<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full photo studio for $77</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toronto Fashion Photographer</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-142477</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Fashion Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-142477</guid>
		<description>Can't see the link,but you always get what you pay for. I have my own studio and it's extremely budget built. I was using ebay and used stuff whenever it was possible.Still,only background stand is $60. Add paper or muslin and it's over $100
And lights...Hot lights are not model friendly. If you are doig fashion photography,god forbid you drop one of those on a model, you'll get sued right away,for serious burns. Not to mention,they run extremely hot. In studio lighting,nothing bellow 200,is even possible.  Plus chinese cheap stuff that you can see being sold on ebay,break within months. You may think you saved some money initially,but you'll loose in the long run.
And how about professional appearance. No client will want to pay you 1000s of $$,if they see duct tape all over the place

Just a thought...

Cheers,
  Dmitri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t see the link,but you always get what you pay for. I have my own studio and it&#8217;s extremely budget built. I was using ebay and used stuff whenever it was possible.Still,only background stand is $60. Add paper or muslin and it&#8217;s over $100<br />
And lights&#8230;Hot lights are not model friendly. If you are doig fashion photography,god forbid you drop one of those on a model, you&#8217;ll get sued right away,for serious burns. Not to mention,they run extremely hot. In studio lighting,nothing bellow 200,is even possible.  Plus chinese cheap stuff that you can see being sold on ebay,break within months. You may think you saved some money initially,but you&#8217;ll loose in the long run.<br />
And how about professional appearance. No client will want to pay you 1000s of $$,if they see duct tape all over the place</p>
<p>Just a thought&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
  Dmitri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-124432</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-124432</guid>
		<description>link no longer exists</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>link no longer exists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-118719</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-118719</guid>
		<description>Please, tell us where it went.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, tell us where it went.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-106714</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-106714</guid>
		<description>God help us Guvnor, its a 404!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God help us Guvnor, its a 404!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan "blackSquirrel" Barber</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-103232</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan "blackSquirrel" Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-103232</guid>
		<description>the link no longer exists, pooh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the link no longer exists, pooh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Foster</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-101675</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-101675</guid>
		<description>The site that this article links to no longer exists :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site that this article links to no longer exists :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Perchick</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Perchick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/full-photo-studio-for-77/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Fantastic article - people often get overawed by the equipment, or spend hundreds or thousands on equipment they don't need, or know how to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic article - people often get overawed by the equipment, or spend hundreds or thousands on equipment they don&#8217;t need, or know how to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
