Implied nudity in portraiture

Oh will you look at that. How very Web 2.0!

It doesn’t take much of a brain to fathom what a ‘nude’ photo is. If bits that are normally covered up on the beach are on display, then it’s a nude.

Similarly, a ‘non-nude’ photo is pretty straightforward: There are no hoo-hoos, wee-wees or breasticles on display.

So, what is all this ‘implied nudity’ stuff all about? Well, it turns out that there’s an ‘in-between’ stage of nude photography: Implied nudity. Used creatively, it can add an interesting dimension to your portraiture. Here’s how and why.

Not a terrible portrait, but it isn't exactly super exciting ever. But there seems to be a lot of skin on display. Hmm, I wonder if I can make this photo more interesting... (click for bigger)

Put very simply, implied nudity happens in one of two ways: The model is dressed, but the photo is shot in a way where it looks as if she might not be. Or the model might be in some state of undress, but the photo is shot in such a way (through lighting, perhaps, or by the model’s position), where you can’t be sure whether or not they are naked.

So, er, what’s the point?

Humans are funny creatures: our minds constantly play tricks on us. When pieces of information are missing, our minds tend to ‘fill in’ the information. When you read smthng lk ths sntnce, your mind doesn’t really struggle to fill in the missing letters, for example – the same happens in photography. In a photo where a model is covering up her breasts, your mind will automatically ‘fill in’ the missing bits.

With this in mind, you can use that to your advantage as a photographer: By hiding your model’s dangly, bouncy, or naughty bits, you can sometimes create a photo which is even more allusive and erotic that one where it’s all on display.

Now that's more like it. All it took was to de-saturate the image, fiddle with the contrast a little, and do a tighter crop, which in effect hides all her clothes.

There are a few different situations where this works extremely well. In the past, I have been known to do ‘nude’ sessions with models (especially models who aren’t that experienced), and then taken photos only of their face or head-and-shoulders. Some people relax (or tense up) in a completely unique way when they are not wearing clothes – which gets reflected in their face.

I think I’ve taken some of my best portraits this way – simply because the model was concentrating on making their bodies look good, so they forgot to worry about their face. The result? Beautiful, intimate portraits where you would never have known the model wasn’t wearing clothes.

The opposite is also true, of course: You might well find yourself working with a model who would love to do nudes, but is too shy to actually strip off. Using these techniques, you can create the illusion of nudity.

Showing more by hiding more

You can use implied nudity to create tension in a photograph... She's in a graveyard. Surely, she's not naked. Is she? (clicky for bigger)

We all have different tastes and preferences for what we think is attractive. Combine this with the afore-discussed tendency for people to ‘fill in the blanks’, and you can see what might happen: In a photo where something is hidden, it gives the viewer the opportunity to read as much (or as little) into the scene as they want to.

The great thing is that the viewer tends to ‘fill in’ the blanks with whatever their own fantasies or beauty ideals are, which means that by tapping into the fantasy world of your viewers, you can actually make your model more attractive: After all, your viewers are going to be attracted to whatever their fantasies cook up!

You can't see much (is she wearing a bra? Is she not?) - but it's the implication of nudity which makes this photo. (clicky for bigger)

So – a rather long and picture-heavy post to make a rather simple point: If you haven’t experimented with implying nudity in portraiture before, why not give it a shot – you might like what you come up with!

Show off your work in the comments

I’m not just saying that because I want to ogle apparently naked lads and lasses, honest – I’m curious what you all come up with along these lines!

Take over the world by sharing this post with your worst enemies
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • NewsVine
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • RSS
This post, "Implied nudity in portraiture", is part of these categories: All articles, Become a better photographer, Featured Articles, was posted by Haje Jan Kamps and saw the light of day on the 6th of May 2010. I hope you liked it.

Insights, suggestions and comments

By ImgBy.Me on May 7th, 2010 (permalink)

Hi there! Time for some feedback on this great article (and since pingback doesn’t seem to work). Implied nudity is probably one of the most used techniques in advertisement, so we as photographers should learn how to use this to make better and more appealing pictures.

For an example if dedicated a whole post on my own photoblog about this:
http://www.imgby.me/2010/05/07/implied-nudity/

Not sure if posting images is oke here, so the link will have to do.

By Verster on May 8th, 2010 (permalink)

Great post. It’s definately worth considering for my next shoot.

Thanks for the tip!

By Cynthia McIntyre on June 1st, 2010 (permalink)

Good post! I am a full time professional photographer and would like to begin to offer boudoir photography for my clients. I really had not thought about portraits with “implied” nudity. Very tasteful and would be well received by my female clients.

By Harry Hilders on June 4th, 2010 (permalink)

When you talk about nude, you rarely think about these shots, but they are sexy, though not revealing! I really like it.

By Photography by Pshemek on June 26th, 2010 (permalink)

Very sexy shoots. I think implied nudity in portraiture photography could help to create very nice shoots:)

By avidimages on July 22nd, 2010 (permalink)

I never thought about it, but its great idea – gives shots that teasing intrigue and lets ones imagination wander whats hidden behind the edges of the shot!
Thanks for this article :)

By Adam on July 27th, 2010 (permalink)

Implied is definitely more appealing to clients that fully nude, and probably more sexy.

By Guess the Lighting on August 17th, 2010 (permalink)

Implied is usually more sexy than the actual thing. It let’s the imagination take over: Lighting is also key. If you’re interested in how famous photogs light their images, check out:

GuessTheLighting.com

 

Share your wisdom



Go on, click the button

Do your eyes have the same white balance?
View Results

Photocritic goes ‘Tweet’.

Go on. Join the fun, follow @Photocritic on Twitter!

Get notified!

If you want to get a notification whenever Photocritic makes a new post, fill in the form below!

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox

I love this on Flickr

On the Book of Face

Photocritic on Facebook

My books

Macro Photography Photo Workshop

Macro Photography Photo Workshop by Haje Jan Kamps My day job, if it can be called that, is being a writer. I've got one book out there so far and it's awesome, so go ahead and buy a copy! It's available from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and most decent-sized bookshops, too!

To find out more, check out this post! If you want to know more about the 'being a writer' thing, check this site out.

Put another dime in the jukebox

Put another dime in the jukebox In front of you, five hyperactive men with guitars, drums, and microphones. Behind you, five thousand fans. In your hands, a camera... You're going to need more than just a little bit of good luck to pull this one off. That's where this book comes in.

With nearly a hundred fantastic gig photos, and a ton of info about how to get involved in taking photos like this yourself, you can't go wrong. Buy this book. Grab your camera. Good luck.

Street Photography: London

Street Photography: London Take a Canon EOS 450D. Attach a Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens. Hit the streets of London. See what happens.

Sounds simple - but the results are anything but. Moving, intense, and personal, Street Photography: London is a great collection of the people of London, their passions, and their dreams. Look for yourself!


About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje