Photocritic prefers the shade to direct sunlight.

Digital workflow

previous article: next article:

workflow.jpgSo, I have a shitload of photos. I don’t know how many, actually, but there are a fair few – about 35 thousand, i reckon. And somehow, I manage to keep them organised. Mostly.

I’m a strong believer in finding your own way of working, and my system isn’t without flaws, but if you can draw any experience or help from any of this – all the better!

picsinfo.jpgWhen I get home from a shoot, I download the pictures from my memory card(s) using an USB2 card-reader. It is fast, and Image Capture that comes with OS X does a good job of it. I download everything to the same folder (called “Temp Images”) on my Desktop.

Once they are there, I make a new folder – or more, if I’ve done several jobs since the last time i’ve copied stuff over from my memory card – and then I move the files to their relevant folders, aided by the thumbnail images that Image Capture puts on the Finder icons for the photographs. For this purpose, I have my Finder icons set to the largest (128×128 px).

The next step is running NoiseNinja on the photos. Noise Ninja removes a large portion of the noise that is inherent in the CMOS memory chips in my cameras, and I’ve spent a considerable amount of time making sure that the calibration is correct. It automatically picks a noise profile based on the ISO values and shutter speeds (I have 32 different profiles – one for each of the ISO values I use (100-3200) and one for the major shutter speeds (250 / 60 / 15 / 1 second / 3 seconds) that I use.

The batch processing I use in Noise Ninja also automatically copies the files to a new folder (called “edit”), so the original files remain untouched – just in case I need them later.

I then run the batch processed files through Pic2Icon, as the processing strips their finder icons off, and I actually quite like finder icons ;)

The next step is Adobe Photoshop editing, which is all pretty straight-forward: Levels and curves for contrast, airbrushing, and finally some Unsharp mask (see my article on USM for more info than you ever wanted) to sharpen the image.

Once the photographs are edited, they are saved in low-compression JPEGs. When I work with portraiture and other aspects where colour is vital, I work in RAW, which changes the workflow ever so slightly, but not by much.

Droplets

Picture-1~0.jpgNow the photos are edited, but they will need further editing doing to them, usually. This normally comes in the shape of resizing for e-mailing or posting on the web. For this, I often use ImageReady:

The descriptions speak for themselves, really. From top left:

  • Resizes the file to longest length 500, and adds a copyright bar
  • Converts the image to Alamy-standard TIFF files
  • Rotates the image counter-clockwise (never really use this anymore, as all the cameras I currently use have an orientation-sensor built in
  • Resizes the file to longest length 2000 (good for e-mailing images that will be used in lower resolution to magazines)
    800×650 resizes the image to 800 px across or 650 vertically – whatever is less. this is my standard web / e-mailing size, as it is a good trade-off between size and resolution. The 800×650 means that it can be displayed fully on most computer screens (as most people run far higher resolutions nowadays)
  • Optimize merely re-processes the JPG, compresses it to 60% and strips its Finder icon off. this is useful before e-mailing previews
  • Portfolio images is the script that saves images in two different sizes in two different folders for use in the Photocritic Portfolio section.

The last two should be pretty obvious ;)

I have a load of other droplets as well, but these are the most frequently used ones (hence them being on my desktop) The other droplets are usually needed when sending files to particular customers (who want particular colour profiles, or who want specified file sizes etc)

File organisation

I save it all in a structure as follows:

Picture-2~1.jpg

Basically, I have one folder called “_BU” which stands for “backed up”. The “_NBU” is, of course, “not backed up”. This is an archaic naming system that I used when I was still backing up stuff to DVDs (I still do, but that is for a different section). now this only means “Have I considered the photos for submission to Alamy or not?”. if they are in _BU, they have been considered (and submitted). if they are not, they are not.

_BU contains a series of categories, which make it a lot easier to find what I need, as most shoots fall pretty cleanly in one of those categories. Pretty self-explanatory, really.

Within each of the categories, I have all my photos in groups in different folders. Within the folders, I normally have:

  • Originals
  • Edited (u)
  • Edited (s)
  • Edited (w)
  • Edited (ps)

The first one is self-explanatory. The others are unsharpened, sharpened, web, and photoshop. unsharpened files are useful to keep around for when I am not sure what the images will be used for. The sharpened files are sharpened for magazine and print use. The web folder is basically the same as the unsharpened folder, but processed through the 800×650 droplet mentioned above. now that I have a fast computer, I tend not to bother with the web sized anymore, but when I was still on a slow computer, it saved me a lot of time to keep low-res versions around, to quickly be able to find a particular photo.

Backup routines

Every day (at 3 in the morning), my entire pictures folder is automatically backed up to an external 250GB Firewire drive. This ensures that I won’t be the victim, in case my internal 250GB SATA data drive (my OS, software, etc is on an 80GB SATA drive) decides to snuff it.

Once every other week (or more often, if I am nervous after a large shoot), I copy the entire contents of the external drive (called Alpha) onto another external FW drive (Beta, also 250GB), which I keep hidden somewhere in my apartment. That way, if someone breaks in and robs my stuff, my photos should still be reasonably safe – presuming that my house alarm scares them away before they start searching for my backup drive)

Every once in a blue moon (too rarely, I know, but it takes a lot of time) I write the entire contents of the external drive to DVDs. At 4.7 GB a pop, that means a nice fat stack of DVDs. These DVDs are shipped off to my parents, who safe-keep all the sets of backups for me. They live on the other side of the world (Trinidad, currently), so the off-site backup requirement is covered, I’d say.

A few thoughts on improvements

Obviously, this system works perfectly for me. But I fear the day that someone else has to make sense of it. And I fear that day is going to come sooner, rather than later. I have a lot of work on, and am looking at hiring someone to work for me soonish.

There are great solutions out there (FotoWare FotoStation is a great example), but most of them are costly, and it requires specific servers to keep the solution running properly.

For now, this system works well for me, but we’ll see what I’ll do in the future. I am more than open to suggestions to improvements!

Money made from this advert will be invested in prime lenses.
This post, "Digital workflow", is part of these categories: All articles, was posted by Haje Jan Kamps and saw the light of day on the 21st of November 2006. I hope you liked it.

Insights, suggestions and comments

By Alecu on November 21st, 2006 (permalink)

Hey there,
I keep the noise reduction and/or the sharpening at last, AFTER resizing.
There are a lot of times when after downsizeing there is no more need for noise reduction and a lot of times when downsizeing causes softening, so sharpening before that is useless.
Further more, on the files that go to the photolab I do no noise reduction at all, coz’ the noisiest file will look great on paper (if it’s printed on a printer it’s another story) :P

By Phil Balchin on November 21st, 2006 (permalink)

So you don’t use RAW then? Or any special Managment App? I Guess if you’ve got a system, thats great. For me, i’m pretty new to Photography and i couldn’t live without Aperture, now im used to how it does things

By nate on November 21st, 2006 (permalink)

so what do you do if you use a real computer? or god forbid, film?

By Brian White on November 22nd, 2006 (permalink)

He who laughs last usually made a backup!

I have a RAID5 primary system of 4×80GB drives, a USB2.0 external 300GB drive with a script that just moves changed/deleted files to a different directory tree, and a 40GB tape drive I run about twice a year with the tapes stored in a safe deposit box at the bank. Hmmm… I should write that up on my own blog.

I actually shoot in RAW + JPEG. Most of the time I just use the JPEG, but I like to have the RAW file “just in case”.

By Haje Jan Kamps on November 24th, 2006 (permalink)

nate: a real computer? We’re not Mac-bashing, here, are we? :)

 

Share your wisdom



Go on, click the button

So, the 550D and the 50D cost practically the same, and have different advantages. Which one would you buy?
View Results

Get notified!

If you want to get a notification whenever Photocritic makes a new post, fill in the form below!

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox

I love this on Flickr

On the Book of Face

Photocritic on Facebook

It goes 'tweet'

  • • @nordhagen actually, that *is* our recycling bin - it's all taken away, sorted, and recycled ;) (link)
  • • 1,000 fans on #Facebook. Thank you, everybody! http://www.facebook.com/photocritic (link)
  • • Waterfall? I spit on your waterfal. Here, have a lava waterfall http://flic.kr/p/7FH8z3 (or: Why the Golden Hour can be so bloody amazing) (link)
  • • Canon EOS 550D or 50D - which one would you choose? Read more, vote and discuss: http://ow.ly/1k7Us #Photog #Tog (link)
  • • The sign of a good party... http://yfrog.com/1ny72j (link)
  • • My Canon EOS 450D is still on eBay. Auction is finished within 5 hours, grab a bargain: http://is.gd/9PLs5 (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My books

Macro Photography Photo Workshop

Macro Photography Photo Workshop by Haje Jan Kamps My day job, if it can be called that, is being a writer. I've got one book out there so far and it's awesome, so go ahead and buy a copy! It's available from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and most decent-sized bookshops, too!

To find out more, check out this post! If you want to know more about the 'being a writer' thing, check this site out.

Put another dime in the jukebox

Put another dime in the jukebox In front of you, five hyperactive men with guitars, drums, and microphones. Behind you, five thousand fans. In your hands, a camera... You're going to need more than just a little bit of good luck to pull this one off. That's where this book comes in.

With nearly a hundred fantastic gig photos, and a ton of info about how to get involved in taking photos like this yourself, you can't go wrong. Buy this book. Grab your camera. Good luck.

Street Photography: London

Street Photography: London Take a Canon EOS 450D. Attach a Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens. Hit the streets of London. See what happens.

Sounds simple - but the results are anything but. Moving, intense, and personal, Street Photography: London is a great collection of the people of London, their passions, and their dreams. Look for yourself!


About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje