<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photographing dancers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-314271</link>
		<dc:creator>henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-314271</guid>
		<description>Fantastic pictures. Will keep visiting this blog. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic pictures. Will keep visiting this blog. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-314270</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-314270</guid>
		<description>When to the Royal Opera House this week. Was so lucky to get to see back stage. They have some beautiful photographs of the ballet. Worth taking a look if you can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When to the Royal Opera House this week. Was so lucky to get to see back stage. They have some beautiful photographs of the ballet. Worth taking a look if you can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wang Kuang Ming</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-314086</link>
		<dc:creator>Wang Kuang Ming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-314086</guid>
		<description>great pictures.. awesome article.. thanks.. i learn a lot from this blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great pictures.. awesome article.. thanks.. i learn a lot from this blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael roud</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-309597</link>
		<dc:creator>michael roud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 06:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-309597</guid>
		<description>It was a great article.  I always think that it is important to make sure that you are using a high shutter speed when photographing dancers.  That means your shutter should be over 1/120 of a second at the least.  Also, a long lens will increase chances of blurring as well.

Make sure that you are using a high speed lens.  My website, www.michaelroud.com has a lot of information on this type of photography.  My website also specializes in actor headshots in los angeeles california.  Actor headshots is extremely important and involves many of the same techniques as shooting dancers.  Lighting is important, as is shutter speed when the actor is moving from one pose to the next.  Many professional phtoographers in los angeles ca under-rate this one aspect.  My video www.actor-headshots-losangeles.com also exhibits these principles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a great article.  I always think that it is important to make sure that you are using a high shutter speed when photographing dancers.  That means your shutter should be over 1/120 of a second at the least.  Also, a long lens will increase chances of blurring as well.</p>
<p>Make sure that you are using a high speed lens.  My website, <a href="http://www.michaelroud.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelroud.com</a> has a lot of information on this type of photography.  My website also specializes in actor headshots in los angeeles california.  Actor headshots is extremely important and involves many of the same techniques as shooting dancers.  Lighting is important, as is shutter speed when the actor is moving from one pose to the next.  Many professional phtoographers in los angeles ca under-rate this one aspect.  My video <a href="http://www.actor-headshots-losangeles.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.actor-headshots-losangeles.com</a> also exhibits these principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-302541</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-302541</guid>
		<description>Great post. Enjoyed the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Enjoyed the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivy</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-301272</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-301272</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I shot in December ;)
http://ivapelcova.com/index.php?showimage=139&amp;category=3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I shot in December ;)<br />
<a href="http://ivapelcova.com/index.php?showimage=139&amp;category=3" rel="nofollow">http://ivapelcova.com/index.php?showimage=139&amp;category=3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-301046</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-301046</guid>
		<description>&quot;You are just not going to get really good photos with anything less than a semi-professional DSLR...More than anything else you can spend your money on, no lag, and instant AF will improve your pictures.&quot;

A very concise run through many of the nuiances of dance photography, particularly applied to dancesport. However I disagree with the above quoted statement. 

The crucial factor is a photographer who anticipates. Knowing the dance is essential - either as a dancer, or to have attended rehearsals and to note when best a photo opportunity will arise.

An entry level DSLR will have minimal lag, which is alright. Continuous shooting is less an issue because if you time the shot well, you only need 1 capture. A great way to practice timing for action (be it sport or dance) is to sit in front of a television and watch recordings, and with a camera to hand, take screenshots of the action.

However returning to equipment, what does matter (and Laurie correctly identifies) are lens choices, of which fast glass is paramount. If you don&#039;t have fast glass available, then a strobe can help. 

Laurie will be familiar with my photography (website is linked with examples). I use fast glass stopped down to f/5.6 to gather a bit more depth of field - it&#039;s easy to capture one partner in focus and the other out at f/2.8 or less. To compensate for this I&#039;m not afraid of using a high ISO value.

There are many other technical aspects that I could go into, but that in itself could be a whole article - AF modes, knowing your lighting (which includes reflective surfaces, colour casts, gelling strobes, direction of light source, controlling shadows/highlights), nailing WB...

I should note that this is me being critical, drawing from my years of dancesport photography, but as a starting point, a really great effort Laurie, and I wish I had this sort of knowledge at the first dance competition I went to.

--
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You are just not going to get really good photos with anything less than a semi-professional DSLR&#8230;More than anything else you can spend your money on, no lag, and instant AF will improve your pictures.&#8221;</p>
<p>A very concise run through many of the nuiances of dance photography, particularly applied to dancesport. However I disagree with the above quoted statement. </p>
<p>The crucial factor is a photographer who anticipates. Knowing the dance is essential &#8211; either as a dancer, or to have attended rehearsals and to note when best a photo opportunity will arise.</p>
<p>An entry level DSLR will have minimal lag, which is alright. Continuous shooting is less an issue because if you time the shot well, you only need 1 capture. A great way to practice timing for action (be it sport or dance) is to sit in front of a television and watch recordings, and with a camera to hand, take screenshots of the action.</p>
<p>However returning to equipment, what does matter (and Laurie correctly identifies) are lens choices, of which fast glass is paramount. If you don&#8217;t have fast glass available, then a strobe can help. </p>
<p>Laurie will be familiar with my photography (website is linked with examples). I use fast glass stopped down to f/5.6 to gather a bit more depth of field &#8211; it&#8217;s easy to capture one partner in focus and the other out at f/2.8 or less. To compensate for this I&#8217;m not afraid of using a high ISO value.</p>
<p>There are many other technical aspects that I could go into, but that in itself could be a whole article &#8211; AF modes, knowing your lighting (which includes reflective surfaces, colour casts, gelling strobes, direction of light source, controlling shadows/highlights), nailing WB&#8230;</p>
<p>I should note that this is me being critical, drawing from my years of dancesport photography, but as a starting point, a really great effort Laurie, and I wish I had this sort of knowledge at the first dance competition I went to.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmt</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-300861</link>
		<dc:creator>tmt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-300861</guid>
		<description>Maybe not so amazing, but here they are:

http://picasaweb.google.com/hajma.miklos/Maffia#

These were shot with a Pentax k200d with a 80-200mm f/2.8 Tokina, and some with a 50mm f/1.7 Chinon (these are manual lenses). I was using them mostly around f/4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not so amazing, but here they are:</p>
<p><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/hajma.miklos/Maffia#" rel="nofollow">http://picasaweb.google.com/hajma.miklos/Maffia#</a></p>
<p>These were shot with a Pentax k200d with a 80-200mm f/2.8 Tokina, and some with a 50mm f/1.7 Chinon (these are manual lenses). I was using them mostly around f/4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haje Jan Kamps</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-300849</link>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-300849</guid>
		<description>Hi TMT!

Thanks for your additional tips - if you have any amazing examples of your own dance photography, don&#039;t be shy about posting a few links as a comment here, I&#039;d love to take a look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi TMT!</p>
<p>Thanks for your additional tips &#8211; if you have any amazing examples of your own dance photography, don&#8217;t be shy about posting a few links as a comment here, I&#8217;d love to take a look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmt</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-300848</link>
		<dc:creator>tmt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-300848</guid>
		<description>I can just agree about the technical side, you need a fast lens to do dance photography.

In addition, there is another side of dance photography, is to capture stage dancing. This is easier, when you shoot in a well equipped theatre (lighting can be far better), and harder, because that is less predictable, if you don&#039;t able to see the coreographies more than once.

But for the dancing, it helps me a lot being a dancer myself. Think musically at first, as poses, accents will be happen always at certain points of music. If you concentrate on the flow of the music, you can get really good shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can just agree about the technical side, you need a fast lens to do dance photography.</p>
<p>In addition, there is another side of dance photography, is to capture stage dancing. This is easier, when you shoot in a well equipped theatre (lighting can be far better), and harder, because that is less predictable, if you don&#8217;t able to see the coreographies more than once.</p>
<p>But for the dancing, it helps me a lot being a dancer myself. Think musically at first, as poses, accents will be happen always at certain points of music. If you concentrate on the flow of the music, you can get really good shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/dance-photography/#comment-300813</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocritic.org/?p=1813#comment-300813</guid>
		<description>The panning photo and the one that follows it are awesome (kudos to Laurie!). More like painting than regular photos. 
Great results, thanks for sharing the info and the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The panning photo and the one that follows it are awesome (kudos to Laurie!). More like painting than regular photos.<br />
Great results, thanks for sharing the info and the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
