Emergency tripod? Piece of string!

Posted by Haje Jan Kamps

The main problem of taking photos free-hand is that your hands aren’t particularly sturdy. Myself, I find using a heavier camera makes it a lot easier (the inertia of the camera means it is reluctant to move, so up to a point, a heavy camera is easier to hold still for the duration of a photographic exposure than a very light camera.), but what about lighter cameras?

The obvious answer is a tripod or a monopod, but these devices can be terribly heavy, and they are not particularly portable. One solution is to hold the camera against a surface (a tree, a building, or a signpost), but that doesn’t always work either, and none of these items offer an awful lot of flexibility.

$ earned from this advert will be invested in beer

How do you stabilise your camera most often?
View Results

How?

I often find myself thinking “Damn, if there was only a way to anchor the camera to the ground…”, and I recently found a solution that works: A String Tripod (also known as a Chainpod)!

It is a laughably simple device: You get a wing nut bolt (or anything that screws in) that fits into the tripod hole of your camera (you are looking for a bolt with 3.5×8″ threads), and drill a small hole into the bolt. Then, you attach a length of string to it, with a loop at the end. If you use the shearing lines available for tents, you can vary the length of the loop, and, as such, the height of the camera.

To use one of these string tripods, put your foot (or feet) through the loop, and pull the string taut against your foot. Now, out of nowhere, your camera will be a lot more stable, as it has an axis against which it cannot move (up/down). This means that you can hold the camera a lot calmer - you would be surprised how much of a difference this can make!

But… But…

Sure, it will never replace a proper tripod or monopod, but I wouldn’t be surprised if you gain a couple of stops on your shutter time by using this system. And the best thing? Making one of these is going to cost you less than a bottle of milk and a loaf of bread!

Did you like this post? Stay in touch!

If you liked this post, why not stay in touch with Photocritic going forward?

I'm on Flickr and Twitter, or you could add my RSS feed to your favourite feed reader. Or, if you don't fancy doing any of that, drop us a comment below; you can be anonymous if you want to, but if you add a link to your blog or similar, I'll promise I'll come have a look!

Money made from this advert will be invested in beer.

Insights, suggestions and comments

By James on March 3rd, 2007 (permalink)

Freehand with a fast shutter speed. Depends on what I’m doing, but I like to shoot as high a shutter as I can and lower depth of field to isolate the subject. I tend to shoot candids, and carrying a tripod either isn’t practical or can’t be set up fast enough to be of any use.

By 2xm on March 3rd, 2007 (permalink)

this is one of this things in photography. a tripod needs to have a certain weight. of course i hook on my back-back to the tripod to stabilize it. personally i believe a tripod needs to weigh at least 2.5kg to make a good job!

By Isela on March 3rd, 2007 (permalink)

Great tip! Thanks!

By Taneli on March 3rd, 2007 (permalink)

Problem with that poll is the variety of answers. I use almoust all of them. I have Tripod, monopod, minipod and DIY stingpod. Everyone of these is good for many places and purposes. Also efective flash that can be aimed to the roof to create nice looking illumination and reduce need for flash is also many times good answer. My Canon 5D can also shoot pretty usable pictures in quite dark with ISO 1600 setting and canon 50mm f/1.2L lens without any stabilizer. I also use trees, walls, roch etc… to stydy my camera. IS zool lens is also very usable in many cases. Only one of those alternatives that I do not use is Quadrapod. I think I need every one of those triks. They all have they benefits.

Still it is very good that you bring this thing up. Really important! Only thing that I did’t like were the choises in that poll.

By Robert on March 4th, 2007 (permalink)

If you make the string double so when tied down at the bottom ends, the resultant inverted V will add even more stability.

Also consider making up the V with some like a fish hook { like NOT equal } and if you measure for the right height for the camera to be at you eye, You hook the bottom of the string or strings to your shoe laces .

It also helps to fire the shutter after the exhale of your breath and before the inhale.

Bi pods work great!

By Guilherme Zuhlke O'Connor on March 5th, 2007 (permalink)

Incredibly smart device.

By bigstusexy on March 6th, 2007 (permalink)

Unless its technically covered by the IS zoom lens you forgot antishake sensor mounts or lense array. Thats what I use mostly on my new camera, works quite well. However I think the capturing mechanism is slower than what its rated but thats a different argument.

Mostly free hand I guess, I’ve been dying to make one of these ever since I went to the Sears Tower and they got after me quickly when I opened up my tripod. As my camera’s mount isn’t in line with the center of the Lens I don’t think I’ll try to take as many Panorama shots because of the multiplexing errors I’ll unavoidably get.

I agree with the VMethod talked about here and when i read about this however if I had the equipment and money I’d like to go fast lens and minor physical sensor adjustment all the time where freehand was acceptable.

By throughwaters on March 28th, 2007 (permalink)

The more stable chainpod with two strings (shaped like an inverted V) can be made even simpler by using a *loop* of string. Place both feet on the loop and spread your feet to shoulder width apart for a simple, stable chainpod.

 

Share your wisdom



Current Poll

By the end of the month, will you own an iPhone?
View Results

My recent Flickr favourites

©ashley suzanne taylorWalt Disney Concert Hall 2Caressed by the Sun IIIPale LifeBorage flower"Between the lights and the shadows, a woman sits"End of Day (II)Midsummer!Hair Trim (87/365)Rocas ValleThe Netherlands, insidePaint the town Pink.Have a good day!DSC_4102Bending The Laws of Gravityzot does not like to be woken. zot will kill you with her eyes. And then, maybe, she can get some peace and quiet.
See all my Flickr favourites here

My recent Flickr uploads

near Swingate, ENG, United KingdomWarmenhuizen, North Holland, NetherlandsKorrewegwijk, Groningen, Netherlandsnear Ladegårdshuse, Roskilde, Denmarknear Hornstrup, Vejle, DenmarkVejleHolmenkollen, Oslo, NorwayRogaland reflected in an Arai
See my Flickr galleries here

Photocritic on Twitter...

  • Jul 3 tweet: http://bit.ly/v7PfR was nominated to become a Twitter tee - feel free to vote it down if you think it's lame! :) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: "We shot 50,000 pix, printed 8,000 of them and shot another 1,800 pictures" - http://is.gd/1lTrX (YouTube video / stop motion animation) (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: I failed to notice that I now have over 3,000 followers! I'll do my best not to disappoint, stay tuned for Photocritic updates soon. (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: The Human Printer 'prints' photographs in CMYK using felt-tip markers. Bonkers, but very cool: http://is.gd/1li3D (link)
  • Jul 2 tweet: I love abstract buildings, strong colours and great lighting, this has it all: http://is.gd/1lh9a (link)
  • Jul 1 tweet: This dude wrote a profile of me which makes me sound like a rock star: http://is.gd/1kK0Y Awesome stuff. (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My book

macrocover.jpg
... is now available from »Amazon.com and »Amazon.co.uk, too!

About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje