Better manual focus on Digital SLRs

Posted by Haje Jan Kamps

Picture-31.jpgWith todays autofocus systems, most manufacturers are shipping their cameras with simple matte focusing screens. All good and well when the technologies are working, but what when they aren’t?

Focusing manually is an art, but a split-screen precision ground focussing matte screen can take a lot of the guesswork out of manually focussing a camera - if you have used a manual medium-format camera or an older SLR, you know what we’re talking about.

So what do you do, if you still want one of these old focussing screens? In most modern DSLRs, they aren’t officially replacable. But this is a DIY blog, and surely there must be something you can do? Well, there is, actually. It’s a rather spectacular way of voiding the warranty on your expensive DSLR, but if you want to… A better focus screen for digital SLR explains to some detail how it can be done.

We need more projects like this - I like reading about stuff that is too over the top for me to dare try myself.

Did you like this post? Stay in touch!

If you liked this post, why not stay in touch with Photocritic going forward?

I'm on Flickr and Twitter, or you could add my RSS feed to your favourite feed reader. Or, if you don't fancy doing any of that, drop us a comment below; you can be anonymous if you want to, but if you add a link to your blog or similar, I'll promise I'll come have a look!

Money made from this advert will be invested in beer.
Posted in: All articles • 29 Mar '06

Insights, suggestions and comments

By Stu on March 29th, 2006 (permalink)

Noooo!

I’ve been having trouble with my manual-focus OM lenses I use with an adaptor on my 20D. You are _really_ tempting me, but I _know_ it’s a bad idea. Really. A really really bad idea.

By Administrator on March 29th, 2006 (permalink)

Stu, if you end up doing it, let me know… Take pictures of the process!

By Stu on March 29th, 2006 (permalink)

What with?

(haha - do you see what I did there?)

There is approximately a 0.001% chance that I would attempt this. However, I would _definitely_ get photos if I did it.

It’d probably be cheaper in statistical terms just to buy EF replacements of the old lenses I’m using.

 

Share your wisdom



Current Poll

By the end of the month, will you own an iPhone?
View Results

My recent Flickr favourites

Sweet as sin and black as hell©ashley suzanne taylorWalt Disney Concert Hall 2Caressed by the Sun IIIPale LifeBorage flower"Between the lights and the shadows, a woman sits"End of Day (II)Midsummer!Hair Trim (87/365)Rocas ValleThe Netherlands, insidePaint the town Pink.Have a good day!DSC_4102Bending The Laws of Gravity
See all my Flickr favourites here

My recent Flickr uploads

near Swingate, ENG, United KingdomWarmenhuizen, North Holland, NetherlandsKorrewegwijk, Groningen, Netherlandsnear Ladegårdshuse, Roskilde, Denmarknear Hornstrup, Vejle, DenmarkVejleHolmenkollen, Oslo, NorwayRogaland reflected in an Arai
See my Flickr galleries here

Photocritic on Twitter...

  • Jul 5 tweet: 58 crazy-good photography tutorials has lots of good tips (and features one of mine at #40 :) http://is.gd/1nPHc (link)
  • Jul 5 tweet: Awesome photograph by the lovley @phototropy; Sweet as sin and black as hell http://is.gd/1nyDp (link)
  • Jul 3 tweet: http://bit.ly/v7PfR was nominated to become a Twitter tee - feel free to vote it down if you think it's lame! :) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: "We shot 50,000 pix, printed 8,000 of them and shot another 1,800 pictures" - http://is.gd/1lTrX (YouTube video / stop motion animation) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: I failed to notice that I now have over 3,000 followers! I'll do my best not to disappoint, stay tuned for Photocritic updates soon. (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: The Human Printer 'prints' photographs in CMYK using felt-tip markers. Bonkers, but very cool: http://is.gd/1li3D (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My book

macrocover.jpg
... is now available from »Amazon.com and »Amazon.co.uk, too!

About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje