Photocritic encourages dogma photography.

About Photocritic

History of the website

The idea of Photocritic started in the late 90s: I had a grand idea of starting a photo criticism site, based on the Norwegian foto.no photo critique site, but aimed at an international audience, and on a far greater scale. I started looking into hiring a programmer to do the work, and started learning how to code myself as well. Soon, it turned out that the idea was a bit optimistic, and eventually I stumbled over a site called PhotoSIG, which had all the functionality I wanted from a photo criticism site.

By then, however, I had bought the Photocritic.org domain, and I figured it was too good a domain to just ignore. I used it as my photography portfolio for a while. In 2002, I started out as a freelance photographer, and as it turned out, Photocritic was not used as a company name by anyone, and soon, Photocritic Ltd was born:

fulllogo.jpg

The fish in the logo is a multi-lingual pun: My name is ‘Haje’, which with a bit of butchering sounds like Hai or Haai – which means Shark in Norwegian and Dutch respectively. Seeing as I had strong ties with Holland (I’m Dutch), and Norway (I lived there for 14 years), and because a shark was as good a logo as any, it became my company identity.

I worked as a freelance photographer as I finished my Journalism degree in Liverpool, and switched to full-time once my degree was finished. After about a year, however, I decided that I didn’t have the self-dicipline or inclination to be working for myself at that point in time, and I decided to start looking for a ‘proper job’.

As I re-entered the ranks as a wage slave, the Photocritic.org domain yet again fell into disuse, and I recycled it for a third time, this time into a writing and photography site. In December 2005, one of my articles got slash- and digg-dotted, and that was the motivation I needed for re-vamping the website. I swapped from Mambo/Jumla to WordPress, and have never looked back.

About the design history of Photocritic

Photocritic started up on a bone-stock classic Wordpress design based on Kubrick, with merely a redesigned header image as the only visual modification:

Picture-71.jpg

After that, I tried doing a new design, but it turned out to be the least popular change I ever made to my site. Personally, I really liked the design (and I’m currently thinking about implementing it on the Wordpress site running my private website), but people had comments such as “It looks like a clown puked after eating too much candy. It’s hideous and amateur looking”.

Picture-61.jpg

Instead, I got a friend of mine to come up with a brand new design, this time in proper retro style. Which is how the site came to look like this:

Picture-8.jpg

Picture-21.jpgAbout the author

I’m just this guy, you know? My job is in publishing, and I’m also in the process of writing a book about photography. Although I don’t take freelance photography assignments anymore, I’m still an avid enthusiast, and I do a lot of photography in my spare time. If you like my writing, there’s loads more over on my personal website – all the non-photography-related stuff goes on there, and all the photo stuff goes on here.

If you want to contact me, try hajejan@kamps.org!

Go on, click the button

Ludicrously over-the-top DIY projects (like building your own laser trigger are...
View Results

Get notified!

If you want to get a notification whenever Photocritic makes a new post, fill in the form below!

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox

I love this on Flickr

On the Book of Face

Photocritic on Facebook

It goes 'tweet'

  • • Had a go at product photography of my new watch tonight. Jeebus, is that difficult... http://flic.kr/p/7JRbap #Flickr (link)
  • • RT @warandpeace Simple concept knocked out of the fucking park. This is my new desktop wallpaper! http://bit.ly/bdNr09 (link)
  • • Ever have trouble calculating when the 'golden hour' of sunset light will be? Not anymore - http://www.golden-hour.com/ /via @warandpeace (link)
  • • "This content belongs to Photocritic photography blog". Yes it does. So what is it doing on your site? http://ow.ly/1ge0V #CopyrightFail (link)
  • • Confessions of a So-Called Pro photographer: http://ow.ly/1g2ln (link)
  • • @tpphotography it's what economists call a 'captive audience' - similar but non-interchangeable goods. Nikon can charge whatever they want. (link)
  • follow @photocritic on Twitter!

My books

Macro Photography Photo Workshop

Macro Photography Photo Workshop by Haje Jan Kamps My day job, if it can be called that, is being a writer. I've got one book out there so far and it's awesome, so go ahead and buy a copy! It's available from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and most decent-sized bookshops, too!

To find out more, check out this post! If you want to know more about the 'being a writer' thing, check this site out.

Put another dime in the jukebox

Put another dime in the jukebox In front of you, five hyperactive men with guitars, drums, and microphones. Behind you, five thousand fans. In your hands, a camera... You're going to need more than just a little bit of good luck to pull this one off. That's where this book comes in.

With nearly a hundred fantastic gig photos, and a ton of info about how to get involved in taking photos like this yourself, you can't go wrong. Buy this book. Grab your camera. Good luck.

Street Photography: London

Street Photography: London Take a Canon EOS 450D. Attach a Canon 50mm f/1.4 lens. Hit the streets of London. See what happens.

Sounds simple - but the results are anything but. Moving, intense, and personal, Street Photography: London is a great collection of the people of London, their passions, and their dreams. Look for yourself!


About

This site is all about learning more about photography, from the incredibly insightful (rarely) to the dreadfully mundane (also, hopefully rarely) via just about everything in between.

If this website seems a little whimsical and random, then that's because the author of this blog, who for the occasion is confusing himself by writing about himself in the third person, is slightly whimsical and random himself.

Enjoy!

- Haje