LOOKS like a Canon G9. However, the G9 does not have a tilted lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoJo</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-279604</link>
		<dc:creator>MoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-279604</guid>
		<description>It looks like a Canon G9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a Canon G9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Butler</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-239223</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-239223</guid>
		<description>The camera is a mixture of:

Olympus 35 RC rangefinder
Sigma DP1
and a Sony Alpha 350 with Minolta 50mm f/1.4 on it.

Richard - DPReview</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The camera is a mixture of:</p>
<p>Olympus 35 RC rangefinder<br />
Sigma DP1<br />
and a Sony Alpha 350 with Minolta 50mm f/1.4 on it.</p>
<p>Richard - DPReview</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flytrap</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-237929</link>
		<dc:creator>Flytrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-237929</guid>
		<description>Looks like a Leica to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a Leica to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-237769</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-237769</guid>
		<description>That is a Sigma point and shoot with some advanced features, it is a very good camera iq wise but very limited feature wise.  It sells for about $1,000 us.  Very rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a Sigma point and shoot with some advanced features, it is a very good camera iq wise but very limited feature wise.  It sells for about $1,000 us.  Very rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-237631</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-237631</guid>
		<description>what's the joke? you already know what the camera is?  it isn't a camera at all?  pretty idiotic excuse for a joke, don't you think?

a better joke would have been to go back to the clown barf website template</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s the joke? you already know what the camera is?  it isn&#8217;t a camera at all?  pretty idiotic excuse for a joke, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>a better joke would have been to go back to the clown barf website template</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luís Brás</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-236489</link>
		<dc:creator>Luís Brás</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-236489</guid>
		<description>I thought so :-), but don't leave us in the dark, now. What was the camera, after all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought so :-), but don&#8217;t leave us in the dark, now. What was the camera, after all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haje Jan Kamps</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-236109</link>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-236109</guid>
		<description>Aw, I'm so sorry all - it was all an April's fools' joke in collaboration with the amazing DPReview!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, I&#8217;m so sorry all - it was all an April&#8217;s fools&#8217; joke in collaboration with the amazing DPReview!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djenan</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-235805</link>
		<dc:creator>Djenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-235805</guid>
		<description>Maybe a Leica D-Lux 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a Leica D-Lux 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-235704</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-235704</guid>
		<description>look at the 3rd pic (whatis-22) it is most definitely an lcd and not a strap.  as for it being a leica, it is likely that it is (or a clone, like the rd-1)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look at the 3rd pic (whatis-22) it is most definitely an lcd and not a strap.  as for it being a leica, it is likely that it is (or a clone, like the rd-1)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sendermen</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-235321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sendermen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-235321</guid>
		<description>You're right, I haven't seen a DP1 with a swivel display...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I haven&#8217;t seen a DP1 with a swivel display&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Piper</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-235227</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-235227</guid>
		<description>FILM Leica M - likely M4-2 or M4-P (from the matte black "chrome" finish, lack of visible red dot, and recessed viewfinder - M6 and later have flush viewfinder glass). Angled Leica rewind crank visible on the top corner at this end. Camera with NO meter, so the photographer is looking DOWN at it to set aperture (note left thumb on lens's aperture ring) and shutter speed using the dials.

The "LCD" is just a tag end of camera strap sticking out where he is gripping the camera with his right hand.

Good joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FILM Leica M - likely M4-2 or M4-P (from the matte black &#8220;chrome&#8221; finish, lack of visible red dot, and recessed viewfinder - M6 and later have flush viewfinder glass). Angled Leica rewind crank visible on the top corner at this end. Camera with NO meter, so the photographer is looking DOWN at it to set aperture (note left thumb on lens&#8217;s aperture ring) and shutter speed using the dials.</p>
<p>The &#8220;LCD&#8221; is just a tag end of camera strap sticking out where he is gripping the camera with his right hand.</p>
<p>Good joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poop09</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-235087</link>
		<dc:creator>poop09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-235087</guid>
		<description>the rd1 lcd flips all the way around.  behind the lcd, it has an old school exposure diagram like film cameras (which is nice because it protects the lcd from scratches)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the rd1 lcd flips all the way around.  behind the lcd, it has an old school exposure diagram like film cameras (which is nice because it protects the lcd from scratches)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-235047</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-235047</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtLylj3V-EQ&#38;feature=related
YouTube - Sigma DP1 user review

my guess is dp1 sigma, though the epson rd-1 looks like a better match (though it's an older camers)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtLylj3V-EQ&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtLylj3V-EQ&amp;feature=related</a><br />
YouTube - Sigma DP1 user review</p>
<p>my guess is dp1 sigma, though the epson rd-1 looks like a better match (though it&#8217;s an older camers)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sendermen</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-235025</link>
		<dc:creator>Sendermen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-235025</guid>
		<description>A Sigma DP1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Sigma DP1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234848</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234848</guid>
		<description>It looks like an really old digital camera... My art teacher has one for studio photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like an really old digital camera&#8230; My art teacher has one for studio photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haje Jan Kamps</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234831</link>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234831</guid>
		<description>What really flummoxed me was that the screen seemed to hinge upwards - what's the logic in that? Most of the time, if you do need to use a hinged screen, it is to take the photo when holding the camera above your head (so you look up at the display)... Right? 

.. unless it is actually a double hinge, so it goes both ways, but it didn't look like that, somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really flummoxed me was that the screen seemed to hinge upwards - what&#8217;s the logic in that? Most of the time, if you do need to use a hinged screen, it is to take the photo when holding the camera above your head (so you look up at the display)&#8230; Right? </p>
<p>.. unless it is actually a double hinge, so it goes both ways, but it didn&#8217;t look like that, somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234825</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234825</guid>
		<description>Sigma DP1 with a photoman lcd screen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma DP1 with a photoman lcd screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234824</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234824</guid>
		<description>Sigma DP-1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma DP-1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Barrett</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234822</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234822</guid>
		<description>Just an FYI the Olympus e-330 which was released early 2006 had the first live view with a tilting screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an FYI the Olympus e-330 which was released early 2006 had the first live view with a tilting screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Janelle</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234746</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Janelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234746</guid>
		<description>The new sigma possibly?  It's a digital rangefinder with aps-c sized sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new sigma possibly?  It&#8217;s a digital rangefinder with aps-c sized sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kjetil</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234731</link>
		<dc:creator>Kjetil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234731</guid>
		<description>It's not an R-D1 (or R-D1s which is a firmware-upgraded version of the former). Hinge on LCD is the top edge rather than on the left edge. Rangefinders with brightline viewfinders all have that white window between the normal viewfinder window and the rangefinder window to collect light for the brightlines. Also the top-plate of the epson has edge running a straight line all the way across the front of the camera, so this is not one. 

My initial reaction to the first image was to think this might be a Zeiss Ikon body. 
http://www.zeiss.com/zeissikon

The guy in the picture looks sort of like one of the faces that pop up in dpreview sample galleries from time to time, though. This being April Fools day and all, let's say it is a prototype digital Zeiss Ikon with hinged LCD and the 24MP Sony 36x24mm sensor announced earlier this year :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not an R-D1 (or R-D1s which is a firmware-upgraded version of the former). Hinge on LCD is the top edge rather than on the left edge. Rangefinders with brightline viewfinders all have that white window between the normal viewfinder window and the rangefinder window to collect light for the brightlines. Also the top-plate of the epson has edge running a straight line all the way across the front of the camera, so this is not one. </p>
<p>My initial reaction to the first image was to think this might be a Zeiss Ikon body.<br />
<a href="http://www.zeiss.com/zeissikon" rel="nofollow">http://www.zeiss.com/zeissikon</a></p>
<p>The guy in the picture looks sort of like one of the faces that pop up in dpreview sample galleries from time to time, though. This being April Fools day and all, let&#8217;s say it is a prototype digital Zeiss Ikon with hinged LCD and the 24MP Sony 36&#215;24mm sensor announced earlier this year :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikMik</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234723</link>
		<dc:creator>MikMik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234723</guid>
		<description>Larry, yes, it seems the LCD tilts the other way. I thought that it could be a visual effect (that it could be to the left) but in the second image it seems I was wrong.
Anyway, i looks like a rangefinder, and I think there are no other rangefinders out there, apart from the R-D1 and R-D1s and Leica M8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, yes, it seems the LCD tilts the other way. I thought that it could be a visual effect (that it could be to the left) but in the second image it seems I was wrong.<br />
Anyway, i looks like a rangefinder, and I think there are no other rangefinders out there, apart from the R-D1 and R-D1s and Leica M8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikMik</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234709</link>
		<dc:creator>MikMik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234709</guid>
		<description>Well, it seems that R-D1 and R-D1s are different cameras, but quite symilar in the look, anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems that R-D1 and R-D1s are different cameras, but quite symilar in the look, anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234704</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234704</guid>
		<description>MikMik here's a picture of the RD-1, doesn't it's LCD tilt the other way?

http://www.chaudigital.com/assetts/img/epson_rd1_rear.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MikMik here&#8217;s a picture of the RD-1, doesn&#8217;t it&#8217;s LCD tilt the other way?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chaudigital.com/assetts/img/epson_rd1_rear.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.chaudigital.com/assetts/img/epson_rd1_rear.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikMik</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234690</link>
		<dc:creator>MikMik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234690</guid>
		<description>After looking again at your pictures and those of the R-D1, I'm quite sure it is that camera. It has a white square over the lens and a bigger black one to the left of it (it can be seen on your 2nd picture). It has a tilting LCD and manual focus lenses (leica)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After looking again at your pictures and those of the R-D1, I&#8217;m quite sure it is that camera. It has a white square over the lens and a bigger black one to the left of it (it can be seen on your 2nd picture). It has a tilting LCD and manual focus lenses (leica)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendo</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234686</link>
		<dc:creator>brendo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234686</guid>
		<description>April Fools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April Fools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234683</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234683</guid>
		<description>Big viewfinder though, looks more like a rangefinder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big viewfinder though, looks more like a rangefinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikMik</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234672</link>
		<dc:creator>MikMik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234672</guid>
		<description>Epson Rangefinder R-D1s ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epson Rangefinder R-D1s ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hlgr</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mystery-camera/#comment-234567</link>
		<dc:creator>hlgr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2008/mystery-camera/#comment-234567</guid>
		<description>doesnt look to me like a dslr to be honest, maybe something along the lines of a canon g9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doesnt look to me like a dslr to be honest, maybe something along the lines of a canon g9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
