<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile macro magic!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mich</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-69168</link>
		<dc:creator>Mich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-69168</guid>
		<description>http://new.taeint.net/mich/img/LJ/tmb_beetle.jpg
http://new.taeint.net/mich/img/LJ/tmb_beetle_size.jpg

- were made by SE w800i using build-in diode light, croped and resized (ok, little saturation and contrast in PS :} )
i use macro with night mode - seems w800 try to use lower ISO in "night" (? or not :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://new.taeint.net/mich/img/LJ/tmb_beetle.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://new.taeint.net/mich/img/LJ/tmb_beetle.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://new.taeint.net/mich/img/LJ/tmb_beetle_size.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://new.taeint.net/mich/img/LJ/tmb_beetle_size.jpg</a></p>
<p>- were made by SE w800i using build-in diode light, croped and resized (ok, little saturation and contrast in PS :} )<br />
i use macro with night mode - seems w800 try to use lower ISO in &#8220;night&#8221; (? or not :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Perchick</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-57719</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Perchick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-57719</guid>
		<description>The photo of my son's eyes was not doctored or processed much at all - see my &lt;a href="http://blog.remez.com/2007/03/21/mobile-macro-magic/" rel="nofollow"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; for details - basically, just a bit of sharpening was done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photo of my son&#8217;s eyes was not doctored or processed much at all - see my <a href="http://blog.remez.com/2007/03/21/mobile-macro-magic/" rel="nofollow">blog post</a> for details - basically, just a bit of sharpening was done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-56901</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-56901</guid>
		<description>I think Sony uses Zeiss on their DSLR line.  Will they use that on their phone too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sony uses Zeiss on their DSLR line.  Will they use that on their phone too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theederv</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-56509</link>
		<dc:creator>Theederv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-56509</guid>
		<description>I strongly believe that the age of digital photography has allowed almost anybody with a basic technical skill to take a half descent photo. And now within that age we are exploring whats available to the end user with regards to mobile phone camera technology. It wasnt long ago that the prospect of taking an image with a handset seemed a distant dream, for many of us this would have been dismissed as a novelty, a gimmick or a non-nesscesity. Then we moved through the VGA age where really the images people were taking were only good for a laugh, or to enjoy the occasional blurred image of the children or pets. The flash consisted of a bright LED that had trouble lighting even a couple of feet in front. Today is the time where mobile phone cameras have become a truly useful tool, the Sony Ericsson K800 (my photos are taken with) has a xenon flash and a very boast worthy 3.2MP, the Cybershot division of Sony have provided all the features you would expect from a compact camera including a wonderful macro mode and auto focus. The magic happens in print, bluetooth the images to a printer and 7x9 images look almost identical to those taken with a film camera...............thats special!

I dont really know where I'm going with this, it's late lol

I actually work in mobile phones at the moment, whilst i freelance on the side.

I'm very please that you guys would be interested in my pics, I must say that there was a small amount of PS work to correct colours and sharpen up a little....but it just goes to show whats possible



p.s look out for the Nokia N95 with a 5MP Carl Zeiss Optics Lens.....should be impressive, although I spoke to a Sony Rep the other day and a 5MP Sony Ericsson will be available in the UK around august (sony cams are always better)

Regards

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly believe that the age of digital photography has allowed almost anybody with a basic technical skill to take a half descent photo. And now within that age we are exploring whats available to the end user with regards to mobile phone camera technology. It wasnt long ago that the prospect of taking an image with a handset seemed a distant dream, for many of us this would have been dismissed as a novelty, a gimmick or a non-nesscesity. Then we moved through the VGA age where really the images people were taking were only good for a laugh, or to enjoy the occasional blurred image of the children or pets. The flash consisted of a bright LED that had trouble lighting even a couple of feet in front. Today is the time where mobile phone cameras have become a truly useful tool, the Sony Ericsson K800 (my photos are taken with) has a xenon flash and a very boast worthy 3.2MP, the Cybershot division of Sony have provided all the features you would expect from a compact camera including a wonderful macro mode and auto focus. The magic happens in print, bluetooth the images to a printer and 7&#215;9 images look almost identical to those taken with a film camera&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;thats special!</p>
<p>I dont really know where I&#8217;m going with this, it&#8217;s late lol</p>
<p>I actually work in mobile phones at the moment, whilst i freelance on the side.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very please that you guys would be interested in my pics, I must say that there was a small amount of PS work to correct colours and sharpen up a little&#8230;.but it just goes to show whats possible</p>
<p>p.s look out for the Nokia N95 with a 5MP Carl Zeiss Optics Lens&#8230;..should be impressive, although I spoke to a Sony Rep the other day and a 5MP Sony Ericsson will be available in the UK around august (sony cams are always better)</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-55436</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-55436</guid>
		<description>This is what I was talking about:  http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Voyeur-Right-Angle-Canon/dp/B000F49052</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I was talking about:  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Voyeur-Right-Angle-Canon/dp/B000F49052" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Voyeur-Right-Angle-Canon/dp/B000F49052</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigstusexy</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-55224</link>
		<dc:creator>bigstusexy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-55224</guid>
		<description>Hrm... I know my new camera does accept filters not sure if I ever hear of a 'girl watcher' but I might have seen pictures taken with them! heh.  No she doesn't shy way if the camera is out and on unless she knows its probably to get her, she has her times though when she doesn't mind as much, usually when she is distracted by fun or what have you.

Next up though is her younger sister who I am worried about, you know heavy on the lipstick and skimpy clothes, always gets sick and wants to go home but is never there when the family gets back etc etc.  I know &lt;i&gt;she&lt;/i&gt; will not have a problem taking pictures at all I'll just have to not shoot in tiff too much :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm&#8230; I know my new camera does accept filters not sure if I ever hear of a &#8216;girl watcher&#8217; but I might have seen pictures taken with them! heh.  No she doesn&#8217;t shy way if the camera is out and on unless she knows its probably to get her, she has her times though when she doesn&#8217;t mind as much, usually when she is distracted by fun or what have you.</p>
<p>Next up though is her younger sister who I am worried about, you know heavy on the lipstick and skimpy clothes, always gets sick and wants to go home but is never there when the family gets back etc etc.  I know <i>she</i> will not have a problem taking pictures at all I&#8217;ll just have to not shoot in tiff too much :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-54227</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-54227</guid>
		<description>To Bigstusexy:   do they still sell "girl watcher" attachments?  Used to be you could buy attachments that screwed on to the front of the lens (filter style) that looked like a big lens hood, but really it was a mirror mounted at a 45-degree angle.  The idea being you could take it to the beach and get candids of sunbathers while it appeared you were shooting seascapes.

If you're handy, you might try making something like that for your camera.  If your friend's sister sees the camera pointed another direction, would she still freak out, or just think you were aiming at something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Bigstusexy:   do they still sell &#8220;girl watcher&#8221; attachments?  Used to be you could buy attachments that screwed on to the front of the lens (filter style) that looked like a big lens hood, but really it was a mirror mounted at a 45-degree angle.  The idea being you could take it to the beach and get candids of sunbathers while it appeared you were shooting seascapes.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re handy, you might try making something like that for your camera.  If your friend&#8217;s sister sees the camera pointed another direction, would she still freak out, or just think you were aiming at something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigstusexy</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-54112</link>
		<dc:creator>bigstusexy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2007/mobile-macro-magic/#comment-54112</guid>
		<description>Was there a lot of post processing done?  These are honestly THE BEST ever photos I've seen from a device like that.  Now I'll grant that alot of those pictures I've seen from them get generally better the more you decrease the size but still.  


Maybe its where I am and the USA in general, I've seen a shot with a 3mp camera phone that was generally impressive when I was looking to buy my first PnS years back, I don't think anything that good is generally available here yet.  


You are right about being able to get closer to subjects, my friends sister whom is mentally handicapped and probably many years from now get use to having her picture taken wont stand still for one.  I became the hero for getting a few Graduation shots with my older camera in a manual mode so I could shave the time off of autofocus and metering and get shots when she didn't notice.  However until she found out my friends phone had a camera in it she didn't mind when it was pointed at her, and most times now she'll not notice when its out but she'll still run from my new camera if the lens cap is off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there a lot of post processing done?  These are honestly THE BEST ever photos I&#8217;ve seen from a device like that.  Now I&#8217;ll grant that alot of those pictures I&#8217;ve seen from them get generally better the more you decrease the size but still.  </p>
<p>Maybe its where I am and the USA in general, I&#8217;ve seen a shot with a 3mp camera phone that was generally impressive when I was looking to buy my first PnS years back, I don&#8217;t think anything that good is generally available here yet.  </p>
<p>You are right about being able to get closer to subjects, my friends sister whom is mentally handicapped and probably many years from now get use to having her picture taken wont stand still for one.  I became the hero for getting a few Graduation shots with my older camera in a manual mode so I could shave the time off of autofocus and metering and get shots when she didn&#8217;t notice.  However until she found out my friends phone had a camera in it she didn&#8217;t mind when it was pointed at her, and most times now she&#8217;ll not notice when its out but she&#8217;ll still run from my new camera if the lens cap is off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
