<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Lomography physically different?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/lomo-lomography-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/lomo-lomography-explained/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maua</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/lomo-lomography-explained/#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>Maua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/lomo-lomography-explained/#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>Sweet, thans for introducing lomo to me, when i get my paycheck, ill get one of those cheap fisheye cameras! Yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet, thans for introducing lomo to me, when i get my paycheck, ill get one of those cheap fisheye cameras! Yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/lomo-lomography-explained/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/lomo-lomography-explained/#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>I understand the point he's trying to make about it just being a camera and its really about the photographer making stylistic decisions but any ol' camera can't reproduce that distinct brightness in the middle of the frame and slight vignetting along the edges like a lomo lca can, the lomo's lens optics and focal length are the reason for that. So yes, a lomo is physically different from other cameras but you can apply the same lomo-esque sensibilities to any camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the point he&#8217;s trying to make about it just being a camera and its really about the photographer making stylistic decisions but any ol&#8217; camera can&#8217;t reproduce that distinct brightness in the middle of the frame and slight vignetting along the edges like a lomo lca can, the lomo&#8217;s lens optics and focal length are the reason for that. So yes, a lomo is physically different from other cameras but you can apply the same lomo-esque sensibilities to any camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
