Photocritic loves taking good photos with his iPhone

Sharpening photos in the darkroom

In the past, we’ve covered why it is important to sharpen your photos, and how you can use the Unsharp Mask tool in Photoshop to make sure your photos look their best.

I am a firm believer of understanding how things are done manually, however. If you are to take shortcuts, you have to know the long road to get there first. So… If you have a darkroom, how can you sharpen your images without letting the film go anywhere near a computer?

Here’s how…

In the old days, limited film and lens quality kept the sharpness away from photography. When the negative techniques started evolving, and lenses and film became the bottlenecks, people started to experiment with ways to improve the image in various ways. Contrast became one of the first improvements, but this was comparatively easy to correct in the darkroom. Now sharpness was a different thing altogether.

The first cameras used horribly show shutter times; This increases the chance of camera and/or subject movement. Slight focussing problems also frequently occurred. Remember that a regular 24 x 36 mm negative is enlarged significantly, and even the tiniest blurriness becomes visual: Which is why some bright soul came up with a way to sharpen the final results.

How to…

If you want to have a go at using unsharp masking in the darkroom (heh – if you want to put yourself through stuff like that, let me tell you; I like you), here is a concise guide how it can be done. I have had a lot of surprises when using this technique – mostly positive surprises, but every now and then, things go very wrong. Even then, it looks interesting, if nothing else.

Right. Take the negative you want to have sharpened, and place it on a photographical-grade glass plate. Underneath the glass plate, put some unexposed film. Now, make a contact copy of the film, and develop the film from under the glass plate. That should leave you with a positive copy of your negative. This copy will be ever so slightly blurred (because of the glass plate), which is exactly what you want. Align the two film strips, and put them both in your enlarger.

Right – let’s have a look what has happened now. Theoretically – if the contact copy was 100% exact, you shouldn’t be able to see through your negative. Why? Well – what was light in your original negative should now be dark in your positive (effectively a slide), and all the gradations should be cancelling each other out. However, you don’t have (and didn’t want) an exact copy – you need the small differences. When turning on your enlarger, you will see a strange outline of your image.

This outline consists of the original highlights (which were black in your negative – cause it’s a negative, remember?), and the blur is introduced into the transitions in the shadows of the image. What this means? Well – your shadows will ‘take more space’ in the image, and eat into the blurred edges of your original negative.

So – what you’ll want to do is to just briefly flash this unsharp mask on your photographic paper, and then expose the paper normally, using only the negative.

You should be able to tell the difference between pictures that have / have not had this done to them.

So how long should you flash the enlarger? I wish I could tell you. I have spent endless days in darkrooms, and eventually it becomes second nature. You can tell approximately how much exposure a particular unsharped image needs – just keep practising, and bracket all your tries (yes – half step bracket your unsharp masked image, and then see what works best. Take notes to find out exactly how you can make it all come toghether perfectly.)

Good luck!

Money made from this advert will be invested in prime lenses.
This post, "Sharpening photos in the darkroom", is part of these categories: All articles, Become a better photographer, Equipment, Featured Articles, Most Popular, was posted by Haje Jan Kamps and saw the light of day on the 18th of April 2008. I hope you liked it.

Insights, suggestions and comments

By Sadegh on April 18th, 2008 (permalink)

Hi.

Thanks for the article(s). ;)
We have a website containing professional articles about photography: http://www.akkasee.com
Yes, it’s persian, and can I use (translate) some of your articles, of course with your name?

By Udi Tirosh on May 11th, 2008 (permalink)

Great post Haje,
It it always nice to know what they did in the pre PS days.
Do you have any pictures of the process to share?
- udi

By Kent on May 28th, 2008 (permalink)

I used to do color separations on 16X20 sheet film. I used a film made for the purpose, Kodak 4570 Pan Masking Film. It was different in that it had no anti-halation coating. (There is a dark coating on the back of most film to keep light from reflecting back up through the sensitive layers after it has come through them. It would create halos around points of light.)
The film was exposed through the base, with the emulsion on the bottom with one or two exposures through color filters. Then in the next step it was placed on a sheet of separation film in the same position using register pins, and the separation film was exposed through a color filter.
It is called unsharp masking because it would sound wrong to call it blurry or dull.
The masking film was used mainly for color correction for the four color process. The printing process used for color uses 4 inks, cyan, magenta, yellow, and black. The 3 colors are not perfect, and they act like there is a some mixture of the other colors in them. for example, the yellow should absorb only blue light, but it absorbs a small amount of green light, like it was mixed with some magenta ink. So the mask is made with a green filter. That makes the final yellow film lighter in areas where there is magenta ink.
This is more than you ever wanted to know about stone-age color reproduction, but once I got started thinking about it I just had to explain.

By artman on May 31st, 2008 (permalink)

great post:)

By sean on October 30th, 2009 (permalink)

Highpass is a better way to sharpen than unsharp mask… or so I found out this week in class.

:)

By hamid on January 30th, 2010 (permalink)

Hi.

Thanks for the article(s). ;)
We have a website containing professional articles about photography: http://www.chilick.com
Yes, it’s persian, and can I use (translate) some of your articles, of course with your name?

Trackbacks

 

Share your wisdom



Go on, click the button

I take photos in...
View Results

Get notified!

If you want to get a notification whenever Photocritic makes a new post, fill in the form below!

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox

I love this on Flickr

On the Book of Face

Photocritic on Facebook

It goes 'tweet'

  • • Frightfully sorry, sir, we can't remember where we buried your winter clothes. http://yfrog.com/358tzqj (link)
  • • Red Pandas sharing a drink http://bit.ly/bC6VJV (awww!!) via @ohiohoya (link)
  • • Hey @theprintspace you're just down the road from me - fancy doing an interview some time, for Photocritic.org? Mail me - h@kamps.org (link)
  • • Official pics of the Canon EOS 550D - http://is.gd/7Ylks #Photog (link)
  • • Macro photography is good fun. As is smoke photography. Combining the two is photographic torture... with lovely results: http://is.gd/7YjVY (link)
  • • RT @warandpeace: @Photocritic You appear to be on engadget! http://bit.ly/dgp8qn (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My books

Macro Photography Photo Workshop

Macro Photography Photo Workshop by Haje Jan Kamps My day job, if it can be called that, is being a writer. I've got one book out there so far and it's awesome, so go ahead and buy a copy! It's available from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and most decent-sized bookshops, too!

To find out more, check out this post! If you want to know more about the 'being a writer' thing, check this site out.

Put another dime in the jukebox

Put another dime in the jukebox In front of you, five hyperactive men with guitars, drums, and microphones. Behind you, five thousand fans. In your hands, a camera... You're going to need more than just a little bit of good luck to pull this one off. That's where this book comes in.

With nearly a hundred fantastic gig photos, and a ton of info about how to get involved in taking photos like this yourself, you can't go wrong. Buy this book. Grab your camera. Good luck.

Street Photography: London

Street Photography: London Take a Canon EOS 450D. Attach a Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens. Hit the streets of London. See what happens.

Sounds simple - but the results are anything but. Moving, intense, and personal, Street Photography: London is a great collection of the people of London, their passions, and their dreams. Look for yourself!


About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje