<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing a digital compact camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-110639</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-110639</guid>
		<description>Stunning post. I only wish I could have written it myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunning post. I only wish I could have written it myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Thomas</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-31759</link>
		<dc:creator>B Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-31759</guid>
		<description>Though panasonic is primarly an electronic company they seem to have a collaboration with Leica. Many panasonic digital cameras are almost identical to their more expensive Leica counterparts. Furter the lenses of most panasonic cameras are made by leica. I would consider panasonic especially in the prosumer category given these facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though panasonic is primarly an electronic company they seem to have a collaboration with Leica. Many panasonic digital cameras are almost identical to their more expensive Leica counterparts. Furter the lenses of most panasonic cameras are made by leica. I would consider panasonic especially in the prosumer category given these facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Overall I agree, however Leica&#039;s digital compacts are made by Panasonic so why trust one and not the other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall I agree, however Leica&#8217;s digital compacts are made by Panasonic so why trust one and not the other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-412</guid>
		<description>I believe Konica Minolta have recently left the camera business, and Sony are handling their warranties and service. So maybe they should be off the list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Konica Minolta have recently left the camera business, and Sony are handling their warranties and service. So maybe they should be off the list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Awesome, thanks for the linkage. Glad you found my blog post useful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, thanks for the linkage. Glad you found my blog post useful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Good advice in general, and I heartily second your distaste for cameras by companies that specialize in something else, like hp or Casio. But a small nitpick: Agfa was making cameras &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/AgfaIsolette.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;back in the 50&#039;s. I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d consider them a newcomer to the camera market. Of course, with that said, I agree that I wouldn&#039;t feel as confident about one of their cameras over something from Canon, Nikon, etc.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice in general, and I heartily second your distaste for cameras by companies that specialize in something else, like hp or Casio. But a small nitpick: Agfa was making cameras <a href="http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/AgfaIsolette.html" rel="nofollow">back in the 50&#8217;s. I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d consider them a newcomer to the camera market. Of course, with that said, I agree that I wouldn&#8217;t feel as confident about one of their cameras over something from Canon, Nikon, etc.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>in terms of people first starting out with digital photography, I tend to send them directly to DPReview&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Features Search&lt;/a&gt;.  I  think it&#039;s also worth emphasizing the fact that people should consider what they&#039;d like to use the camera for before buying one.  For example, the Macro (flower) feature is common but not standard and a person interested in macro photography might feel disappointed after realizing that their camera lacks this functionality.

In defense of companies like Sony and Panasonic (though I have no real reason to go to bat for either of them), strategic partnerships demonstrate that they know they don&#039;t have all the solutions. For example, Panasonic&#039;s deal with Leica lenses and Sony with Carl Zeiss. Similarly, Sony and Minolta will be working on DSLRs as a team.  Results should be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in terms of people first starting out with digital photography, I tend to send them directly to DPReview&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare.asp" rel="nofollow">Features Search</a>.  I  think it&#8217;s also worth emphasizing the fact that people should consider what they&#8217;d like to use the camera for before buying one.  For example, the Macro (flower) feature is common but not standard and a person interested in macro photography might feel disappointed after realizing that their camera lacks this functionality.</p>
<p>In defense of companies like Sony and Panasonic (though I have no real reason to go to bat for either of them), strategic partnerships demonstrate that they know they don&#8217;t have all the solutions. For example, Panasonic&#8217;s deal with Leica lenses and Sony with Carl Zeiss. Similarly, Sony and Minolta will be working on DSLRs as a team.  Results should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adi</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/digital-camera-choice/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>adi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 02:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/digital-camera-choice/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to point out that your inclusion of Leica&#039;s digital cameras is an implicit inclusion of Panasonic, who manufactures them.  Same deal with Sony and Konica/Minolta, after last month.

Though I agree that the Sony Memsticck is a piece of rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to point out that your inclusion of Leica&#8217;s digital cameras is an implicit inclusion of Panasonic, who manufactures them.  Same deal with Sony and Konica/Minolta, after last month.</p>
<p>Though I agree that the Sony Memsticck is a piece of rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
