Comments on: Digital workflow http://photocritic.org/digital-photography-workflow/ The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:44:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Haje Jan Kamps http://photocritic.org/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10852 Haje Jan Kamps Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:31:39 +0000 http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10852 nate: a real computer? We're not Mac-bashing, here, are we? :) nate: a real computer? We’re not Mac-bashing, here, are we? :)

]]> By: Brian White http://photocritic.org/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10625 Brian White Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:43:43 +0000 http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10625 He who laughs last usually made a backup! I have a RAID5 primary system of 4x80GB drives, a USB2.0 external 300GB drive with a script that just moves changed/deleted files to a different directory tree, and a 40GB tape drive I run about twice a year with the tapes stored in a safe deposit box at the bank. Hmmm... I should write that up on my own <a href="http://www.backgroundexposure/blog" rel="nofollow">blog</a>. I actually shoot in <a href="http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/20/my-two-bits/" rel="nofollow">RAW + JPEG</a>. Most of the time I just use the JPEG, but I like to have the RAW file "just in case". He who laughs last usually made a backup!

I have a RAID5 primary system of 4×80GB drives, a USB2.0 external 300GB drive with a script that just moves changed/deleted files to a different directory tree, and a 40GB tape drive I run about twice a year with the tapes stored in a safe deposit box at the bank. Hmmm… I should write that up on my own blog.

I actually shoot in RAW + JPEG. Most of the time I just use the JPEG, but I like to have the RAW file “just in case”.

]]> By: nate http://photocritic.org/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10520 nate Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:14:16 +0000 http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10520 so what do you do if you use a real computer? or god forbid, film? so what do you do if you use a real computer? or god forbid, film?

]]> By: Phil Balchin http://photocritic.org/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10507 Phil Balchin Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:45:58 +0000 http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10507 So you don't use RAW then? Or any special Managment App? I Guess if you've got a system, thats great. For me, i'm pretty new to Photography and i couldn't live without Aperture, now im used to how it does things So you don’t use RAW then? Or any special Managment App? I Guess if you’ve got a system, thats great. For me, i’m pretty new to Photography and i couldn’t live without Aperture, now im used to how it does things

]]> By: Alecu http://photocritic.org/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10440 Alecu Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:37:56 +0000 http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-photography-workflow/#comment-10440 Hey there, I keep the noise reduction and/or the sharpening at last, AFTER resizing. There are a lot of times when after downsizeing there is no more need for noise reduction and a lot of times when downsizeing causes softening, so sharpening before that is useless. Further more, on the files that go to the photolab I do no noise reduction at all, coz' the noisiest file will look great on paper (if it's printed on a printer it's another story) :P Hey there,
I keep the noise reduction and/or the sharpening at last, AFTER resizing.
There are a lot of times when after downsizeing there is no more need for noise reduction and a lot of times when downsizeing causes softening, so sharpening before that is useless.
Further more, on the files that go to the photolab I do no noise reduction at all, coz’ the noisiest file will look great on paper (if it’s printed on a printer it’s another story) :P

]]>