<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go on, indie kid, you know you want to.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/independent-cinema-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/independent-cinema-look/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Haje Jan Kamps</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/independent-cinema-look/#comment-10043</link>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/independent-cinema-look/#comment-10043</guid>
		<description>If you think you can do better - and you probably can - go for it, and post a before-and-after shot! I'm only trying to spark some inspiration, here, folks :)

- Haje</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think you can do better - and you probably can - go for it, and post a before-and-after shot! I&#8217;m only trying to spark some inspiration, here, folks :)</p>
<p>- Haje</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Bost</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/independent-cinema-look/#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Bost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/independent-cinema-look/#comment-9867</guid>
		<description>I believe andrew is right.  Your end result does in fact look like a security still. The image in the film frame fits more the lines of the subject of the article.    Too much contrasty grain in both examples though, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe andrew is right.  Your end result does in fact look like a security still. The image in the film frame fits more the lines of the subject of the article.    Too much contrasty grain in both examples though, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/independent-cinema-look/#comment-9790</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/independent-cinema-look/#comment-9790</guid>
		<description>quis: Yeah it's different for cine film, the way he's edited it in is correct.

I'm sorry Haje, but I really don't see the purpose in this. The finished product from the comparison (not the faux-film composite) just looks like bad security camera video.

Perhaps I'm being narrowminded, but this doesn't strike me as having anything to do with indie cinema.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quis: Yeah it&#8217;s different for cine film, the way he&#8217;s edited it in is correct.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry Haje, but I really don&#8217;t see the purpose in this. The finished product from the comparison (not the faux-film composite) just looks like bad security camera video.</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m being narrowminded, but this doesn&#8217;t strike me as having anything to do with indie cinema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quis</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/independent-cinema-look/#comment-9784</link>
		<dc:creator>quis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/independent-cinema-look/#comment-9784</guid>
		<description>Um, if we're talking 35mm film like what goes in an SLR then the long side of the frame should be parallel with the sprocket holes. If it's different for cine film then excuse me for being an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, if we&#8217;re talking 35mm film like what goes in an SLR then the long side of the frame should be parallel with the sprocket holes. If it&#8217;s different for cine film then excuse me for being an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
