<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keep your compact zoomed out!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photocritic.org/compact-camera-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photocritic.org/compact-camera-tips/</link>
	<description>The Photocritic DIY photography projects blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Haje Jan Kamps</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/compact-camera-tips/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/compact-camera-tips/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Evin: Very good point. Personally, I only photograph for the web nowadays, so I hardly ever need the resolution. 

It doesn&#039;t quite change the fact that &quot;if the picture ain&#039;t good enough, you ain&#039;t close enough&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evin: Very good point. Personally, I only photograph for the web nowadays, so I hardly ever need the resolution. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t quite change the fact that &#8220;if the picture ain&#8217;t good enough, you ain&#8217;t close enough&#8221; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evin</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/compact-camera-tips/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>evin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/compact-camera-tips/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Is it really better to crop than zoom on a 3x zoom with about 1.6 stops of light loss?  When zoomed out all the way, you get 3 times as much light, but you&#039;re only interested in the middle of the picture (1/9th of the frame), so you end up with about a third as much light being used.

Do an experiment: take the picture zoomed out all the way, at ISO 100.  Take the same picture zoomed in all the way, at ISO 400 (to more than compensate for the light loss).  Crop and enlarge the ISO 100 picture to the size of the ISO 400 picture.  Optionally perform some noise reduction on the ISO 400 picture.  Which looks better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really better to crop than zoom on a 3x zoom with about 1.6 stops of light loss?  When zoomed out all the way, you get 3 times as much light, but you&#8217;re only interested in the middle of the picture (1/9th of the frame), so you end up with about a third as much light being used.</p>
<p>Do an experiment: take the picture zoomed out all the way, at ISO 100.  Take the same picture zoomed in all the way, at ISO 400 (to more than compensate for the light loss).  Crop and enlarge the ISO 100 picture to the size of the ISO 400 picture.  Optionally perform some noise reduction on the ISO 400 picture.  Which looks better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shackDan</title>
		<link>http://photocritic.org/compact-camera-tips/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>shackDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photocritic.org/2006/compact-camera-tips/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the reference.  You are quite right about the light loss, and it generally meant that I had to take portaits in the sun, or at least on a bright day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the reference.  You are quite right about the light loss, and it generally meant that I had to take portaits in the sun, or at least on a bright day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
