Choosing a digital compact camera

Posted by Haje Jan Kamps

Picture-14.jpgAs someone who occasionally dabbles in photography, I am frequently asked “I have £XXX to spend, and want to buy a digital camera. What should I buy?”. It’s a difficult question, especially because I’ve been known to spend high sums of money on digital photographic equipment, and I haven’t actually kept myself up to date with what’s stirring in the world of digital.

I am able to offer a few pointers, of course…

$ earned from this advert will be invested in beer

Throughout the years, I’ve owned a series of different cameras - a Casio QV-2000 got me started, before I graduated to a Kodak DC-4800, a Canon Powershot Pro 90 IS. From there on I bought my first digital SLR, but kept a Canon A300 (the cheapest Canon compact available at the time), and later an Olympus C1 and currently a Canon S500 (Digital Elph / Ixus) as backup / pocket cameras. These are just the cameras I’ve personally owned - in addition I’ve tested dozens of cameras, mostly from back in the day when I was the editor of Digitalkamera.no, but also from playing around with scores of other cameras.

Lessons I have learned from playing around with all of these cameras are many and varied, but the main ones are quite similar to the tips Andy offers in Choosing a digital compact camera over on his Lost Outpost blog…

Tips to buying a digital camera

1) Find out how much you wish to spend
2) Pick a brand you like (see below for more on this)
3) Find the digital compact camera whose price tag is closest to the figure decided in #1, built by the brand decided in #2
4) Read the review of the camera chosen in #3 on Digital Photo Review
5) Use Froogle or other price comparison sites to find the cheapest place to buy the camera.

See how easy that was?

Choosing a decent camera brand

As you can probably tell from the list of cameras I’ve owned, I’m a bit of a Canon-head myself, but I would never recommend against buying a Nikon - or, in fact, any other digital camera from a camera manufacturer.

This is important, however: Camera manufacturer. That means that the following manufacturers are likely to build excellent digital cameras that I could warmly recommend:

  • Canon
  • Contax
  • Konica Minolta
  • Leica
  • Nikon
  • Olympus
  • Pentax

Notice something? Well, a lot of big digital camera manufacturers are missing from that list. This is with good reason, however: Personally, I find it difficult to trust people who make digital cameras “on the side” - why buy an Agfa, Casio or Hewlett Packard camera, when you can buy a Canon or a Nikon for similar prices - and the latter two actually have a reputation and the vast experience needed to build good cameras?

Most controversially, Sony, Toshiba and Panasonic are missing off the above list. Why? Basically, they are general electronics manufacturers, and I don’t trust them to build cameras that are up to a standard I’d be happy with at a price I’d be willing to pay for them: If you can afford one of these, you can also afford one of the ones in the list above, and that would be a safer bet. Besides, as Andy mentions in his article above, the Sony Memory stick system is icky, proprietary lark, while we have perfectly usable compact flash, SD, and other memory card systems around that could be used instead.

There are no bad cameras anymore…

The most important thing to realise is that most digital cameras are now good. As long as you pick a decent brand, there are no truly bad digital compacts out there anymore (unlike, say, 1998, when I bought my first digital compact), so a choice you make will never be a completely horrendous choice. Especially as you are starting out, you are unlikely to know the difference anyway - and you are certainly going to pick up a lot of tricks along the way, which will help you make a more educated choice for your next camera. And the one after that…

Good luck!

Did you like this post? Stay in touch!

If you liked this post, why not stay in touch with Photocritic going forward?

I'm on Flickr and Twitter, or you could add my RSS feed to your favourite feed reader. Or, if you don't fancy doing any of that, drop us a comment below; you can be anonymous if you want to, but if you add a link to your blog or similar, I'll promise I'll come have a look!

Money made from this advert will be invested in beer.
Posted in: All articles • 22 Apr '06

Insights, suggestions and comments

By adi on April 22nd, 2006 (permalink)

I just wanted to point out that your inclusion of Leica’s digital cameras is an implicit inclusion of Panasonic, who manufactures them. Same deal with Sony and Konica/Minolta, after last month.

Though I agree that the Sony Memsticck is a piece of rubbish.

By Paul on April 22nd, 2006 (permalink)

in terms of people first starting out with digital photography, I tend to send them directly to DPReview’s Features Search. I think it’s also worth emphasizing the fact that people should consider what they’d like to use the camera for before buying one. For example, the Macro (flower) feature is common but not standard and a person interested in macro photography might feel disappointed after realizing that their camera lacks this functionality.

In defense of companies like Sony and Panasonic (though I have no real reason to go to bat for either of them), strategic partnerships demonstrate that they know they don’t have all the solutions. For example, Panasonic’s deal with Leica lenses and Sony with Carl Zeiss. Similarly, Sony and Minolta will be working on DSLRs as a team. Results should be interesting.

By Dan on April 22nd, 2006 (permalink)

Good advice in general, and I heartily second your distaste for cameras by companies that specialize in something else, like hp or Casio. But a small nitpick: Agfa was making cameras back in the 50’s. I don’t know that I’d consider them a newcomer to the camera market. Of course, with that said, I agree that I wouldn’t feel as confident about one of their cameras over something from Canon, Nikon, etc.

By Andy on April 22nd, 2006 (permalink)

Awesome, thanks for the linkage. Glad you found my blog post useful!

By Stu on April 23rd, 2006 (permalink)

I believe Konica Minolta have recently left the camera business, and Sony are handling their warranties and service. So maybe they should be off the list?

By Ronald on April 24th, 2006 (permalink)

Overall I agree, however Leica’s digital compacts are made by Panasonic so why trust one and not the other?

By B Thomas on January 23rd, 2007 (permalink)

Though panasonic is primarly an electronic company they seem to have a collaboration with Leica. Many panasonic digital cameras are almost identical to their more expensive Leica counterparts. Furter the lenses of most panasonic cameras are made by leica. I would consider panasonic especially in the prosumer category given these facts.

By Charlotte on July 7th, 2007 (permalink)

Stunning post. I only wish I could have written it myself.

 

Share your wisdom



Current Poll

By the end of the month, will you own an iPhone?
View Results

My recent Flickr favourites

Sweet as sin and black as hell©ashley suzanne taylorWalt Disney Concert Hall 2Caressed by the Sun IIIPale LifeBorage flower"Between the lights and the shadows, a woman sits"End of Day (II)Midsummer!Hair Trim (87/365)Rocas ValleThe Netherlands, insidePaint the town Pink.Have a good day!DSC_4102Bending The Laws of Gravity
See all my Flickr favourites here

My recent Flickr uploads

near Swingate, ENG, United KingdomWarmenhuizen, North Holland, NetherlandsKorrewegwijk, Groningen, Netherlandsnear Ladegårdshuse, Roskilde, Denmarknear Hornstrup, Vejle, DenmarkVejleHolmenkollen, Oslo, NorwayRogaland reflected in an Arai
See my Flickr galleries here

Photocritic on Twitter...

  • Jul 5 tweet: 58 crazy-good photography tutorials has lots of good tips (and features one of mine at #40 :) http://is.gd/1nPHc (link)
  • Jul 5 tweet: Awesome photograph by the lovley @phototropy; Sweet as sin and black as hell http://is.gd/1nyDp (link)
  • Jul 3 tweet: http://bit.ly/v7PfR was nominated to become a Twitter tee - feel free to vote it down if you think it's lame! :) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: "We shot 50,000 pix, printed 8,000 of them and shot another 1,800 pictures" - http://is.gd/1lTrX (YouTube video / stop motion animation) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: I failed to notice that I now have over 3,000 followers! I'll do my best not to disappoint, stay tuned for Photocritic updates soon. (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: The Human Printer 'prints' photographs in CMYK using felt-tip markers. Bonkers, but very cool: http://is.gd/1li3D (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My book

macrocover.jpg
... is now available from »Amazon.com and »Amazon.co.uk, too!

About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje