Archive for Getting a bit philosophical

Taking photos for the future

A photo from 100 years ago is quaint, mysterious, and informative - partially because there aren't that many of them. Today, everyone has a camera, and everyone is taking photos - In the pub a few months ago, I was talking to a historian about photography, and about what photos taken today would mean to historians of the future. We've all got a string of iconic photos in our heads. The ones that capture a particular time, place, or event - for example the VJ Day celebrations in London that marked the end of the Second World War or the fall of the Berlin Wall. But have you ever considered what it is that makes a photograph historically valuable, or what you might need to do to take one of those photos? Says Daniela: "Haje and I were talking about this a while ago, and seeing as I'm a historian to whom he's taught an awful lot about photography, he thought I might have something to say about it. Turns out, I do..."

Read all of Taking photos for the future (8 comments so far)

The death of film photography

"When I was given my first digital camera, I thanked the giver politely and set it on a shelf—where it sat, growing dust, for two years. I simply had no use for it.", recalls John, a long-time Photocritic reader, who decided to share some of his thoughts about his (at first painful) transition from film to megapixels. Take it away John... Now, I have nothing against photography. Photos are great when you're eager to relive that once-in-a-lifetime trip to Thailand, or when the sight of the neighbour's bawling infant recalls you to the time your son crawled into your mother-in-law's lap with his nappy falling off his bum. But film cameras immortalise such special occasions just fine, so why bother with digital?

Read all of The death of film photography (17 comments so far)

Photographic treasure-hunt

Combine a good old-fashioned team-based treasure hunt with a photography competition, and you've got a recipe for success, right? Well, that's what I thought too, when I signed up to attend Shoot London, an event based out of the Tate gallery, organised by Shoot Experience, a company who organises these kind of events for public and corporate events. Sadly, it turns out that I'll probably give future Shoot Experience events a miss - to find out why, I spoke to another participant of the event...

Read all of Photographic treasure-hunt (2 comments so far)

Teaching yourself photography

Imagine, for a second, that you are a young person with a camera. There are other cameras in the world around you, and there are people who use those cameras, too, but nobody really knows what they are doing, nobody can teach you anything you don't already know, and the only tool you have in the world is the internet. All hope is lost ... Or is it? I was recently speaking to Elisa Longhitano, who found herself in the same situation. As she was telling me about how she was teaching herself photography, I found myself smiling, and wishing I had access to the internet back when I was learning. Either way, Elisa's story is a lovely reminder of the fact that all you need to do to learn the dark (well, technically, the perfectly gradient) art of photography, is to be curious, and just that little bit inventive...

Read all of Teaching yourself photography (13 comments so far)

The problem with microstock

We do an experiment with microstock, and discover that while I sold three times more photos, I earned 40 times less money from the micro stock sales than from a full-on agency - with the exact same photos on sale... The lesson? If you're a decent photographer, stay the hell away from micro-stock: The bigger agencies treat you better, pay you more, and actually make an effort to sell your photos on a bigger scale.

Read all of The problem with microstock (24 comments so far)

The death of photo journalism

"From this day, the painting is dead", Paul Delaroche exclaimed when he saw the first Daguerreotype in 1839. He turned out to be wrong about the bit about the art of painting being dead, but photography certainly had a profound impact on our way of life. As a matter of fact, as early as in 1900, it was said that "the daily press, advertisements, posters, scientific literature, the popular lecture, decoration, and now the kinetograph, not to speak of the coming colored photography, have all contributed what is probably slowly coming to be a new mode of pictorial thought" (Goldberg 1991, p16)

Read all of The death of photo journalism (7 comments so far)

Oi! You! No pictures!

A few months ago, I ran a story on how the UK government was trying to restrict public photography. It seems as if they're now playing the back-pedalling game in a big kind of way. Once the petition hit 60,000 signatures, the Prime Minister's office issued a statement which can be summarised into 'uh, no, we never intended these kinds of changes to be made'. What I really want to know: Do you have any stories of instances where people tried to stop you from taking photos? Leave a comment!

Read all of Oi! You! No pictures! (27 comments so far)

Prime lenses, and why you need one

So, you've got a SLR, do you? Smashing. You might have a kit lens, a tele-zoom, and a couple of flashes by now, and you're feeling pretty hot about yourself and your camera gear, are you? Well, good on you. But until you've got a decent prime lens, you haven't really lived. And I'm here to tell you why. Back in the infancy of photography, we never had anything but prime lenses. When you bought a camera body, you first of all buy a camera lens to go with it. A 50mm f/1.8 was pretty much the slowest lens you could buy as a starter kit.

Read all of Prime lenses, and why you need one (65 comments so far)

The rule of Thirds

What is this rule of thirds thing anyway? Basically, it's a rule of the thumb designed to help you compose powerful images. As with most rules in photography, it is important to learn it, understand it, and make it your friend, before you start breaking it. The biggest argument is that once you know what conventionally creates a strong photograph, you can make informed decisions as to how you can adapt and bend the rules to create even stronger compositions. The great thing about the rule of thirds is that you can use it as little or as much as you want: It's always there, and you use it when you need it.

Read all of The rule of Thirds (12 comments so far)

White Balance Explained

You may have spotted the lightbulb, cloud, electricity and woodshed symbols on your camera's screen or menus. You may have also ignored them as being yet another degree of complexity that you don't need to know about. Alternatively, you may have seen people on the Internet earnestly discussing colour temperature and swearing by all sorts of essential products that will guarantee perfect results, if you re-mortgage your house this one last time. And ignored it as another expense that you can probably do without. Well that thing you're ignoring is one of the most powerful ways of making your photos convey the scene you wanted to capture: white balance.

Read all of White Balance Explained (24 comments so far)